IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i2p112-d486537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Consequences of Adopting Local Spatial Development Plans for the Spatial Management System: The Case of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Przemysław Śleszyński

    (Department of Urban and Population Geography, Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-818 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Maciej Nowak

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Paweł Sudra

    (Department of Housing and Urban Renewal, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, 03-728 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Magdalena Załęczna

    (Department of Investments and Real Estate, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz, 90-255 Lodz, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Blaszke

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

The spatial management system in Poland struggles with serious costs as a consequence of local planning. The problem is the lack of appropriate value capturing mechanisms and cost compensation for municipalities, along with significant burdens. Private property is subject to special protection, but the public good is less valued. The article attempts to assess the situation in Poland, recalling also the experiences of spatial management systems from other European countries. It combines legal, economic, and geographical perspectives. The specific objectives were demonstration of geographical (interregional and functional) regularities related to the economic (financial) consequences of adopting local plans and identification of financial effects resulting from the implementation of local plans in communes, i.e., in particular, their size, structure of revenues (income), and expenditures, in relations with the budgets of municipalities and the population living in communes. First, the determinants of spatial policy were defined in the context of institutional economics and the real estate market. Then, a unique database of forecasted and realized budgetary revenues and expenditures of 2477 communes in Poland related to spatial development (infrastructure construction, land transformation, purchase, etc.) was analyzed statistically. Additionally, for five selected communes of different functional types, this issue was examined in detail. It has been shown that municipalities do not derive adequate income from spatial development, and improper policy of local self-governments results in heavy burdens, threatening to disturb their financial balance. The formulated conclusions regarding the legal, economic, and spatial mechanisms may contribute to building tools (instruments) for more effective spatial management in various countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Przemysław Śleszyński & Maciej Nowak & Paweł Sudra & Magdalena Załęczna & Małgorzata Blaszke, 2021. "Economic Consequences of Adopting Local Spatial Development Plans for the Spatial Management System: The Case of Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:112-:d:486537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Reimer & Hans Blotevogel, 2012. "Comparing Spatial Planning Practice in Europe: A Plea for Cultural Sensitization," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 7-24.
    2. Glaeser, Edward L. & Ward, Bryce A., 2009. "The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 265-278, May.
    3. Michael Goldman, 2011. "Speculative Urbanism and the Making of the Next World City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 555-581, May.
    4. Anna Majewska & Małgorzata Denis & Wioleta Krupowicz, 2020. "Urbanization Chaos of Suburban Small Cities in Poland: ‘Tetris Development’," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-27, November.
    5. Przemysław Śleszyński & Adam Kowalewski & Tadeusz Markowski & Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak, 2020. "The Contemporary Economic Costs of Spatial Chaos: Evidence from Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-28, July.
    6. Ehrlich, Maximilian V. & Hilber, Christian A.L. & Schöni, Olivier, 2018. "Institutional settings and urban sprawl: Evidence from Europe," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 4-18.
    7. Elena G. Irwin & Nancy E. Bockstael, 2001. "The Problem of Identifying Land Use Spillovers: Measuring the Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(3), pages 698-704.
    8. Kim, Minjee, 2020. "Upzoning and value capture: How U.S. local governments use land use regulation power to create and capture value from real estate developments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Gunilla Lindholm, 2019. "Land and Landscape; Linking Use, Experience and Property Development in Urban Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Rebelo, Emília Malcata, 2017. "Land betterment capture revisited: A methodology for territorial plans," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 392-407.
    11. Debrunner, Gabriela & Hartmann, Thomas, 2020. "Strategic use of land policy instruments for affordable housing – Coping with social challenges under scarce land conditions in Swiss cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Avinash K. Dixit, 1998. "The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction Cost Politics Perspective," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262540983, April.
    13. Anderson, Soren T. & West, Sarah E., 2006. "Open space, residential property values, and spatial context," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 773-789, November.
    14. Vincent Nadin, 2012. "International Comparative Planning Methodology: Introduction to the Theme Issue," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 1-5.
    15. Kok, Nils & Monkkonen, Paavo & Quigley, John M., 2014. "Land use regulations and the value of land and housing: An intra-metropolitan analysis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 136-148.
    16. Pennington, Derric N. & Dalzell, Brent & Nelson, Erik & Mulla, David & Taff, Steve & Hawthorne, Peter & Polasky, Stephen, 2017. "Cost-effective Land Use Planning: Optimizing Land Use and Land Management Patterns to Maximize Social Benefits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 75-90.
    17. Hiroaki Suzuki & Jin Murakami & Yu-Hung Hong & Beth Tamayose, 2015. "Financing Transit-Oriented Development with Land Values : Adapting Land Value Capture in Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 21286.
    18. Patricia Machemer & Michael Kaplowitz, 2002. "A Framework for Evaluating Transferable Development Rights Programmes," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 773-795.
    19. Bertaud, Alain & Malpezzi, Stephen, 2001. "Measuring the Costs and Benefits of Urban Land Use Regulation: A Simple Model with an Application to Malaysia," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 393-418, September.
    20. Pawel MICKIEWICZ & Maciej J. NOWAK & Bartosz MICKIEWICZ & Andra ZVIRBULE, 2020. "Environmental Protection And Integrated Development Planning In Local Spatial Policy On The Example Of Poland," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(22), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Małgorzata Blaszke & Maciej Nowak & Przemysław Śleszyński & Bartosz Mickiewicz, 2021. "Investments in Renewable Energy Sources in the Concepts of Local Spatial Policy: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Dan Bărbulescu & Cerasella Craciun & Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă, 2023. "Protection of Environmental and Natural Values of Urban Areas against Investment Pressure: A Case Study of Romania and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, January.
    3. Reyman, Katarzyna & Maier, Gunther, 2023. "Property rights regime and the timing of land development in a post-transition country (Poland)," SRE-Discussion Papers 01/2023, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. Gielen Demetrio Muñoz & Ossowicz Tomasz & Zaborowski Tomasz Piotr, 2022. "Failure and opportunities of public value capture and developer obligations in Polish urban development," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 15-30, January.
    5. Przemysław Śleszyński & Maciej Nowak & Agnieszka Brelik & Bartosz Mickiewicz & Natalia Oleszczyk, 2021. "Planning and Settlement Conditions for the Development of Renewable Energy Sources in Poland: Conclusions for Local and Regional Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Maciej J. Nowak & Agnieszka Brelik & Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel & Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka & Justyna Przedańska, 2023. "Spatial Conflicts concerning Wind Power Plants—A Case Study of Spatial Plans in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Maciej Nowak & Giancarlo Cotella & Przemysław Śleszyński, 2021. "The Legal, Administrative, and Governance Frameworks of Spatial Policy, Planning, and Land Use: Interdependencies, Barriers, and Directions of Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-9, October.
    8. Różycka-Czas Renata & Czesak Barbara & Staszel Andrzej, 2021. "Which Polish Cities Sprawl the Most," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Maciej J. Nowak & Renato Monteiro & Jorge Olcina-Cantos & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2023. "Spatial Planning Response to the Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation: An Analysis of Selected Instruments and Good Practices in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    10. Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Andrei Mitrea & Krisztina Filepné Kovács & Gunta Lukstina & Evelin Jürgenson & Zuzana Ladzianska & Velislava Simeonova & Roman Lozynskyy & Vit Rezac & Viktori, 2022. "The Role of Spatial Plans Adopted at the Local Level in the Spatial Planning Systems of Central and Eastern European Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Daniel Pavlačka & Dominik Kaim & Krzysztof Ostafin & Jaroslav Burian, 2023. "Changes in spatial discontinuity in settlement patterns in the Czech‐Polish border area: A case study of Těšín Silesia," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 102(3), pages 565-587, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davis, Jenna, 2021. "How do upzonings impact neighborhood demographic change? Examining the link between land use policy and gentrification in New York City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Guillaume POUYANNE & Frederic GASCHET, 2013. "The Effect Of Current And Future Land Use On House Prices," ERSA conference papers ersa13p249, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Lima, Ricardo Carvalho de Andrade & Silveira Neto, Raul da Mota, 2019. "Zoning ordinances and the housing market in developing countries: Evidence from Brazilian municipalities," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    4. Yidi Wang & Ying Fan & Zan Yang, 2022. "Challenges, Experience, and Prospects of Urban Renewal in High-Density Cities: A Review for Hong Kong," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Lönnroth, Tea & Krigsholm, Pauliina & Falkenbach, Heidi & Oikarinen, Elias, 2024. "Advancing understanding of the linkages between local land policy interventions and the responsiveness of housing supply: Intervention mechanisms in the Finnish context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. Maria Rosaria Guarini & Pierluigi Morano & Alessandro Micheli & Francesco Sica, 2021. "Public-Private Negotiation of the Increase in Land or Property Value by Urban Variant: An Analytical Approach Tested on a Case of Real Estate Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-30, October.
    7. Sanglim Yoo & John E. Wagner, 2016. "A review of the hedonic literatures in environmental amenities from open space: a traditional econometric vs. spatial econometric model," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 141-166, March.
    8. Beal-Hodges, Mary, 2012. "Conservation land acquisition lists and nearby property values: evidence from the Florida Forever programme," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 114(1), pages 1-8.
    9. Zhang, Junfu, 2023. "JUE Insight: Measuring the Stringency of Land Use Regulation Using a Shadow Price Approach," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Delores Conway & Christina Li & Jennifer Wolch & Christopher Kahle & Michael Jerrett, 2010. "A Spatial Autocorrelation Approach for Examining the Effects of Urban Greenspace on Residential Property Values," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 150-169, August.
    11. Hans R A Koster, 2024. "The Welfare Effects of Greenbelt Policy: Evidence from England," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(657), pages 363-401.
    12. Richard J. Vyn, 2012. "Examining for Evidence of the Leapfrog Effect in the Context of Strict Agricultural Zoning," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(3), pages 457-477.
    13. Zipp, Katherine Y. & Lewis, David J. & Provencher, Bill, 2017. "Does the conservation of land reduce development? An econometric-based landscape simulation with land market feedbacks," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 19-37.
    14. Fernandez, Linda & Cutter, Bowman & Sharma, Ritu & Scott, Tom, 2018. "Land preservation policy effect or neighborhood dynamics: A repeat sales hedonic matching approach," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 311-326.
    15. Kristina Grange, 2014. "In Search of Radical Democracy: The Ideological Character of Current Political Advocacies for Culture Change in Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2670-2685, November.
    16. JunJie Wu & Wenchao Xu & Ralph Alig, 2016. "How Do the Location, Size and Budget of Open Space Conservation Affect Land Values?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 73-97, January.
    17. Piotr Lityński & Artur Hołuj, 2021. "Macroeconomic Perspective on Urban Sprawl: A Multidimensional Approach in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Paavo Monkkonen & Lucas Ronconi, 2013. "Land Use Regulations, Compliance and Land Markets in Argentina," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(10), pages 1951-1969, August.
    19. Nir Mualam & Andreas Hendricks & Vida Maliene & Eyal Salinger, 2021. "Value Capture and Vertical Allocations of Public Amenities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Michael Manville & Michael Lens & Paavo Monkkonen, 2022. "Zoning and affordability: A reply to Rodríguez-Pose and Storper," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 36-58, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:112-:d:486537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.