IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v26y2021i4p6312-6337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does EVA valuation model outperform earnings valuation model in explaining market value of equity?

Author

Listed:
  • Sujata Behera

Abstract

Most of the previous studies examine the efficiency of EVA versus accounting measures as a periodic performance measure. There is hardly any study conducted on examining and comparing the efficiency of EVA based valuation model with the earnings valuation model. However, this study examines and compares the efficiency EVA valuation with earnings valuation by conducting relative information content analysis across the years and on a year‐wise basis. It is observed that future growth value is the only difference between the two valuation models. This study further examines whether future growth value plays a significant role in increasing/decreasing the explanatory ability of EVA based valuation model compared to the earnings valuation model by conducting incremental information content analysis. It conducts both the analyses by using the sample data of 69 large‐cap, 88 mid‐cap and 79 small‐cap companies over the period 2002–17. The relative information content analysis conducted across the years reveals that large and small‐cap companies respond better to the earnings valuation model, whereas mid‐cap companies respond better to EVA based valuation model. The incremental analysis reveals that future growth value plays a significant role in increasing the decreasing explanatory ability of the EVA valuation model. The analysis conducted year‐wise manner also supported the fact.

Suggested Citation

  • Sujata Behera, 2021. "Does EVA valuation model outperform earnings valuation model in explaining market value of equity?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6312-6337, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:26:y:2021:i:4:p:6312-6337
    DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2121
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ijfe.2121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Easton, Pd & Harris, Ts, 1991. "Earnings As An Explanatory Variable For Returns," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 19-36.
    2. Calum G. Turvey & Linda Lake & Erna van Duren & David Sparling, 2000. "The relationship between economic value added and the stock market performance of agribusiness firms," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(4), pages 399-416.
    3. Ben-Hsien Bao & Da-Hsien Bao, 1998. "Usefulness of Value Added and Abnormal Economic Economic Earnings: An Empirical Examination," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1&2), pages 251-264.
    4. Machuga, Susan M & Pfeiffer, Ray J, Jr & Verma, Kiran, 2002. "Economic Value Added, Future Accounting Earnings, and Financial Analysts' Earnings Per Share Forecasts," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 59-73, January.
    5. Ben‐Hsien Bao & Da‐Hsien Bao, 1998. "Usefulness of Value Added and Abnormal Economic Economic Earnings: An Empirical Examination," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1‐2), pages 251-264, January.
    6. Michael J. Gift & Paul Gift & YeQing Yang, 2010. "Financial Market Reactions To Earnings Announcements And Earnings Forecast Revisions: Evidence From The U.S. And China," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(2), pages 85-96.
    7. Andrew C. Worthington & Tracey West, 2004. "Australian Evidence Concerning the Information Content of Economic Value-Added," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 29(2), pages 201-223, December.
    8. Kenneth Lehn & Anil K. Makhija, 1997. "Eva, Accounting Profits, And Ceo Turnover: An Empirical Examination, 1985–1994," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 10(2), pages 90-97, June.
    9. Biddle, Gary C. & Bowen, Robert M. & Wallace, James S., 1997. "Does EVA(R) beat earnings? Evidence on associations with stock returns and firm values," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 301-336, December.
    10. David Sparling & Calum G. Turvey, 2003. "Further thoughts on the relationship between economic value added and stock market performance," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 255-267.
    11. Ahmad Ismail, 2006. "Is economic value added more associated with stock return than accounting earnings? The UK evidence," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 2(4), pages 343-353, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Arkadiusz Babczuk, 2022. "Can the Economic Value Added Be Used as the Universal Financial Metric?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Tracey West & Andrew Worthington, 1999. "The information content of economic value-added: A comparative analysis with earnings, cash flow and residual income," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 066, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    3. Peter Kien Pham & Jo-Ann Suchard & Jason Zein, 2011. "Corporate governance and alternative performance measures: evidence from Australian firms," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 36(3), pages 371-386, December.
    4. Ashita Agrawal & Pitabas Mohanty & Navindra Kumar Totala, 2019. "Does EVA Beat ROA and ROE in Explaining the Stock Returns in Indian Scenario? An Evidence Using Mixed Effects Panel Data Regression Model," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(2), pages 103-134, May.
    5. Adel Elgharbawy & Magdy Abdel-Kader, 2013. "Enterprise governance and value-based management: a theoretical contingency framework," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 99-129, February.
    6. Dimitris Kyriazis & Christos Anastassis, 2007. "The Validity of the Economic Value Added Approach: an Empirical Application," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 13(1), pages 71-100, January.
    7. Leo Vashkor Dewri, 2022. "A Critical Assessment of Interrelationship Among Corporate Governance, Financial Performance, Refined Economic Value Added to Measure Firm Value and Return on Stock," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2718-2759, December.
    8. David Sparling & Calum G. Turvey, 2003. "Further thoughts on the relationship between economic value added and stock market performance," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 255-267.
    9. Andrew C. Worthington & Tracey West, 2004. "Australian Evidence Concerning the Information Content of Economic Value-Added," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 29(2), pages 201-223, December.
    10. Sujata Behera, 2020. "Does the EVA valuation model explain the market value of equity better under changing required return than constant required return?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Elena Claudia Serban & Alexandru Bogeanu & Eugeniu Tudor, 2013. "Clustering Techniques In Financial Data Analysis Applications On The U.S. Financial Market," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 176-194, August.
    12. Andrew Worthington & Tracey West, 2000. "A Review and Synthesis of the Economic Value-Added Literature," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 075, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    13. Manju Tripathi & Smita Kashiramka & P. K. Jain, 2018. "Flexibility in Measuring Corporate Financial Performance, EVA Versus Conventional Earnings Measures: Evidences from India and China," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(2), pages 123-138, June.
    14. Oksana Melnyk, 2019. "Financial Innovation for Assessing the Enterprise Capitalization," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 95-99, September.
    15. Gabriela Chmelíková, 2011. "Framework of performance measurement system for Czech small breweries," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 167-176.
    16. Kothari, S. P., 2001. "Capital markets research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 105-231, September.
    17. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    18. Gabriela Chmelíková, 2013. "Performance factors of Czech brewing industry companies," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(2), pages 353-365.
    19. Dipasha Sharma, 2018. "Stock Market Performance and Efficiency of Banks in a Developing Economy: Evidence from the Indian Banking Sector," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 7(2), pages 178-193, July.
    20. Randolph Sloof & Mirjam van Praag, 2008. "The Degradation of Distorted Performance Measures," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-072/3, Tinbergen Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:26:y:2021:i:4:p:6312-6337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.