IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p51-d1009640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Perceived Organizational Support Reduce the Effect of Working Environmental Risk on Occupational Strain? A Study of Chinese Geological Investigators

Author

Listed:
  • Su Tao

    (School of Marxism, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jinmiao Hao

    (School of Marxism, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jicong Yu

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Background: Sensitivity to working environmental risks is essential to ensure the safety of geological investigators, but persistent perceived risks may lead to occupational strain, with negative effects on physical and mental health. This study aimed to find ways to reduce the negative consequences of working environmental risk perception without losing situational awareness. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted with 268 participants from geological survey organizations, measuring their perception of working environmental risk, occupational strain, perceived organizational support, and other stressors. Results: (1) The perception of working environmental risk and occupational strain of geological investigators was significantly higher than that of administrative staff, managers, and scientific researchers. (2) Working environmental risk is an important predictor of occupational strain in geological investigators even after controlling for other stressors. (3) Different dimensions of perceived organizational support play different roles in stress management; socio-emotional support negatively predicts occupational strain, and instrumental support moderates the relationship between working environmental risk perception and occupational strain. Conclusions: Our findings identify working environmental risk as one of the most prominent stressors for geological investigators. Socio-emotional support directly reduces occupational strain, while instrumental support buffers the effect of risk perception on occupational strain.

Suggested Citation

  • Su Tao & Jinmiao Hao & Jicong Yu, 2022. "How Does Perceived Organizational Support Reduce the Effect of Working Environmental Risk on Occupational Strain? A Study of Chinese Geological Investigators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:51-:d:1009640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer E. C. Lee & Louise Lemyre, 2009. "A Social‐Cognitive Perspective of Terrorism Risk Perception and Individual Response in Canada," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9), pages 1265-1280, September.
    2. Elovainio, M. & Kivimäki, M. & Vahtera, J., 2002. "Organizational justice: Evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(1), pages 105-108.
    3. Mahmaod Alrawad & Abdalwali Lutfi & Sundus Alyatama & Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Mohammed Amin Almaiah, 2022. "Perception of Occupational and Environmental Risks and Hazards among Mineworkers: A Psychometric Paradigm Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Hongshan Lai & Md Altab Hossin & Jieyun Li & Ruping Wang & Md Sajjad Hosain, 2022. "Examining the Relationship between COVID-19 Related Job Stress and Employees’ Turnover Intention with the Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support: Evidence from SMEs in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lorene Gonçalves Coelho & Priscila Ribas de Farias Costa & Luana de Oliveira Leite & Karin Eleonora Sávio de Oliveira & Rita de Cássia Coelho de Almeida Akutsu, 2023. "The Effects of Workplace Stressors on Dietary Patterns among Workers at a Private Hospital in Recôncavo of Bahia, Brazil: A Longitudinal Study before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriele Prati & Luca Pietrantoni, 2016. "Knowledge, Risk Perceptions, and Xenophobic Attitudes: Evidence from Italy During the Ebola Outbreak," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(10), pages 2000-2010, October.
    2. Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alrawad, Mahmaod & Alsyouf, Adi & Almaiah, Mohammed Amin & Al-Khasawneh, Ahmad & Al-Khasawneh, Akif Lutfi & Alshira'h, Ahmad Farhan & Alshirah, Malek Hamed & Saad, Mohamed & Ibrahim, 2023. "Drivers and impact of big data analytic adoption in the retail industry: A quantitative investigation applying structural equation modeling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Zeng, Yadi & Xiao, Gensen & Ye, Baojuan & Zhang, Yanzhen & Liu, Mingfan & Wang, Xinqiang & Yang, Qiang, 2022. "The relationship between risk perception of COVID-19 and willingness to help: A moderated mediation model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Levine, Cynthia S. & Miller, Gregory E. & Shalowitz, Madeleine U. & Story, Rachel E. & Manczak, Erika M. & Hayen, Robin & Hoffer, Lauren C. & Le, Van & Vause, Katherine J. & Chen, Edith, 2019. "Academic disparities and health: How gender-based disparities in schools relate to boys' and girls’ health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 126-134.
    5. Alder, G. Stoney & Ambrose, Maureen L., 2005. "An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 161-177, July.
    6. Alrawad, Mahmaod & Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alyatama, Sundus & Al Khattab, Adel & Alsoboa, Sliman S. & Almaiah, Mohammed Amin & Ramadan, Mujtaba Hashim & Arafa, Hussin Mostafa & Ahmed, Nazar Ali & Alsyouf, , 2023. "Assessing customers perception of online shopping risks: A structural equation modeling–based multigroup analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Mohamed Algezawy & Mohanad M. S. Ghaleb & Shaimaa A. Mohamed & Alaa M. S. Azazz, 2023. "The Impact of Social Loafing on Turnover Intention for Tourism Employees Post COVID-19: The Mediating Role of Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Resti Tito Villarino, 2023. "Online Typhoon Preparedness and Mitigation Program: Fitness-for-Purpose Process," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 43(1), pages 647-667, May.
    9. Tianjun Feng & L. Robin Keller & Ping Wu & Yifan Xu, 2014. "An Empirical Study of the Toxic Capsule Crisis in China: Risk Perceptions and Behavioral Responses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 698-710, April.
    10. Matt Baucum & Heather Rosoff & Richard John & William Burns & Paul Slovic, 2018. "Modeling public responses to soft-target transportation terror," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 239-249, June.
    11. Trujillo Flores Mara Maricela & Rivas Tovar Luis Arturo & Lambarry Vilchis Fernando, 2014. "Mobbing: A theoretical model quantifying factors affecting the role of women executives in the institutions of public education in Mexico," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 59(1), pages 195-228, enero-mar.
    12. Heponiemi, Tarja & Manderbacka, Kristiina & Vänskä, Jukka & Elovainio, Marko, 2013. "Can organizational justice help the retention of general practitioners?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 22-28.
    13. Robert Giacalone & Mark Promislo, 2010. "Unethical and Unwell: Decrements in Well-Being and Unethical Activity at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 275-297, January.
    14. Guillaume Soenen & Tessa Melkonian & Maureen L. Ambrose, 2017. "To Shift or Not to Shift? : Determinants and Consequences of Phase-Shifting on Justice Judgments," Post-Print hal-02276701, HAL.
    15. Hyunsuk Liu & Changjun Lee & Keungoui Kim & Junmin Lee & Ahram Moon & Daeho Lee & Myeongjun Park, 2023. "An Analysis of Factors Influencing the Intention to Use “Untact” Services by Service Type," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Cokkie Verschuren & Maria Tims & Annet H. De Lange, 2023. "Beyond Bullying, Aggression, Discrimination, and Social Safety: Development of an Integrated Negative Work Behavior Questionnaire (INWBQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-24, August.
    17. Yumiko Kobayashi & Naoki Kondo, 2019. "Organizational justice, psychological distress, and stress-related behaviors by occupational class in female Japanese employees," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.
    18. Kolotylo-Kulkarni, Malgorzata & Marakas, George M. & Xia, Weidong, 2024. "Understanding protective behavior and vaccination adoption among US individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A four-wave longitudinal study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    19. Martin Gächter & David A. Savage & Benno Torgler, 2009. "Gender Variations of Physiolocical and Psychological Stress Among Police Officers," CREMA Working Paper Series 2009-27, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    20. Erebouni Arakelian & Sofia Paulsson & Fredrik Molin & Magnus Svartengren, 2021. "How Human Resources Index, Relational Justice, and Perceived Productivity Change after Reorganization at a Hospital in Sweden That Uses a Structured Support Model for Systematic Work Environment Manag," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:51-:d:1009640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.