IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1102-d728400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anthropometric, Physiological, and Psychological Variables That Determine the Elite Pistol Performance of Women

Author

Listed:
  • Vahid Sobhani

    (Exercise Physiology Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1435916471, Iran)

  • Mohammadjavad Rostamizadeh

    (Exercise Physiology Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1435916471, Iran)

  • Seyed Morteza Hosseini

    (Medicine, Quran and Hadith Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1435916471, Iran)

  • Seyed Ebrahim Hashemi

    (Exercise Physiology Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1435916471, Iran)

  • Ignacio Refoyo Román

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte (INEF—Sports Department), Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Daniel Mon-López

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte (INEF—Sports Department), Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Shooting is a high-precision sport that depends on many factors to achieve high performance levels. The main objective of this study was to analyze the differences in anthropometric, physiological, and psychological variables by sport level in women air-pistol shooters. Fifteen female pistol shooters, including seven elite national shooters of Iran and eight non-elite shooters, participated in this study. Analyzed variables were grouped into three sections: anthropometric, physiological, and psychological. Anthropometric variables included: height, weight, body mass index, length of leg, arm span, and proportions between variables. Physiological tests include resting heart rate, static and dynamic balance, flexibility, and upper body strength. Additionally, psychological questionnaires of SMS-6 sport motivation, TSCI trait sport-confidence and SSCI state sport-confidence, ACSI-28 athletic coping skills, and SAS sport anxiety scale were used. The Shapiro–Wilks test and independent t-test were used to analyze the data. Effect size and test reliability were calculated using Cohen’s d and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. Our results showed that elite shooters have higher values of dynamic balance (Y-test), upper body strength (sit-ups), and intrinsic motivation, and lower resting heart rate than non-elite. However, no differences were found in the anthropometric variables, nor in anxiety or coping skills. We conclude that physiological and psychological workouts should be included in the shooters’ training programs to improve their performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Vahid Sobhani & Mohammadjavad Rostamizadeh & Seyed Morteza Hosseini & Seyed Ebrahim Hashemi & Ignacio Refoyo Román & Daniel Mon-López, 2022. "Anthropometric, Physiological, and Psychological Variables That Determine the Elite Pistol Performance of Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1102-:d:728400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1102/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1102/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F Rodrigues & R Macedo & DS Teixeira & L Cid & D Monteiro, 2020. "Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1335-1350, August.
    2. Francisco Moreira da Silva & Paulo Malico Sousa & Valter Bruno Pinheiro & Olga López-Torres & Ignacio Refoyo Roman & Daniel Mon-López, 2021. "Which Are the Most Determinant Psychological Factors in Olympic Shooting Performance? A Self-Perspective from Elite Shooters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Alexander Ahammer & Mario Lackner & Jasmin Voigt, 2019. "Does confidence enhance performance? Causal evidence from the field," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(6), pages 704-717, September.
    4. Daniel Mon & María S Zakynthinaki & Carlos A Cordente & Antonio J Monroy Antón & Bárbara Rodríguez Rodríguez & David López Jiménez, 2015. "Finger Flexor Force Influences Performance in Senior Male Air Pistol Olympic Shooting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-6, June.
    5. Elisabeth Deutskens & Ko de Ruyter & Martin Wetzels & Paul Oosterveld, 2004. "Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 21-36, February.
    6. Daniel Mon-López & Francisco Moreira da Silva & Santiago Calero Morales & Olga López-Torres & Jorge Lorenzo Calvo, 2019. "What Do Olympic Shooters Think about Physical Training Factors and Their Performance?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter C. Terry & Renée L. Parsons-Smith & Albertas Skurvydas & Aušra Lisinskienė & Daiva Majauskienė & Dovilė Valančienė & Sydney Cooper & Marc Lochbaum, 2022. "Physical Activity and Healthy Habits Influence Mood Profile Clusters in a Lithuanian Population," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Peter C. Terry & Albertas Skurvydas & Ausra Lisinskiene & Daiva Majauskiene & Dovile Valanciene & Sydney Cooper & Marc Lochbaum, 2022. "Validation of a Lithuanian-Language Version of the Brunel Mood Scale: The BRUMS-LTU," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srinivasan, V. Seenu & Netzer, Oded, 2007. "Adaptive Self-Explication of Multi-attribute Preferences," Research Papers 1979, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    2. Tatsushi Fukaya & Masayuki Suzuki & Ikumi Ozawa & Takumi Nakagoshi, 2022. "An Examination of Related Factors of Mathematical Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Elementary School Teachers: Focusing on Conceptions of Teaching and Learning and Test Utilization Strategy," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    3. Lusk, Jayson L., 2012. "The political ideology of food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 530-542.
    4. Rolf Becker, 2023. "Short- and long-term effects of reminders on panellists’ survey participation in a probability-based panel study with a sequential mixed-mode design," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4095-4119, October.
    5. Giulia Mascarello & Anna Pinto & Stefania Crovato & Barbara Tiozzo Pezzoli & Marco Pietropaoli & Michela Bertola & Franco Mutinelli & Giovanni Formato, 2024. "Consumers’ Perceptions and Behaviors Regarding Honey Purchases and Expectations on Traceability and Sustainability in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Barbara Ryan & Rachel King, 2020. "How ready is ready? Measuring physical preparedness for severe storms," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 171-199, October.
    7. Yang Liu & Jan Hannig & Abhishek Pal Majumder, 2019. "Second-Order Probability Matching Priors for the Person Parameter in Unidimensional IRT Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 701-718, September.
    8. Elisabeth Deutskens & Ad Jong & Ko Ruyter & Martin Wetzels, 2006. "Comparing the generalizability of online and mail surveys in cross-national service quality research," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 119-136, April.
    9. Daniel Mon-López & Alfonso de la Rubia Riaza & Mónica Hontoria Galán & Ignacio Refoyo Roman, 2020. "The Impact of Covid-19 and the Effect of Psychological Factors on Training Conditions of Handball Players," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Janose Osedeme & Robert Barron & Christian Salmon & Joseph Ekong, 2024. "An Electric Vehicle Adoption Model for Nigeria—A Fuzzy MCDA Policy Analysis Tool with Implications for Developing Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Giancarlo Condello & Laura Capranica & Mojca Doupona & Kinga Varga & Verena Burk, 2019. "Dual-career through the elite university student-athletes’ lenses: The international FISU-EAS survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.
    12. María del Mar Serrano-Arcos & Raquel Sánchez-Fernández & Juan Carlos Pérez-Mesa, 2021. "Analysis of Product-Country Image from Consumer’s Perspective: The Impact of Subjective Knowledge, Perceived Risk and Media Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Björn Hofman & Gerdien de Vries & Geerten van de Kaa, 2022. "Keeping Things as They Are: How Status Quo Biases and Traditions along with a Lack of Information Transparency in the Building Industry Slow Down the Adoption of Innovative Sustainable Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Bader, Benjamin & Berg, Nicola & Holtbrügge, Dirk, 2015. "Expatriate performance in terrorism-endangered countries: The role of family and organizational support," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 849-860.
    15. Wells, Victoria K. & Manika, Danae & Gregory-Smith, Diana & Taheri, Babak & McCowlen, Clair, 2015. "Heritage tourism, CSR and the role of employee environmental behaviour," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 399-413.
    16. Selmi, Noureddine & Chaney, Damien, 2018. "A measure of revenue management orientation and its mediating role in the relationship between market orientation and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 99-109.
    17. Toepoel, V. & Das, J.W.M. & van Soest, A.H.O., 2005. "Design of Web Questionnaires : A Test for Number of Items per Screen," Discussion Paper 2005-114, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    18. Olivier Toubia & Eric Johnson & Theodoros Evgeniou & Philippe Delquié, 2013. "Dynamic Experiments for Estimating Preferences: An Adaptive Method of Eliciting Time and Risk Parameters," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 613-640, June.
    19. Philip X Fuchs & Mojca Doupona & Kinga Varga & Marta Bon & Cristina Cortis & Andrea Fusco & Loriana Castellani & Niko Niemisalo & Heikki Hannola & Patrice Giron & Jörg Förster & Laura Capranica & Herb, 2021. "Multi-national perceptions on challenges, opportunities, and support structures for Dual Career migrations in European student-athletes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Zsombor Szádoczki & Sándor Bozóki & Patrik Juhász & Sergii V. Kadenko & Vitaliy Tsyganok, 2023. "Incomplete pairwise comparison matrices based on graphs with average degree approximately 3," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 783-807, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1102-:d:728400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.