IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i8p5541-d1125474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Gender an Antecedent to Workplace Stressors? A Systematic Review and an Empirical Study Using a Person-Centred Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Fida

    (Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • David Watson

    (Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Valerio Ghezzi

    (Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Claudio Barbaranelli

    (Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Matteo Ronchetti

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy)

  • Cristina Di Tecco

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Objective: Work is a key domain of life in which gender inequality can manifest, yet gender is rarely the explicit focus of research seeking to understand exposure to stressors. We investigated this research gap in two studies. Methods: Study 1 was a systematic review of the relationship between gender and key stressors (e.g., high demands, poor support, lack of clarity and control). From a total of 13,376,130 papers met our inclusion criteria. Study 2 was a cross-sectional study that included 11,289 employees nested within 71 public organisations (50.6% men). Through a latent profile analysis, we investigated the profiles of stressors separately from men and women. Results: The systematic review revealed that, for all stressors, a significant proportion of studies found no significant gender differences, and the review found mixed evidence of greater exposure for both men and women. The results of Study 2 revealed that both genders could be optimally represented by three psychosocial risk profiles reflecting medium, low and high stressors. The results also showed that while the shape of profiles was similar for both genders, men had a higher probability than women of being in the virtuous (i.e., low stressors) profile, and the opposite pattern emerged for the average profile (i.e., medium levels of stressors). Men and women displayed the same likelihood of being classified in the at-risk profile (i.e., high levels of stressors). Conclusion: Gender differences in exposure to stressors are inconsistent. Although the literature on gender role theory and the gendering of work suggests different exposures to stressors in men and women, we find little empirical support for this.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Fida & David Watson & Valerio Ghezzi & Claudio Barbaranelli & Matteo Ronchetti & Cristina Di Tecco, 2023. "Is Gender an Antecedent to Workplace Stressors? A Systematic Review and an Empirical Study Using a Person-Centred Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:8:p:5541-:d:1125474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/8/5541/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/8/5541/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephan HUMPERT, 2016. "What Workers Want: Job Satisfaction In The U.S," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 39-45, March.
    2. Platt, Jonathan & Prins, Seth & Bates, Lisa & Keyes, Katherine, 2016. "Unequal depression for equal work? How the wage gap explains gendered disparities in mood disorders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-8.
    3. Giuseppe La Torre & Cristina Sestili & Alice Mannocci & Alessandra Sinopoli & Massimiliano De Paolis & Sara De Francesco & Laura Rapaccini & Marco Barone & Valentina Iodice & Bruno Lojodice & Sabina S, 2018. "Association between Work Related Stress and Health Related Quality of Life: The Impact of Socio-Demographic Variables. A Cross Sectional Study in a Region of Central Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, January.
    4. Amalia Stafyla & Georgia Kaltsidou & Nikolaos Spyridis, 2013. "Gender differences in work stress, related to organizational conflicts and organizational constrains: An empirical research," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 6(1), pages 91-101, April.
    5. Chiara Rollero & Angela Fedi & Norma Piccoli, 2016. "Gender or Occupational Status: What Counts More for Well-Being at Work?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(2), pages 467-480, September.
    6. Marchand, Alain & Bilodeau, Jaunathan & Demers, Andrée & Beauregard, Nancy & Durand, Pierre & Haines, Victor Y., 2016. "Gendered depression: Vulnerability or exposure to work and family stressors?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 160-168.
    7. Pilar Rivera-Torres & Rafael Angel Araque-Padilla & María José Montero-Simó, 2013. "Job Stress Across Gender: The Importance of Emotional and Intellectual Demands and Social Support in Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Jiro Takaki & Toshiyo Taniguchi & Kumi Hirokawa, 2013. "Associations of Workplace Bullying and Harassment with Pain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-11, September.
    9. Peter, Richard & March, Stefanie & du Prel, Jean-Baptist, 2016. "Are status inconsistency, work stress and work-family conflict associated with depressive symptoms? Testing prospective evidence in the lidA study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 100-109.
    10. Isabelle Niedhammer & Jean-François Chastang & Hélène Sultan-Taïeb & Greet Vermeylen & Agnès Parent-Thirion, 2013. "Psychosocial work factors and sickness absence in 31 countries in Europe," Post-Print halshs-01228084, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rémi Colin-Chevalier & Bruno Pereira & Amanda Clare Benson & Samuel Dewavrin & Thomas Cornet & Frédéric Dutheil, 2022. "The Protective Role of Job Control/Autonomy on Mental Strain of Managers: A Cross-Sectional Study among Wittyfit’s Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Bubonya, Melisa & Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Wooden, Mark, 2017. "Mental health and productivity at work: Does what you do matter?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 150-165.
    3. Song, Kyungeun & Lee, Min-Ah & Kim, Jinho, 2024. "Double jeopardy: Exploring the moderating effect of educational mismatch in the relationship between work-family conflict and depressive symptoms among Korean working women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    4. Christina Björklund & Therese Hellman & Irene Jensen & Cecilia Åkerblom & Elisabeth Björk Brämberg, 2019. "Workplace Bullying as Experienced by Managers and How They Cope: A Qualitative Study of Swedish Managers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Daniel, Carole & Gentina, Elodie & Mesmer-Magnus, Jessica, 2022. "Mindfulness buffers the deleterious effects of workaholism for work-family conflict," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    6. Belloni, Michele & Carrino, Ludovico & Meschi, Elena, 2022. "The impact of working conditions on mental health: Novel evidence from the UK," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Orawan Kaewboonchoo & Grace Sembajwe & Jian Li, 2018. "Associations between Job Strain and Arterial Stiffness: A Large Survey among Enterprise Employees from Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Federica Ghelli & Francesca Malandrone & Valeria Bellisario & Giulia Squillacioti & Marco Panizzolo & Nicoletta Colombi & Luca Ostacoli & Roberto Bono, 2022. "The Quality of Life and the Bio-Molecular Profile in Working Environment: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Cheryl Carleton & Mary T. Kelly, 2022. "Happy at Work - Possible at Any Age?," Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series 51, Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics.
    10. Giuseppe La Torre & Cristina Sestili & Alice Mannocci & Alessandra Sinopoli & Massimiliano De Paolis & Sara De Francesco & Laura Rapaccini & Marco Barone & Valentina Iodice & Bruno Lojodice & Sabina S, 2018. "Association between Work Related Stress and Health Related Quality of Life: The Impact of Socio-Demographic Variables. A Cross Sectional Study in a Region of Central Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, January.
    11. Jeroen Waal & Stijn Daenekindt & Willem Koster, 2017. "Statistical challenges in modelling the health consequences of social mobility: the need for diagonal reference models," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(9), pages 1029-1037, December.
    12. Rita de Cássia Akutsu & Ada Rocha & Victor Viana & Luiz Akutsu & Izabel Cristina Silva & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho & Heesup Han & António Raposo & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Luis Araya-Castillo & Renat, 2021. "Well-Being at Work: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Portuguese Nutritionists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Amna Anjum & Xu Ming & Ahmed Faisal Siddiqi & Samma Faiz Rasool, 2018. "An Empirical Study Analyzing Job Productivity in Toxic Workplace Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Ågotnes, Kari Wik & Skogstad, Anders & Hetland, Jørn & Olsen, Olav Kjellevold & Espevik, Roar & Bakker, Arnold B. & Einarsen, Ståle Valvatne, 2021. "Daily work pressure and exposure to bullying-related negative acts: The role of daily transformational and laissez-faire leadership," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 423-433.
    15. Patricia Concheiro-Moscoso & Betania Groba & Francisco José Martínez-Martínez & María del Carmen Miranda-Duro & Laura Nieto-Riveiro & Thais Pousada & Cristina Queirós & Javier Pereira, 2021. "Study for the Design of a Protocol to Assess the Impact of Stress in the Quality of Life of Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-11, February.
    16. Liana S. Leach & Lay San Too & Philip J. Batterham & Kim M. Kiely & Helen Christensen & Peter Butterworth, 2020. "Workplace Bullying and Suicidal Ideation: Findings from an Australian Longitudinal Cohort Study of Mid-Aged Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    17. Daoyan Guo & Hong Chen & Ruyin Long & Hui Lu & Qianyi Long, 2017. "A Co-Word Analysis of Organizational Constraints for Maintaining Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Rodrick Adams & Valentina Nino, 2024. "Work-Related Psychosocial Factors and Their Effects on Mental Workload Perception and Body Postures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-13, July.
    19. Chiara Rollero & Norma De Piccoli, 2020. "Myths about Intimate Partner Violence and Moral Disengagement: An Analysis of Sociocultural Dimensions Sustaining Violence against Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-11, November.
    20. Cokkie Verschuren & Maria Tims & Annet H. De Lange, 2023. "Beyond Bullying, Aggression, Discrimination, and Social Safety: Development of an Integrated Negative Work Behavior Questionnaire (INWBQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:8:p:5541-:d:1125474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.