IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i8p368-d892554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Earnings Less Risk-Free Interest Charge (ERIC) and Stock Returns—A Value-Based Management Perspective on ERIC’s Relative and Incremental Information Content

Author

Listed:
  • Rainer Lueg

    (Institute for Management, Accounting & Finance, Leuphana University, Universitätsallee 1, 21355 Lüneburg, Germany
    Department of Business and Management, University of Southern Denmark, Universitetsparken 1, 6000 Kolding, Denmark)

  • Jon Svennesen Toft

    (Department of Business and Management, University of Southern Denmark, Universitetsparken 1, 6000 Kolding, Denmark)

Abstract

This paper investigates the relative and incremental information content of KPMG’s recently developed metric for shareholder value creation: earnings less risk-free interest charge (ERIC). We assess if ERIC has a better ability to predict stock returns than earnings , cash flow from operations (CFO) , earnings before extraordinary items (EBEI), residual income (RI) , or economic value added (EVA) . We evaluate data from 214 companies listed on the U.S. Standard & Poor’s 500 Index from 2003 to 2012 (2354 firm-year observations). Similar to previous studies, we confirm that CFO and EBEI have the strongest association with stock returns in the short term, while EVA trails behind all other metrics. In terms of new findings, ERIC is the best predictor of stock returns over a 5-year period, as well as during times of crises (from 2009 to 2010). In this period, ERIC also adds incremental information content beyond that of EBEI. However, the low-short-/mid-term predictive ability of shareholder value metrics (EVA, ERIC) raises concerns regarding their reliable use in future research on shareholder value creation. We consequently propose a research agenda that focuses less on the measurement and more on the management of shareholder value.

Suggested Citation

  • Rainer Lueg & Jon Svennesen Toft, 2022. "Earnings Less Risk-Free Interest Charge (ERIC) and Stock Returns—A Value-Based Management Perspective on ERIC’s Relative and Incremental Information Content," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:368-:d:892554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/8/368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/8/368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin Liao & Helen Kang & Richard D. Morris, 2021. "The value relevance of fair value and historical cost measurements during the financial crisis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2069-2107, April.
    2. Ahmad Ismail, 2006. "Is economic value added more associated with stock return than accounting earnings? The UK evidence," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 2(4), pages 343-353, September.
    3. Alexander A. Robichek & Stewart C. Myers, 1966. "Conceptual Problems In The Use Of Risk‐Adjusted Discount Rates," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 21(4), pages 727-730, December.
    4. Douglas M. Walker, 2013. "Past and Future," Management for Professionals, in: Casinonomics, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 257-261, Springer.
    5. Andrew C. Worthington & Tracey West, 2004. "Australian Evidence Concerning the Information Content of Economic Value-Added," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 29(2), pages 201-223, December.
    6. Daniela Venanzi, 2012. "Financial Performance Measures and Value Creation: the State of the Art," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, number 978-88-470-2451-9, July.
    7. Fabio Korinth & Rainer Lueg, 2022. "Corporate Sustainability and Risk Management—The U-Shaped Relationships of Disaggregated ESG Rating Scores and Risk in the German Capital Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashita Agrawal & Pitabas Mohanty & Navindra Kumar Totala, 2019. "Does EVA Beat ROA and ROE in Explaining the Stock Returns in Indian Scenario? An Evidence Using Mixed Effects Panel Data Regression Model," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(2), pages 103-134, May.
    2. ALEXANDRU BOGEANU Author-Workplace-Name: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies & ELENA CLAUDIA SERBAN Author-Workplace-Name: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies & VASILE ROBU Author-Wo, 2013. "PERFORMANCE TREND AND PERFORMANCE CURRENT RATINGS BY ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED (EVA) Abstract: The Economic Value Added (EVA) is an index of „durable development.” It was proposed by the Stern-Stewart Offi," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 64-84, October.
    3. Sujata Behera, 2021. "Does EVA valuation model outperform earnings valuation model in explaining market value of equity?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6312-6337, October.
    4. Xiaodong Teng & Kun-Shan Wu & Lopin Kuo & Bao-Guang Chang, 2023. "Investigating the double-edged sword effect of environmental, social and governance practices on corporate risk-taking in the high-tech industry," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(2), pages 511-549, June.
    5. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Arkadiusz Babczuk, 2022. "Can the Economic Value Added Be Used as the Universal Financial Metric?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Luc Renneboog & Peter G. Szilagyi, 2008. "Corporate Restructuring and Bondholder Wealth," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 14(4), pages 792-819, September.
    7. James W. Kolari, 1987. "An Analytical Model Of Risky Yield Curves," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 10(4), pages 295-303, December.
    8. Charles E. Hyde, 2018. "The Piotroski F†score: evidence from Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(2), pages 423-444, June.
    9. Tanja Planinc & Marko Kukanja, 2016. "Financial performance of the Slovenian restaurant sector," Tourism and Hospitality Industry 25, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management.
    10. Abdulrahman Alomair & Alan Farley & Helen Hong Yang, 2022. "The impact of IFRS adoption on the value relevance of accounting information in Saudi Arabia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2839-2878, June.
    11. Hamzeh F. Assous, 2022. "Saudi Green Banks and Stock Return Volatility: GLE Algorithm and Neural Network Models," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Lefley, Frank, 1997. "Approaches to risk and uncertainty in the appraisal of new technology capital projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 21-33, November.
    13. Predrag Stančić & Miroslav Todorović & Milan Čupić, 2012. "Value-Based Management And Corporate Governance: A Study Of Serbian Corporations," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 57(193), pages 93-112, April- Ju.
    14. Peter Brusov & Tatiana Filatova, 2023. "Capital Structure Theory: Past, Present, Future," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-30, January.
    15. Espinoza, R. David & Rojo, Javier, 2017. "Towards sustainable mining (Part I): Valuing investment opportunities in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 7-18.
    16. Karen Benson & Peter M Clarkson & Tom Smith & Irene Tutticci, 2015. "A review of accounting research in the Asia Pacific region," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 36-88, February.
    17. Andrey Leonidov & Ilya Tipunin & Ekaterina Serebryannikova, 2020. "On Evaluation of Risky Investment Projects. Investment Certainty Equivalence," Papers 2005.12173, arXiv.org.
    18. Rajaratnam, Myuran & Rajaratnam, Bala & Rajaratnam, Kanshukan, 2014. "A novel equity valuation and capital allocation model for use by long-term value-investors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 483-494.
    19. Tatiana Ponomarenko & Eugene Marin & Sergey Galevskiy, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of Oil and Gas Projects: Justification of Engineering Solutions in the Implementation of Field Development Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Randolph Sloof & Mirjam van Praag, 2008. "The Degradation of Distorted Performance Measures," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-072/3, Tinbergen Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:368-:d:892554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.