IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i1p245-d1034189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protection of Environmental and Natural Values of Urban Areas against Investment Pressure: A Case Study of Romania and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Paulina Legutko-Kobus

    (Department Public Policy, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Maciej Nowak

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor

    (Doctoral School of Urban Planning, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, 10014 Bucharest, Romania
    Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Technical University of Moldova, 2004 Chisinau, Moldova
    National Institute for Research and Development in Tourism, 50741 Bucharest, Romania
    National Institute for Research and Development in Constructions, Urbanism and Sustainable Spatial Development URBAN-INCERC, 21652 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Dan Bărbulescu

    (Doctoral School in Ecology, Department of Systems Ecology and Sustainability, University of Bucharest, 050095 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cerasella Craciun

    (Doctoral School of Urban Planning, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, 10014 Bucharest, Romania
    Department of Urban Planning and Landscape, Faculty of Urban Planning, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, 10014 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă

    (Doctoral School of Urban Planning, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, 10014 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Although conservation and development are two facets of sustainability, they are often placed in contradictory positions. In this context, planning systems are able to respond to investment pressure, especially in countries with underdeveloped institutional solutions for this purpose, and are consequently characterized by a shifting relationship between spatial planning and environmental protection. Although these issues have been relatively well conceptualized, the literature still lacks more in-depth analyses of selected case studies. In order to fill the gap, this study aimed to identify potential ways to protect the environment and natural values in urban areas from investment pressures in countries with less developed planning systems, based on a comparative Polish-Romanian perspective. The method consisted of comparing the national legal frameworks for environmental protection and spatial development and analyzing in detail two case studies from each country. The findings indicate that national protection is required in both countries to ensure the effective protection of natural areas situated within city administrative limits that provide important ecosystem services. Moreover, the results reveal the need for more research on similar areas using multi-scale interdisciplinary approaches and reviewing planning theory with respect to its efficiency in protecting nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Dan Bărbulescu & Cerasella Craciun & Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă, 2023. "Protection of Environmental and Natural Values of Urban Areas against Investment Pressure: A Case Study of Romania and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:245-:d:1034189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/245/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/245/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carl Österlin & Kaisa Raitio, 2020. "Fragmented Landscapes and Planscapes—The Double Pressure of Increasing Natural Resource Exploitation on Indigenous Sámi Lands in Northern Sweden," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-28, August.
    2. Anele Horn, 2019. "The history of urban growth management in South Africa: tracking the origin and current status of urban edge policies in three metropolitan municipalities," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 959-977, November.
    3. Wouter van Gent & Cody Hochstenbach, 2020. "The neo-liberal politics and socio-spatial implications of Dutch post-crisis social housing policies," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 156-172, January.
    4. Chomitz, Kenneth M. & Alger, Keith & Thomas, Timothy S. & Orlando, Heloisa & Nova, Paulo Vila, 2005. "Opportunity costs of conservation in a biodiversity hotspot: the case of southern Bahia," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 293-312, June.
    5. Pearce, David & Markandya, Anil, 1987. "Marginal Opportunity Cost as a Planning Concept in Natural Resource Management," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 21(3), pages 18-32, November.
    6. Wouter van Gent & Cody Hochstenbach, 2020. "The neo-liberal politics and socio-spatial implications of Dutch post-crisis social housing policies," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 156-172, January.
    7. Siân Butcher, 2020. "Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 337-361, March.
    8. Simone Tulumello & Giancarlo Cotella & Frank Othengrafen, 2020. "Spatial planning and territorial governance in Southern Europe between economic crisis and austerity policies," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 72-87, January.
    9. Wendy Steele & Kristian Ruming, 2012. "Flexibility versus Certainty: Unsettling the Land-use Planning Shibboleth in Australia," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 155-176.
    10. Jeanne Dachary-Bernard & Frederic Gaschet & Baptiste Hautdidier & Marie Lemarié-Boutry & Guillaume Pouyanne, 2018. "Entre protection et ouverture : quels effets de la politique d’usage des sols sur les dynamiques de marché foncier sur le littoral aquitain ?," Post-Print hal-02614154, HAL.
    11. Przemysław Śleszyński & Adam Kowalewski & Tadeusz Markowski & Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak, 2020. "The Contemporary Economic Costs of Spatial Chaos: Evidence from Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-28, July.
    12. Barbara Szulczewska & Renata Giedych & Gabriela Maksymiuk, 2017. "Can we face the challenge: how to implement a theoretical concept of green infrastructure into planning practice? Warsaw case study," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 176-194, February.
    13. Vera Ferreira & Ana Paula Barreira & Luís Loures & Dulce Antunes & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Engagement on Nature-Based Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    14. Marcin Dąbrowski & Katarzyna Piskorek, 2018. "The development of strategic spatial planning in Central and Eastern Europe: between path dependence, European influence, and domestic politics," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 571-589, October.
    15. Yakusheva, Natalya, 2019. "Managing protected areas in Central Eastern Europe: Between path-dependence and Europeanisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    16. Thomas Panagopoulos, 2019. "Special Issue: Landscape Urbanism and Green Infrastructure," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-4, July.
    17. Przemysław Śleszyński & Maciej Nowak & Paweł Sudra & Magdalena Załęczna & Małgorzata Blaszke, 2021. "Economic Consequences of Adopting Local Spatial Development Plans for the Spatial Management System: The Case of Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Norton-Griffiths, Michael & Southey, Clive, 1995. "The opportunity costs of biodiversity conservation in Kenya," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 125-139, February.
    19. Namatama, Nathan, 2020. "An assessment of stakeholders’ participation in land use planning process of Luapula Province Planning Authority," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    20. Debrunner, Gabriela & Hartmann, Thomas, 2020. "Strategic use of land policy instruments for affordable housing – Coping with social challenges under scarce land conditions in Swiss cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    21. Kubacka, Marta & Żywica, Patryk & Vila Subirós, Josep & Bródka, Sylwia & Macias, Andrzej, 2022. "How do the surrounding areas of national parks work in the context of landscape fragmentation? A case study of 159 protected areas selected in 11 EU countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    22. Mike Raco & Nicola Livingstone & Daniel Durrant, 2019. "Seeing like an investor: urban development planning, financialisation, and investors’ perceptions of London as an investment space," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 1064-1082, June.
    23. Alexandru-Ionuț Petrișor & Lidia Mierzejewska & Andrei Mitrea, 2022. "Mechanisms of Change in Urban Green Infrastructure—Evidence from Romania and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, April.
    24. Monstadt, Jochen & Meilinger, Valentin, 2020. "Governing Suburbia through regionalized land-use planning? Experiences from the Greater Frankfurt region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    25. Andra-Cosmina Albulescu & Michael Manton & Daniela Larion & Per Angelstam, 2022. "The Winding Road towards Sustainable Forest Management in Romania, 1989–2022: A Case Study of Post-Communist Social–Ecological Transition," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-29, July.
    26. Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Andrei Mitrea & Krisztina Filepné Kovács & Gunta Lukstina & Evelin Jürgenson & Zuzana Ladzianska & Velislava Simeonova & Roman Lozynskyy & Vit Rezac & Viktori, 2022. "The Role of Spatial Plans Adopted at the Local Level in the Spatial Planning Systems of Central and Eastern European Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maciej J. Nowak & Milena Bera & Miltiades Lazoglou & Jorge Olcina-Cantos & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Renato Monteiro & Andrei Mitrea, 2024. "Comparison of Urban Climate Change Adaptation Plans in Selected European Cities from a Legal and Spatial Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Maria Bostenaru Dan & Adrian Ibric & Mara Popescu & Cerasella Crăciun, 2024. "Architectural Heritage and Archetypal Landscape Approaches Facing Environmental Hazards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Bąkowska-Waldmann Edyta & Piniarski Witold, 2023. "Gender-Specific Preferences Regarding Urban Green Areas," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 42(4), pages 23-41, December.
    4. Nowak, Maciej & Śleszyński, Przemysław & Cheba, Katarzyna & Blaszke, Małgorzata & Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2023. "Flexibility of land use plans: Between supporting development and opportunism. Evidence from Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maciej Nowak & Viktoriya Pantyley & Małgorzata Blaszke & Liudmila Fakeyeva & Roman Lozynskyy & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor, 2023. "Spatial Planning at the National Level: Comparison of Legal and Strategic Instruments in a Case Study of Belarus, Ukraine, and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Andrei Mitrea & Krisztina Filepné Kovács & Gunta Lukstina & Evelin Jürgenson & Zuzana Ladzianska & Velislava Simeonova & Roman Lozynskyy & Vit Rezac & Viktori, 2022. "The Role of Spatial Plans Adopted at the Local Level in the Spatial Planning Systems of Central and Eastern European Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Maciej J. Nowak & Agnieszka Brelik & Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel & Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka & Justyna Przedańska, 2023. "Spatial Conflicts concerning Wind Power Plants—A Case Study of Spatial Plans in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Maciej J. Nowak & Renato Monteiro & Jorge Olcina-Cantos & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2023. "Spatial Planning Response to the Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation: An Analysis of Selected Instruments and Good Practices in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Cody Hochstenbach & Richard Ronald, 2020. "The unlikely revival of private renting in Amsterdam: Re-regulating a regulated housing market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(8), pages 1622-1642, November.
    6. Vera Götze & Josje Anna Bouwmeester & Mathias Jehling, 2024. "For whom do we densify? Explaining income variation across densification projects in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1273-1290, May.
    7. Nowak, Maciej & Śleszyński, Przemysław & Cheba, Katarzyna & Blaszke, Małgorzata & Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2023. "Flexibility of land use plans: Between supporting development and opportunism. Evidence from Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Antonio Ledda & Marta Kubacka & Giovanna Calia & Sylwia Bródka & Vittorio Serra & Andrea De Montis, 2023. "Italy vs. Poland: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Planning System Attitudes toward Adaptation to Climate Changes and Green Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Nienke Fredrika Boesveldt & Dolly Loomans, 2024. "Housing the homeless: Shifting sites of managing the poor in the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1393-1410, May.
    10. Małgorzata Blaszke & Iwona Foryś & Maciej J. Nowak & Bartosz Mickiewicz, 2022. "Selected Characteristics of Municipalities as Determinants of Enactment in Municipal Spatial Plans for Renewable Energy Sources—The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Herath Mudiyanselage Malhamige Sonali Dinesha Herath & Takeshi Fujino & Mudalige Don Hiranya Jayasanka Senavirathna, 2023. "A Review of Emerging Scientific Discussions on Green Infrastructure (GI)-Prospects towards Effective Use of Urban Flood Plains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Przemysław Śleszyński & Maciej Nowak & Paweł Sudra & Magdalena Załęczna & Małgorzata Blaszke, 2021. "Economic Consequences of Adopting Local Spatial Development Plans for the Spatial Management System: The Case of Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Różycka-Czas Renata & Czesak Barbara & Staszel Andrzej, 2021. "Which Polish Cities Sprawl the Most," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Christopher A Kirkby & Renzo Giudice-Granados & Brett Day & Kerry Turner & Luz Marina Velarde-Andrade & Agusto Dueñas-Dueñas & Juan Carlos Lara-Rivas & Douglas W Yu, 2010. "The Market Triumph of Ecotourism: An Economic Investigation of the Private and Social Benefits of Competing Land Uses in the Peruvian Amazon," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-14, September.
    15. Przemysław Śleszyński & Maciej Nowak & Agnieszka Brelik & Bartosz Mickiewicz & Natalia Oleszczyk, 2021. "Planning and Settlement Conditions for the Development of Renewable Energy Sources in Poland: Conclusions for Local and Regional Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Małgorzata Blaszke & Maciej Nowak & Przemysław Śleszyński & Bartosz Mickiewicz, 2021. "Investments in Renewable Energy Sources in the Concepts of Local Spatial Policy: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Hui Sun & Chunhui Liu & Jiaxing Wei, 2021. "Identifying Key Sites of Green Infrastructure to Support Ecological Restoration in the Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    18. Götze, Vera & Hartmann, Thomas, 2021. "Why municipalities grow: The influence of fiscal incentives on municipal land policies in Germany and the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    19. Remme, Roy P. & Meacham, Megan & Pellowe, Kara E. & Andersson, Erik & Guerry, Anne D. & Janke, Benjamin & Liu, Lingling & Lonsdorf, Eric & Li, Meng & Mao, Yuanyuan & Nootenboom, Christopher & Wu, Tong, 2024. "Aligning nature-based solutions with ecosystem services in the urban century," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Nunes, P.A.L.D. & Nijkamp, P., 2011. "Biodiversity: Economic perspectives," Serie Research Memoranda 0002, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:245-:d:1034189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.