IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i5p817-d1602704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Chaotic Decomposition-Based Approach for Enhanced Multi-Objective Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Javad Alikhani Koupaei

    (Department of Mathematics, Payame Noor University, Tehran P.O. Box 19395-3697, Iran)

  • Mohammad Javad Ebadi

    (Department of Mathematics, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar 9971778631, Iran
    Department of Law, Economics and Human Sciences, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, 89125 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

Abstract

Multi-objective optimization problems often face challenges in balancing solution accuracy, computational efficiency, and convergence speed. Many existing methods struggle with achieving an optimal trade-off between exploration and exploitation, leading to premature convergence or excessive computational costs. To address these issues, this paper proposes a chaotic decomposition-based approach that leverages the ergodic properties of chaotic maps to enhance optimization performance. The proposed method consists of three key stages: (1) chaotic sequence initialization, which generates a diverse population to enhance the global search while reducing computational costs; (2) chaos-based correction, which integrates a three-point operator (TPO) and a local improvement operator (LIO) to refine the Pareto front and balance the exploration–exploitation trade-offs; and (3) Tchebycheff decomposition-based updating, ensuring efficient convergence toward optimal solutions. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted extensive experiments on a suite of benchmark problems and compared its performance with several state-of-the-art methods. The evaluation metrics, including inverted generational distance (IGD), generational distance (GD), and spacing (SP), demonstrated that the proposed method achieves competitive optimization accuracy and efficiency. While maintaining computational feasibility, our approach provides a well-balanced trade-off between exploration and exploitation, leading to improved solution diversity and convergence stability. The results establish the proposed algorithm as a promising alternative for solving multi-objective optimization problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Javad Alikhani Koupaei & Mohammad Javad Ebadi, 2025. "A Chaotic Decomposition-Based Approach for Enhanced Multi-Objective Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:817-:d:1602704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/5/817/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/5/817/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Qiuzhen & Li, Jianqiang & Du, Zhihua & Chen, Jianyong & Ming, Zhong, 2015. "A novel multi-objective particle swarm optimization with multiple search strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 732-744.
    2. Yang, Dixiong & Li, Gang & Cheng, Gengdong, 2007. "On the efficiency of chaos optimization algorithms for global optimization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 1366-1375.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Yeong-Jeu, 2009. "An exponential observer for the generalized Rossler chaotic system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 2457-2461.
    2. Alfredo Alcayde & Raul Baños & Francisco M. Arrabal-Campos & Francisco G. Montoya, 2019. "Optimization of the Contracted Electric Power by Means of Genetic Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Cui, Yunfei & Geng, Zhiqiang & Zhu, Qunxiong & Han, Yongming, 2017. "Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 681-704.
    4. Wei-Chiang Hong & Yucheng Dong & Chien-Yuan Lai & Li-Yueh Chen & Shih-Yung Wei, 2011. "SVR with Hybrid Chaotic Immune Algorithm for Seasonal Load Demand Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Ying Sun & Yuelin Gao, 2019. "A Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based on Gaussian Mutation and an Improved Learning Strategy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Imene Khenissi & Tawfik Guesmi & Ismail Marouani & Badr M. Alshammari & Khalid Alqunun & Saleh Albadran & Salem Rahmani & Rafik Neji, 2023. "Energy Management Strategy for Optimal Sizing and Siting of PVDG-BES Systems under Fixed and Intermittent Load Consumption Profile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-28, January.
    7. Coelho, Leandro dos Santos, 2009. "Reliability–redundancy optimization by means of a chaotic differential evolution approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 594-602.
    8. Liu, Ruochen & Li, Jianxia & fan, Jing & Mu, Caihong & Jiao, Licheng, 2017. "A coevolutionary technique based on multi-swarm particle swarm optimization for dynamic multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1028-1051.
    9. Salil Bharany & Sandeep Sharma & Surbhi Bhatia & Mohammad Khalid Imam Rahmani & Mohammed Shuaib & Saima Anwar Lashari, 2022. "Energy Efficient Clustering Protocol for FANETS Using Moth Flame Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Sultan Almotairi & Elsayed Badr & Mustafa Abdul Salam & Alshimaa Dawood, 2023. "Three Chaotic Strategies for Enhancing the Self-Adaptive Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm for Global Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Cheng, Shen & Zhao, Gaiju & Gao, Ming & Shi, Yuetao & Huang, Mingming & Yousefi, Nasser, 2021. "Optimal hybrid energy system for locomotive utilizing improved Locust Swarm optimizer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    12. Martin Ćalasan & Dražen Jovanović & Vesna Rubežić & Saša Mujović & Slobodan Đukanović, 2019. "Estimation of Single-Diode and Two-Diode Solar Cell Parameters by Using a Chaotic Optimization Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, November.
    13. El-Shorbagy, M.A. & Mousa, A.A. & Nasr, S.M., 2016. "A chaos-based evolutionary algorithm for general nonlinear programming problems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 8-21.
    14. Hossein Lotfi, 2022. "A Multiobjective Evolutionary Approach for Solving the Multi-Area Dynamic Economic Emission Dispatch Problem Considering Reliability Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Rani, Mamta & Agarwal, Rashi, 2009. "A new experimental approach to study the stability of logistic map," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 2062-2066.
    16. Naanaa, Anis, 2015. "Fast chaotic optimization algorithm based on spatiotemporal maps for global optimization," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 402-411.
    17. Zouache, Djaafar & Moussaoui, Abdelouahab & Ben Abdelaziz, Fouad, 2018. "A cooperative swarm intelligence algorithm for multi-objective discrete optimization with application to the knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 74-88.
    18. Hamza Mohammed Ridha Al-Khafaji, 2022. "Improving Quality Indicators of the Cloud-Based IoT Networks Using an Improved Form of Seagull Optimization Algorithm," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Li, Huan & Li, Kun & Zafetti, Nicholas & Gu, Jianfeng, 2020. "Improvement of energy supply configuration for telecommunication system in remote area s based on improved chaotic world cup optimization algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    20. Yong Wang & Jiayi Zhe & Xiuwen Wang & Yaoyao Sun & Haizhong Wang, 2022. "Collaborative Multidepot Vehicle Routing Problem with Dynamic Customer Demands and Time Windows," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-37, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:817-:d:1602704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.