IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v135y2023ics0264837723004052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexibility of land use plans: Between supporting development and opportunism. Evidence from Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Nowak, Maciej
  • Śleszyński, Przemysław
  • Cheba, Katarzyna
  • Blaszke, Małgorzata
  • Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna
  • Ioppolo, Giuseppe

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to examine the relationship between the flexibility of spatial planning at the local level and the natural and socio-economic development indicators of municipalities. Seventy municipalities located around the most dynamically developing large urban centers in Poland (Krakow, Poznań, Tri-City, Warsaw, and Wrocław) were selected for the study, in which the records of 1131 local spatial plans enacted in 2017–2019 were analyzed in detail in terms of indicators including, but not limited to, characterizing the average area of the plans, the duration of the development procedure, and the intensity of residential development, the biologically active area. Development characteristics were identified through 30 indicators in six thematic groups (demographic, socio-professional, economic and settlement structures, natural environment, and spatial planning). The relationships between the two groups of indicators were analyzed using factor analysis. On this basis, three clusters were identified, explaining 32.9% of the variation. Such a relatively low result may indicate that the spatial policy pursued by local governments is highly individualized. It may also be concluded that the flexibility of spatial planning in general is weakly related to the characteristics of development, including natural and socio-economic development, and therefore its absence should not be an obstacle to it.

Suggested Citation

  • Nowak, Maciej & Śleszyński, Przemysław & Cheba, Katarzyna & Blaszke, Małgorzata & Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2023. "Flexibility of land use plans: Between supporting development and opportunism. Evidence from Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:135:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723004052
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723004052
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meng Meng & Marcin Dabrowski & Dominic Stead, 2020. "Enhancing Flood Resilience and Climate Adaptation: The State of the Art and New Directions for Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Vincent Nadin & Dominic Stead & Marcin Dąbrowski & Ana Maria Fernandez-Maldonado, 2021. "Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 791-803, May.
    3. Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Dan Bărbulescu & Cerasella Craciun & Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă, 2023. "Protection of Environmental and Natural Values of Urban Areas against Investment Pressure: A Case Study of Romania and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, January.
    4. Kaisa Granqvist & Alois Humer & Raine Mäntysalo, 2021. "Tensions in city-regional spatial planning: the challenge of interpreting layered institutional rules," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 844-856, May.
    5. Wendy Steele & Kristian Ruming, 2012. "Flexibility versus Certainty: Unsettling the Land-use Planning Shibboleth in Australia," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 155-176.
    6. Przemysław Śleszyński & Adam Kowalewski & Tadeusz Markowski & Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak, 2020. "The Contemporary Economic Costs of Spatial Chaos: Evidence from Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-28, July.
    7. Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna & Cheba, Katarzyna & Bąk, Iwona & Kiba-Janiak, Maja & Saniuk, Sebastian & Dembińska, Izabela & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2017. "The application of relative taxonomy to the study of disproportions in the area of sustainable development of the European Union," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 481-491.
    8. Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Cifang Wu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xinhua Tong & Yanfei Wei & Xiaoqiang Shen, 2019. "Inside or Outside? The Impact Factors of Zoning–Land Use Mismatch," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Van den Hoek, Duncan & Spit, Tejo & Hartmann, Thomas, 2020. "Certain flexibilities in land-use plans Towards a method for assessing flexibility," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Philip Booth, 2016. "Planning and the rule of law," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 344-360, July.
    11. Marek Walesiak & Grażyna Dehnel & Marek Obrębalski, 2021. "Assessment of the Europe 2020 Strategy: A Multidimensional Indicator Analysis via Dynamic Relative Taxonomy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Andrei Mitrea & Krisztina Filepné Kovács & Gunta Lukstina & Evelin Jürgenson & Zuzana Ladzianska & Velislava Simeonova & Roman Lozynskyy & Vit Rezac & Viktori, 2022. "The Role of Spatial Plans Adopted at the Local Level in the Spatial Planning Systems of Central and Eastern European Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Nurit Alfasi, 2006. "Planning Policy? Between Long-Term Planning and Zoning Amendments in the Israeli Planning System," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(3), pages 553-568, March.
    14. Eva Purkarthofer & Alois Humer & Hanna Mattila, 2021. "Subnational and Dynamic Conceptualisations of Planning Culture: The Culture of Regional Planning and Regional Planning Cultures in Finland," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 244-265, March.
    15. Panagiotis Getimis, 2012. "Comparing Spatial Planning Systems and Planning Cultures in Europe. The Need for a Multi-scalar Approach," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 25-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Zhenhua & Song, Gaohui & Hu, Ziyue & Fang, Jiaqi, 2024. "An improved dynamic game analysis of farmers, enterprises and rural collective economic organizations based on idle land reuse policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maciej Nowak & Viktoriya Pantyley & Małgorzata Blaszke & Liudmila Fakeyeva & Roman Lozynskyy & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor, 2023. "Spatial Planning at the National Level: Comparison of Legal and Strategic Instruments in a Case Study of Belarus, Ukraine, and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Małgorzata Blaszke & Iwona Foryś & Maciej J. Nowak & Bartosz Mickiewicz, 2022. "Selected Characteristics of Municipalities as Determinants of Enactment in Municipal Spatial Plans for Renewable Energy Sources—The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Dan Bărbulescu & Cerasella Craciun & Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă, 2023. "Protection of Environmental and Natural Values of Urban Areas against Investment Pressure: A Case Study of Romania and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, January.
    4. Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Andrei Mitrea & Krisztina Filepné Kovács & Gunta Lukstina & Evelin Jürgenson & Zuzana Ladzianska & Velislava Simeonova & Roman Lozynskyy & Vit Rezac & Viktori, 2022. "The Role of Spatial Plans Adopted at the Local Level in the Spatial Planning Systems of Central and Eastern European Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Maciej J. Nowak & Agnieszka Brelik & Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel & Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka & Justyna Przedańska, 2023. "Spatial Conflicts concerning Wind Power Plants—A Case Study of Spatial Plans in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Maciej J. Nowak & Renato Monteiro & Jorge Olcina-Cantos & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2023. "Spatial Planning Response to the Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation: An Analysis of Selected Instruments and Good Practices in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    7. Bogusława Baran-Zgłobicka & Dominika Godziszewska & Wojciech Zgłobicki, 2021. "The Flash Floods Risk in the Local Spatial Planning (Case Study: Lublin Upland, E Poland)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Kukulska-Kozieł, Anita, 2023. "Buildable land overzoning. Have new planning regulations in Poland resolved the issue?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    9. Małgorzata Blaszke & Maciej Nowak & Przemysław Śleszyński & Bartosz Mickiewicz, 2021. "Investments in Renewable Energy Sources in the Concepts of Local Spatial Policy: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Muxin Jia & Ang Liu & Taro Narahara, 2024. "The Integration of Dual Evaluation and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering to Support Decision-Making in Territorial Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Joanna M. McMillan & Joern Birkmann & Siwaporn Tangwanichagapong & Ali Jamshed, 2022. "Spatial Planning and Systems Thinking Tools for Climate Risk Reduction: A Case Study of the Andaman Coast, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Sorin Gabriel Anton & Ionel Bostan, 2017. "The Role of Access to Finance in Explaining Cross-National Variation in Entrepreneurial Activity: A Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Auziņš Armands & Viesturs Jānis, 2017. "A Values-Led Planning Approach for Sustainable Land Use and Development," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 275-286, November.
    14. Antonio Ledda & Marta Kubacka & Giovanna Calia & Sylwia Bródka & Vittorio Serra & Andrea De Montis, 2023. "Italy vs. Poland: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Planning System Attitudes toward Adaptation to Climate Changes and Green Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Meiyan Gao & Zongmin Wang & Haibo Yang, 2022. "Review of Urban Flood Resilience: Insights from Scientometric and Systematic Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Mercy J. Borbor-Cordova & Geremy Ger & Angel A. Valdiviezo-Ajila & Mijail Arias-Hidalgo & David Matamoros & Indira Nolivos & Gonzalo Menoscal-Aldas & Federica Valle & Alessandro Pezzoli & Maria del Pi, 2020. "An Operational Framework for Urban Vulnerability to Floods in the Guayas Estuary Region: The Duran Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Michal Braier, 2013. "Zones of Transformation? Informal Construction and Independent Zoning Plans in East Jerusalem," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(11), pages 2700-2716, November.
    18. Bielecka Elzbieta, 2024. "The Spatiotemporal Analysis of Land Take Exemplified by Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Marius Constantin & Mihai Dinu & Simona Roxana Patarlageanu & Cristian Chelariu, 2021. "Sustainable Development Disparities in the EU-27 Based on R&D and Innovation Factors," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(Special15), pages 948-948, November.
    20. Agnieszka Konys, 2019. "Towards Sustainable Entrepreneurship Holistic Construct," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-33, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:135:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723004052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.