IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i9p1368-d797398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chaotic Search-Based Salp Swarm Algorithm for Dealing with System of Nonlinear Equations and Power System Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed A. El-Shorbagy

    (Department of Mathematics, College of Science and Humanities in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Basic Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom 32511, Egypt)

  • Islam M. Eldesoky

    (Department of Basic Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom 32511, Egypt
    Basic Sciences Department, Elmenofia Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology, El Bagour 32821, Egypt)

  • Mohamady M. Basyouni

    (Department of Basic Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom 32511, Egypt)

  • Islam Nassar

    (Department of Basic Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom 32511, Egypt)

  • Adel M. El-Refaey

    (Basic and Applied Science Department, College of Engineering and Technology, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Smart Village Campus, Giza 12577, Egypt)

Abstract

The system of nonlinear equations (SNLEs) is one of the eminent problems in science and engineering, and it is still open to research. A new hybrid intelligent algorithm is presented in this research to solve SNLEs. It is a composite of the salp swarm algorithm (SSA) and chaotic search technique (CST). The proposed methodology is named chaotic salp swarm algorithm (CSSA). CSSA is designed as an optimization process, whereby feasible and infeasible solutions are updated to move closer to the optimum value. The use of this hybrid intelligent methodology aims to improve performance, increase solution versatility, avoid the local optima trap, speed up convergence and optimize the search process. Firstly, SNLEs are transformed into an optimization problem. Secondly, CSSA is used to solve this optimization problem: SSA is used to update the feasible solutions, whereas the infeasible solutions are updated by CST. One of the most significant advantages of the suggested technique is that it does not ignore infeasible solutions that are updated, because these solutions are often extremely near to the optimal solution, resulting in increased search effectiveness and effective exploration and exploitation. The algorithm’s mathematical model is presented in detail. Finally, the proposed approach is assessed with several benchmark problems and real-world applications. Simulation results show that the proposed CSSA is competitive and better in comparison to others, which illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. In addition, a statistical analysis by the Wilcoxon rankings test between CSSA and the other comparison methods shows that all p -values are less than 0.05, and CSSA achieves negative ranks’ sum values (R − ) much better than the positive ranks’ sum values (R + ) in all benchmark problems. In addition, the results have high precision and show good agreement in comparison with similar methods, and they further proved the ability of CSSA to solve real-world applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed A. El-Shorbagy & Islam M. Eldesoky & Mohamady M. Basyouni & Islam Nassar & Adel M. El-Refaey, 2022. "Chaotic Search-Based Salp Swarm Algorithm for Dealing with System of Nonlinear Equations and Power System Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-30, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:9:p:1368-:d:797398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/9/1368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/9/1368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Bartholomew-Biggs, 2008. "Nonlinear Optimization with Engineering Applications," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, number 978-0-387-78723-7, December.
    2. El-Shorbagy, M.A. & Mousa, A.A. & Nasr, S.M., 2016. "A chaos-based evolutionary algorithm for general nonlinear programming problems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 8-21.
    3. Abdelsalam, Ali M. & El-Shorbagy, M.A., 2018. "Optimization of wind turbines siting in a wind farm using genetic algorithm based local search," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 748-755.
    4. Yang, Dixiong & Li, Gang & Cheng, Gengdong, 2007. "On the efficiency of chaos optimization algorithms for global optimization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 1366-1375.
    5. M.A El-Shorbagy & A.A Mousa, 2017. "Chaotic Particle Swarm Optimization for Imprecise Combined Economic and Emission Dispatch Problem," Review of Information Engineering and Applications, Conscientia Beam, vol. 4(1), pages 20-35.
    6. repec:pkp:roieaa:2017:p:20-35 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammed A. El-Shorbagy & Fatma M. Al-Drees, 2023. "Studying the Effect of Introducing Chaotic Search on Improving the Performance of the Sine Cosine Algorithm to Solve Optimization Problems and Nonlinear System of Equations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Abdulaziz Almalaq & Tawfik Guesmi & Saleh Albadran, 2023. "A Hybrid Chaotic-Based Multiobjective Differential Evolution Technique for Economic Emission Dispatch Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-34, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. A. El-Shorbagy & A. Y. Ayoub & A. A. Mousa & I. M. El-Desoky, 2019. "An enhanced genetic algorithm with new mutation for cluster analysis," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1355-1392, September.
    2. M. A. El-Shorbagy & A. A. Mousa & M. A. Farag, 2019. "An intelligent computing technique based on a dynamic-size subpopulations for unit commitment problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 911-944, September.
    3. Mohammed A. El-Shorbagy & Fatma M. Al-Drees, 2023. "Studying the Effect of Introducing Chaotic Search on Improving the Performance of the Sine Cosine Algorithm to Solve Optimization Problems and Nonlinear System of Equations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Sun, Yeong-Jeu, 2009. "An exponential observer for the generalized Rossler chaotic system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 2457-2461.
    5. Dhunny, A.Z. & Timmons, D.S. & Allam, Z. & Lollchund, M.R. & Cunden, T.S.M., 2020. "An economic assessment of near-shore wind farm development using a weather research forecast-based genetic algorithm model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Houssem R. E. H. Bouchekara & Yusuf A. Sha’aban & Mohammad S. Shahriar & Makbul A. M. Ramli & Abdullahi A. Mas’ud, 2023. "Wind Farm Layout Optimization/Expansion with Real Wind Turbines Using a Multi-Objective EA Based on an Enhanced Inverted Generational Distance Metric Combined with the Two-Archive Algorithm 2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-32, January.
    7. Salil Bharany & Sandeep Sharma & Surbhi Bhatia & Mohammad Khalid Imam Rahmani & Mohammed Shuaib & Saima Anwar Lashari, 2022. "Energy Efficient Clustering Protocol for FANETS Using Moth Flame Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Sultan Almotairi & Elsayed Badr & Mustafa Abdul Salam & Alshimaa Dawood, 2023. "Three Chaotic Strategies for Enhancing the Self-Adaptive Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm for Global Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Cheng, Shen & Zhao, Gaiju & Gao, Ming & Shi, Yuetao & Huang, Mingming & Yousefi, Nasser, 2021. "Optimal hybrid energy system for locomotive utilizing improved Locust Swarm optimizer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    10. Martin Ćalasan & Dražen Jovanović & Vesna Rubežić & Saša Mujović & Slobodan Đukanović, 2019. "Estimation of Single-Diode and Two-Diode Solar Cell Parameters by Using a Chaotic Optimization Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Abdelsalam, Ali M. & El-Shorbagy, M.A., 2018. "Optimization of wind turbines siting in a wind farm using genetic algorithm based local search," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 748-755.
    12. Muhammad Nabeel Hussain & Nadeem Shaukat & Ammar Ahmad & Muhammad Abid & Abrar Hashmi & Zohreh Rajabi & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Micro-Siting of Wind Turbines in an Optimal Wind Farm Area Using Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Hossein Lotfi, 2022. "A Multiobjective Evolutionary Approach for Solving the Multi-Area Dynamic Economic Emission Dispatch Problem Considering Reliability Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Rani, Mamta & Agarwal, Rashi, 2009. "A new experimental approach to study the stability of logistic map," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 2062-2066.
    15. Naanaa, Anis, 2015. "Fast chaotic optimization algorithm based on spatiotemporal maps for global optimization," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 402-411.
    16. Wu, Yan & Zhang, Shuai & Wang, Ruiqi & Wang, Yufei & Feng, Xiao, 2020. "A design methodology for wind farm layout considering cable routing and economic benefit based on genetic algorithm and GeoSteiner," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 687-698.
    17. Kaldellis, John K. & Triantafyllou, Panagiotis & Stinis, Panagiotis, 2021. "Critical evaluation of Wind Turbines’ analytical wake models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    18. Petrović, A. & Đurišić, Ž., 2021. "Genetic algorithm based optimized model for the selection of wind turbine for any site-specific wind conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    19. Neculai Andrei, 2020. "Diagonal Approximation of the Hessian by Finite Differences for Unconstrained Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 859-879, June.
    20. Dai, Juchuan & Tan, Yayi & Shen, Xiangbin, 2019. "Investigation of energy output in mountain wind farm using multiple-units SCADA data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 225-238.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:9:p:1368-:d:797398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.