IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v61y2024i7p1273-1290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

For whom do we densify? Explaining income variation across densification projects in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Vera Götze

    (Institute of Geography & Center for Regional Economic Development (CRED), University of Bern, Switzerland)

  • Josje Anna Bouwmeester

    (Institute of Geography & Center for Regional Economic Development (CRED), University of Bern, Switzerland)

  • Mathias Jehling

    (Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Germany)

Abstract

While governments worldwide rely upon compact city policies to reduce land consumption from urban growth, recent studies have addressed the potential trade-off between densification and housing affordability. Concerns have been voiced that densification leads to a one-sided housing supply, structurally excluding low-income households. However, few studies address household income variation across densification projects, leaving us with a limited understanding of the circumstances under which exclusion occurs. To this end, we explore household incomes in densification projects between 2012 and 2020 in the Province of Utrecht, the Netherlands, where urban development is traditionally strongly regulated through active land policy. At the same time, current shifts towards a more deregulated housing market make for an interesting case. Exceptional access to detailed cadastral and census data allows us to identify densification projects and assign them a median household income each. We investigate the influence of location and transformation process on household incomes through regression analysis and conduct qualitative case studies of projects whose median income was highly mispredicted by the regression model. This allows us to integrate non-quantified factors, such as land ownership and public policy interventions, in explaining such interesting cases. For the Province of Utrecht, our study confirms that while households in densification projects earn significantly more than their neighbours, the range of incomes in densification projects is large. Project characteristics such as centrality, neighbourhood status and transformation process explain only a small share of this variance. For cases where median incomes are much lower than predicted by the model, public land ownership, in combination with inclusionary zoning, is essential in ensuring housing affordability. Our approach highlights the necessity of supplementing densification policies with measures that secure affordable housing.

Suggested Citation

  • Vera Götze & Josje Anna Bouwmeester & Mathias Jehling, 2024. "For whom do we densify? Explaining income variation across densification projects in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1273-1290, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:7:p:1273-1290
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980231205793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980231205793
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980231205793?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rolf Pendall & John I. Carruthers, 2003. "Does density exacerbate income segregation? Evidence from U.S. metropolitan areas, 1980 to 2000," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 541-589, January.
    2. Eric Charmes & Roger Keil, 2015. "The Politics of Post-Suburban Densification in Canada and France," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 581-602, May.
    3. Lieberman, Evan S., 2005. "Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 99(3), pages 435-452, August.
    4. Bouwmeester, Josje & Gerber, Jean-David & Hartmann, Thomas & Ay, Deniz, 2023. "Non-compliance and non-enforcement: An unexpected outcome of flexible soft densification policy in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. Peter Bibby & John Henneberry & Jean-Marie Halleux, 2021. "Incremental residential densification and urban spatial justice: The case of England between 2001 and 2011," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2117-2138, August.
    6. Manuel B. Aalbers & Jannes Van Loon & Rodrigo Fernandez, 2017. "The Financialization of A Social Housing Provider," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 572-587, July.
    7. Debrunner, Gabriela & Hartmann, Thomas, 2020. "Strategic use of land policy instruments for affordable housing – Coping with social challenges under scarce land conditions in Swiss cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Markus Moos & Tara Vinodrai & Nick Revington & Michael Seasons, 2018. "Planning for Mixed Use: Affordable for Whom?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(1), pages 7-20, January.
    9. Garcia-López, Miquel-Àngel & Moreno-Monroy, Ana I., 2018. "Income segregation in monocentric and polycentric cities: Does urban form really matter?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 62-79.
    10. Nachmany, Harel & Hananel, Ravit, 2023. "The Urban Renewal Matrix," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Vera Götze & Mathias Jehling, 2023. "Comparing types and patterns: A context-oriented approach to densification in Switzerland and the Netherlands," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1645-1659, July.
    12. van Oosten, Thomas & Witte, Patrick & Hartmann, Thomas, 2018. "Active land policy in small municipalities in the Netherlands: “We don’t do it, unless...”," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 829-836.
    13. Christopher De Sousa, 2000. "Brownfield Redevelopment versus Greenfield Development: A Private Sector Perspective on the Costs and Risks Associated with Brownfield Redevelopment in the Greater Toronto Area," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 831-853.
    14. Wouter van Gent & Cody Hochstenbach, 2020. "The neo-liberal politics and socio-spatial implications of Dutch post-crisis social housing policies," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 156-172, January.
    15. Melissa Garcia-Lamarca & Isabelle Anguelovski & Helen Cole & James JT Connolly & Lucía Argüelles & Francesc Baró & Stephanie Loveless & Carmen Pérez del Pulgar Frowein & Galia Shokry, 2021. "Urban green boosterism and city affordability: For whom is the ‘branded’ green city?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(1), pages 90-112, January.
    16. Anastasia Touati-Morel, 2015. "Hard and Soft Densification Policies in the Paris City-Region," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 603-612, May.
    17. Wouter van Gent & Cody Hochstenbach, 2020. "The neo-liberal politics and socio-spatial implications of Dutch post-crisis social housing policies," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 156-172, January.
    18. Rebecca Cavicchia & Roberta Cucca, 2020. "Densification and School Segregation: The Case of Oslo," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 217-229.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vera Götze & Mathias Jehling, 2023. "Comparing types and patterns: A context-oriented approach to densification in Switzerland and the Netherlands," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1645-1659, July.
    2. Puustinen, Tuulia & Krigsholm, Pauliina & Falkenbach, Heidi, 2022. "Land policy conflict profiles for different densification types: A literature-based approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    3. Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Dan Bărbulescu & Cerasella Craciun & Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă, 2023. "Protection of Environmental and Natural Values of Urban Areas against Investment Pressure: A Case Study of Romania and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, January.
    4. Nienke Fredrika Boesveldt & Dolly Loomans, 2024. "Housing the homeless: Shifting sites of managing the poor in the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1393-1410, May.
    5. Paolo Veneri & Andre Comandon & Miquel‐Àngel Garcia‐López & Michiel N. Daams, 2021. "What do divided cities have in common? An international comparison of income segregation," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 162-188, January.
    6. Juliet Carpenter, 2018. "‘Social Mix’ as ‘Sustainability Fix’? Exploring Social Sustainability in the French Suburbs," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 29-37.
    7. Peter Bibby & John Henneberry & Jean-Marie Halleux, 2020. "Under the radar? ‘Soft’ residential densification in England, 2001–2011," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(1), pages 102-118, January.
    8. Jonkman, Arend & Meijer, Rick & Hartmann, Thomas, 2022. "Land for housing: Quantitative targets and qualitative ambitions in Dutch housing development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Kristin Kjærås, 2024. "The politics of urban densification in Oslo," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(1), pages 40-57, January.
    10. Vafa Dianati, 2021. "The Interplay between Urban Densification and Place Change in Tehran; Implications for Place-Based Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Cody Hochstenbach & Richard Ronald, 2020. "The unlikely revival of private renting in Amsterdam: Re-regulating a regulated housing market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(8), pages 1622-1642, November.
    12. Marie Howland, 2004. "The Role of Contamination in Central City Industrial Decline," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 18(3), pages 207-219, August.
    13. Stefano Costalli & Luigi Moretti & Costantino Pischedda, 2014. "The Economic Costs of Civil War: Synthetic Counterfactual Evidence and the Effects of Ethnic Fractionalization," HiCN Working Papers 184, Households in Conflict Network.
    14. Corral-Granados, Anabel & Smeplass, Eli & Cecilia Rapp, Anna & Eide Isaksen, Gunilla, 2023. "A study on Children perceptions of social exclusion and the structural drivers of discrimination in Norwegian elementary schools," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Morgan Ubeda, 2020. "Local Amenities, Commuting Costs and Income Disparities Within Cities," Working Papers halshs-03082448, HAL.
    16. Alejandro Avenburg & John Gerring & Jason Seawright, 2023. "How do social scientists reach causal inferences? A study of reception," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 257-275, February.
    17. Monkkonen, Paavo & Zhang, Xiaohu, 2014. "Innovative measurement of spatial segregation: Comparative evidence from Hong Kong and San Francisco," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 99-111.
    18. Cavicchia, Rebecca, 2023. "Housing accessibility in densifying cities: Entangled housing and land use policy limitations and insights from Oslo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    19. Green, T.L., 2018. "Evaluating predictors for brownfield redevelopment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 299-319.
    20. Cacace, Mirella & Ettelt, Stefanie & Mays, Nicholas & Nolte, Ellen, 2013. "Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 156-162.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:7:p:1273-1290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.