IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v54y2020i4d10.1007_s11135-020-00988-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ

Author

Listed:
  • F Rodrigues

    (Sport Science School of Rio Maior (ESDRM-IPSantarém)
    Life Quality Research Center (CIEQV)
    Research Center in Sport, Health and Human Development (CIDESD))

  • R Macedo

    (Center for Organizational and Social Studies of P. PORTO, (CEOS.PP P. PORTO))

  • DS Teixeira

    (Lusófona University of Humanities and Technology (ULHT)
    Interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER))

  • L Cid

    (Research Center in Sport, Health and Human Development (CIDESD))

  • D Monteiro

    (Sport Science School of Rio Maior (ESDRM-IPSantarém)
    Research Center in Sport, Health and Human Development (CIDESD))

Abstract

This study aimed to test whether the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire and the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire can measure the same constructs in an equivalent manner. Advanced statistical procedures were used to examine if these scales could be interchangeably applied to the sport and the exercise context. In total, 2256 individuals (athletes = 1099; exercisers = 1157) completed translated and validated questionnaires measuring all types of motivation based on Self-Determination Theory. Several measurement models were tested, such as confirmatory factor models, exploratory structural equation models, and bifactor specifications. The exploratory structural equation modelling approach provided the best fit to the data in both groups. Multigroup analysis was performed within samples and between athletes and exercisers. Measurement model invariance was confirmed between samples from the same context; however, it did not achieve equivalence between scales. We hope this examination of context invariance analysis using specific validated scales can further help advance conceptual understanding of the measurement in sport and exercise.

Suggested Citation

  • F Rodrigues & R Macedo & DS Teixeira & L Cid & D Monteiro, 2020. "Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1335-1350, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:54:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-020-00988-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-020-00988-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-020-00988-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-020-00988-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inmaculada Tornero-Quiñones & Jesús Sáez-Padilla & Estefanía Castillo Viera & Juan José García Ferrete & Ángela Sierra Robles, 2019. "Risk of Dependence on Sport in Relation to Body Dissatisfaction and Motivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Albert Satorra & Peter Bentler, 2010. "Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 243-248, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Haid & Elisabeth Nöhammer & Julia N. Albrecht & Alexander Plaikner & Harald Stummer & Peter Heimerl, 2021. "Health Promotion as a Motivational Factor in Alpine Cycling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Vahid Sobhani & Mohammadjavad Rostamizadeh & Seyed Morteza Hosseini & Seyed Ebrahim Hashemi & Ignacio Refoyo Román & Daniel Mon-López, 2022. "Anthropometric, Physiological, and Psychological Variables That Determine the Elite Pistol Performance of Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Elisa Cavicchiolo & Maurizio Sibilio & Fabio Lucidi & Mauro Cozzolino & Andrea Chirico & Laura Girelli & Sara Manganelli & Francesco Giancamilli & Federica Galli & Pierluigi Diotaiuti & Arnaldo Zelli , 2022. "The Psychometric Properties of the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-3): Factorial Structure, Invariance and Validity in the Italian Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Csilla Horváth & Feray Adigüzel & Hester van Herk, 2013. "Cultural Aspects Of Compulsive Buying In Emerging And Developed Economies: A Cross Cultural Study In Compulsive Buying," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 4(2).
    3. Anastasia Stathopoulou & Tommy Kweku Quansah & George Balabanis, 2022. "The Blinding Effects of Team Identification on Sports Corruption: Cross-Cultural Evidence from Sub-Saharan African Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 511-529, August.
    4. Balabanis, George & Stathopoulou, Anastasia, 2021. "The price of social status desire and public self-consciousness in luxury consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 463-475.
    5. Mirjam Braßler & Martin Schultze, 2021. "Students’ Innovation in Education for Sustainable Development—A Longitudinal Study on Interdisciplinary vs. Monodisciplinary Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Lars Petersen & Jacob Hörisch & Kathleen Jacobs, 2021. "Worse is worse and better doesn't matter?: The effects of favorable and unfavorable environmental information on consumers’ willingness to pay," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1338-1356, October.
    7. João Fidalgo & João Botelho & Luís Proença & José João Mendes & Vanessa Machado & Ana Sintra Delgado, 2022. "Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-8, August.
    8. Antonio J. Rodríguez-Hidalgo & Anabel Alcívar & Mauricio Herrera-López, 2019. "Traditional Bullying and Discriminatory Bullying Around Special Educational Needs: Psychometric Properties of Two Instruments to Measure It," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Frías-Jamilena, Dolores M. & Sabiote-Ortiz, Carmen M. & Martín-Santana, Josefa D. & Beerli-Palacio, Asunción, 2018. "The effect of Cultural Intelligence on consumer-based destination brand equity," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 22-36.
    10. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Fredrich, Viktor, 2016. "Business model innovation in alliances: Successful configurations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3584-3590.
    11. Olenka Dworakowski & Zilla M. Huber & Tabea Meier & Ryan L. Boyd & Mike Martin & Andrea B. Horn, 2022. "You Do Not Have to Get through This Alone: Interpersonal Emotion Regulation and Psychosocial Resources during the COVID-19 Pandemic across Four Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Chen, Tingting & Li, Fuli & Chen, Xiao-Ping & Ou, Zhanying, 2018. "Innovate or die: How should knowledge-worker teams respond to technological turbulence?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-16.
    13. Díaz, Estrella & Martín-Consuegra, David & Esteban, Águeda, 2015. "Perceptions of service cannibalisation: The moderating effect of the type of travel agency," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 329-342.
    14. Sen Sendjaya & Nathan Eva & Ivan Butar Butar & Mulyadi Robin & Samantha Castles, 2019. "SLBS-6: Validation of a Short Form of the Servant Leadership Behavior Scale," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 941-956, June.
    15. Joana R. Casanova & Leandro S. Almeida & Francisco Peixoto & Rui-Bártolo Ribeiro & João Marôco, 2019. "Academic Expectations Questionnaire: A Proposal for a Short Version," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440188, January.
    16. Riquelme, Isabel P. & Román, Sergio & Cuestas, Pedro J. & Iacobucci, Dawn, 2019. "The Dark Side of Good Reputation and Loyalty in Online Retailing: When Trust Leads to Retaliation through Price Unfairness," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 35-52.
    17. Sara Speybroeck & Sofie Kuppens & Jan Van Damme & Peter Van Petegem & Carl Lamote & Tinneke Boonen & Jerissa de Bilde, 2012. "The Role of Teachers' Expectations in the Association between Children's SES and Performance in Kindergarten: A Moderated Mediation Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-8, April.
    18. Majid Ghasemy & Hazri Jamil & James E. Gaskin, 2021. "Have your cake and eat it too: PLSe2 = ML + PLS," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 497-541, April.
    19. Álvaro-Francisco Morote & María Hernández, 2022. "What Do School Children Know about Climate Change? A Social Sciences Approach," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Majid Ghasemy, 2022. "Estimating models with independent observed variables based on the PLSe2 methodology: a Monte Carlo simulation study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4129-4159, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:54:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-020-00988-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.