IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i3p373-d1574836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Electricity Markets Through Game-Theoretical Methods: Strategic and Policy Implications for Power Purchasing and Generation Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Lefeng Cheng

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Pengrong Huang

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Mengya Zhang

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Ru Yang

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Yafei Wang

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

This review proposes a novel integration of game-theoretical methods—specifically Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT), Stackelberg games, and Bayesian games—with deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to optimize electricity markets. Our approach uniquely addresses the dynamic interactions among power purchasing and generation enterprises, highlighting both theoretical underpinnings and practical applications. We demonstrate how this integrated framework enhances market resilience, informs evidence-based policy-making, and supports renewable energy expansion. By explicitly connecting our findings to regulatory strategies and real-world market scenarios, we underscore the political implications and applicability of our results in diverse global electricity systems. By integrating EGT with advanced methodologies such as DRL, this study develops a comprehensive framework that addresses both the dynamic nature of electricity markets and the strategic adaptability of market participants. This hybrid approach allows for the simulation of complex market scenarios, capturing the nuanced decision-making processes of enterprises under varying conditions of uncertainty and competition. The review systematically evaluates the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of various control policies implemented within electricity markets, including pricing mechanisms, capacity incentives, renewable integration incentives, and regulatory measures aimed at enhancing market competition and transparency. Our analysis underscores the potential of EGT to significantly enhance market resilience, enabling electricity markets to better withstand shocks such as sudden demand fluctuations, supply disruptions, and regulatory changes. Moreover, the integration of EGT with DRL facilitates the promotion of sustainable energy integration by modeling the strategic adoption of renewable energy technologies and optimizing resource allocation. This leads to improved overall market performance, characterized by increased efficiency, reduced costs, and greater sustainability. The findings contribute to the development of robust regulatory frameworks that support competitive and efficient electricity markets in an evolving energy landscape. By leveraging the dynamic and adaptive capabilities of EGT and DRL, policymakers can design regulations that not only address current market challenges but also anticipate and adapt to future developments. This proactive approach is essential for fostering a resilient energy infrastructure capable of accommodating rapid advancements in renewable technologies and shifting consumer demands. Additionally, the review identifies key areas for future research, including the exploration of multi-agent reinforcement learning techniques and the need for empirical studies to validate the theoretical models and simulations discussed. This study provides a comprehensive roadmap for optimizing electricity markets through strategic and policy-driven interventions, bridging the gap between theoretical game-theoretic models and practical market applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Lefeng Cheng & Pengrong Huang & Mengya Zhang & Ru Yang & Yafei Wang, 2025. "Optimizing Electricity Markets Through Game-Theoretical Methods: Strategic and Policy Implications for Power Purchasing and Generation Enterprises," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-90, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:373-:d:1574836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/3/373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/3/373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esmat, Ayman & de Vos, Martijn & Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar & Palensky, Peter & Epema, Dick, 2021. "A novel decentralized platform for peer-to-peer energy trading market with blockchain technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    2. Liu, Jinqi & Wang, Jihong & Cardinal, Joel, 2022. "Evolution and reform of UK electricity market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Friedrich Kunz and Alexander Zerrahn, 2016. "Coordinating Cross-Country Congestion Management: Evidence from Central Europe," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Sustainab).
    4. Ke, Xinda & Wu, Di & Rice, Jennie & Kintner-Meyer, Michael & Lu, Ning, 2016. "Quantifying impacts of heat waves on power grid operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 504-512.
    5. Xueying Ding & Xiao Liao & Wei Cui & Xiangliang Meng & Ruosong Liu & Qingshan Ye & Donghe Li, 2024. "A Deep Reinforcement Learning Optimization Method Considering Network Node Failures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Li, Tianyu & Gao, Ciwei & Chen, Tao & Jiang, Yu & Feng, Yingchun, 2022. "Medium and long-term electricity market trading strategy considering renewable portfolio standard in the transitional period of electricity market reform in Jiangsu, China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Lu, Qing & Lü, Shuaikang & Leng, Yajun, 2019. "A Nash-Stackelberg game approach in regional energy market considering users’ integrated demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 456-470.
    8. Li, Xueqin & Zheng, Zhuoji & Luo, Beier & Shi, Daqian & Han, Xianfeng, 2024. "The impact of electricity sales side reform on energy technology innovation: An analysis based on SCP paradigm," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Pla, Benjamín & Bares, Pau & Aronis, André Nakaema & Anuratha, Sanjith, 2024. "Leveraging battery electric vehicle energy storage potential for home energy saving by model predictive control with backward induction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    10. Li, Jiamei & Ai, Qian & Yin, Shuangrui & Hao, Ran, 2022. "An aggregator-oriented hierarchical market mechanism for multi-type ancillary service provision based on the two-loop Stackelberg game," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    11. Xinyi Xie & Liming Ying & Xue Cui, 2022. "Price Strategy Analysis of Electricity Retailers Based on Evolutionary Game on Complex Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Ma, Xiaochen & Pan, Yanchun & Zhang, Manzi & Ma, Jianhua & Yang, Wen, 2024. "Impact of carbon emission trading and renewable energy development policy on the sustainability of electricity market: A stackelberg game analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    13. Elnur T. Mekhdiev & Nursafa G. Khairullina & Alexandr S. Vereshchagin & Elena V. Takmakova & Olga M. Smirnova, 2018. "Review of Energy Transition Pathways Modeling," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 299-312.
    14. Zhiyuan MA & Zijian ZHAO & Changyi LIU & Fang YANG & Mou WANG, 2022. "The Impacts and Adaptation of Climate Extremes on the Power System: Insights from the Texas Power Outage Caused by Extreme Cold Wave," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(01), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Pasaoglu, Guzay & Harrison, Gillian & Jones, Lee & Hill, Andrew & Beaudet, Alexandre & Thiel, Christian, 2016. "A system dynamics based market agent model simulating future powertrain technology transition: Scenarios in the EU light duty vehicle road transport sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 133-146.
    16. Wang, Xiangwei & Wang, Peng & Huang, Renke & Zhu, Xiuli & Arroyo, Javier & Li, Ning, 2025. "Safe deep reinforcement learning for building energy management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PA).
    17. Yuk-shing Cheng & Man-kit Chung & Kam-pui Tsang, 2023. "Electricity Market Reforms for Energy Transition: Lessons from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Mary Finley-Brook & Erica L. Holloman, 2016. "Empowering Energy Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Ringler, Philipp & Keles, Dogan & Fichtner, Wolf, 2017. "How to benefit from a common European electricity market design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 629-643.
    20. Scott, Ian J. & Botterud, Audun & Carvalho, Pedro M.S. & Silva, Carlos A. Santos, 2020. "Renewable energy support policy evaluation: The role of long-term uncertainty in market modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    21. Gao, Hongchao & Jin, Tai & Feng, Cheng & Li, Chuyi & Chen, Qixin & Kang, Chongqing, 2024. "Review of virtual power plant operations: Resource coordination and multidimensional interaction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Ke & Ye, Ning & Li, Shuzhen & Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui, 2023. "Distributed collaborative operation strategies in multi-agent integrated energy system considering integrated demand response based on game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    2. Han, Jian & Tan, Qinliang & Ding, Yihong & Liu, Yuan, 2024. "Exploring the diffusion of low-carbon power generation and energy storage technologies under electricity market reform in China: An agent-based modeling framework for power sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    3. Lei, Yu-Tian & Ma, Chao-Qun & Mirza, Nawazish & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Narayan, Seema Wati & Chen, Xun-Qi, 2022. "A renewable energy microgrids trading management platform based on permissioned blockchain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Kim, Sunwoo & Choi, Yechan & Park, Joungho & Adams, Derrick & Heo, Seongmin & Lee, Jay H., 2024. "Multi-period, multi-timescale stochastic optimization model for simultaneous capacity investment and energy management decisions for hybrid Micro-Grids with green hydrogen production under uncertainty," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    5. Gnann, Till & Stephens, Thomas S. & Lin, Zhenhong & Plötz, Patrick & Liu, Changzheng & Brokate, Jens, 2018. "What drives the market for plug-in electric vehicles? - A review of international PEV market diffusion models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 158-164.
    6. Lyu, Cheng & Jia, Youwei & Xu, Zhao, 2021. "Fully decentralized peer-to-peer energy sharing framework for smart buildings with local battery system and aggregated electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    7. Wang, Zhuowei & Yu, Jiangbo (Gabe) & Chen, Anthony & Fu, Xiaowen, 2024. "Subsidy policies towards zero-emission bus fleets: A systematic technical-economic analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1-13.
    8. Wang, Ning & Shang, Kai & Duan, Yan & Qin, Dandan, 2023. "Carbon quota allocation modeling framework in the automotive industry based on repeated game theory: A case study of ten Chinese automotive enterprises," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    9. Li, He & Wang, Pengyu & Fang, Debin, 2024. "Differentiated pricing for the retail electricity provider optimizing demand response to renewable energy fluctuations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Zuobin Ying & Wusong Lan & Chen Deng & Lu Liu & Ximeng Liu, 2023. "DVIT—A Decentralized Virtual Items Trading Forum with Reputation System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Yue, Tingyi & Wang, Honglei & Li, Chengjiang & Hu, Yu-jie, 2024. "Optimization strategies for green power and certificate trading in China considering seasonality: An evolutionary game-based system dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    12. Ernest Barceló & Katarina Dimić-Mišić & Monir Imani & Vesna Spasojević Brkić & Michael Hummel & Patrick Gane, 2023. "Regulatory Paradigm and Challenge for Blockchain Integration of Decentralized Systems: Example—Renewable Energy Grids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    13. Jan Málek & Lukáš Recka & Karel Janda, 2017. "Impact of German Energiewende on transmission lines in the Central European region," CAMA Working Papers 2017-72, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    14. Will, Christian & Zimmermann, Florian & Ensslen, Axel & Fraunholz, Christoph & Jochem, Patrick & Keles, Dogan, 2024. "Can electric vehicle charging be carbon neutral? Uniting smart charging and renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    15. Sara Khan & Uzma Amin & Ahmed Abu-Siada, 2024. "P2P Energy Trading of EVs Using Blockchain Technology in Centralized and Decentralized Networks: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Jayajit Chakraborty & Timothy W. Collins & Sara E. Grineski, 2016. "Environmental Justice Research: Contemporary Issues and Emerging Topics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-5, November.
    17. Li, Jingjing & Nian, Victor & Jiao, Jianling, 2022. "Diffusion and benefits evaluation of electric vehicles under policy interventions based on a multiagent system dynamics model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    18. Samarth Kumar & David Schönheit & Matthew Schmidt & Dominik Möst, 2019. "Parsing the Effects of Wind and Solar Generation on the German Electricity Trade Surplus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Kang, Jidong & Wu, Zhuochun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2023. "A stochastic-robust optimization model for inter-regional power system planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1234-1248.
    20. Jun Liu & Jinchun Chen & Chao Wang & Zhang Chen & Xinglei Liu, 2020. "Market Trading Model of Urban Energy Internet Based on Tripartite Game Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:373-:d:1574836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.