IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i4p21582440221131263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Examination of Related Factors of Mathematical Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Elementary School Teachers: Focusing on Conceptions of Teaching and Learning and Test Utilization Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Tatsushi Fukaya
  • Masayuki Suzuki
  • Ikumi Ozawa
  • Takumi Nakagoshi

Abstract

We examined the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) test scores and elementary school teachers’ psychological variables, conceptions of teaching and learning and test utilization strategy, for mathematics. Through a web-based survey, participants responded to a six-item descriptive PCK test and to inventories of conceptions of teaching and learning and test utilization strategy. Data from 297 elementary school teachers were analyzed for associations with PCK scores. The results showed that constructivist conceptions and test utilization strategy were positively correlated with PCK test scores, and traditional conceptions were negatively correlated. In addition, the results of multiple regression analysis showed that traditional conception and test utilization strategy each showed unique associations with the PCK test. These results suggest the importance of teachers’ beliefs and test utilization strategies as related variables of teachers’ PCK.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatsushi Fukaya & Masayuki Suzuki & Ikumi Ozawa & Takumi Nakagoshi, 2022. "An Examination of Related Factors of Mathematical Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Elementary School Teachers: Focusing on Conceptions of Teaching and Learning and Test Utilization Strategy," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:21582440221131263
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221131263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221131263
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221131263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeki Aksu & Ãœmit Kul, 2019. "The Mediating Role of Mathematics Teaching Efficacy on the Relationships Between Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Mathematics Teaching Anxiety," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, August.
    2. Elisabeth Deutskens & Ko de Ruyter & Martin Wetzels & Paul Oosterveld, 2004. "Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 21-36, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vahid Sobhani & Mohammadjavad Rostamizadeh & Seyed Morteza Hosseini & Seyed Ebrahim Hashemi & Ignacio Refoyo Román & Daniel Mon-López, 2022. "Anthropometric, Physiological, and Psychological Variables That Determine the Elite Pistol Performance of Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-10, January.
    2. Giancarlo Condello & Laura Capranica & Mojca Doupona & Kinga Varga & Verena Burk, 2019. "Dual-career through the elite university student-athletes’ lenses: The international FISU-EAS survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Bader, Benjamin & Berg, Nicola & Holtbrügge, Dirk, 2015. "Expatriate performance in terrorism-endangered countries: The role of family and organizational support," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 849-860.
    4. Olivier Toubia & Eric Johnson & Theodoros Evgeniou & Philippe Delquié, 2013. "Dynamic Experiments for Estimating Preferences: An Adaptive Method of Eliciting Time and Risk Parameters," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 613-640, June.
    5. Philip X Fuchs & Mojca Doupona & Kinga Varga & Marta Bon & Cristina Cortis & Andrea Fusco & Loriana Castellani & Niko Niemisalo & Heikki Hannola & Patrice Giron & Jörg Förster & Laura Capranica & Herb, 2021. "Multi-national perceptions on challenges, opportunities, and support structures for Dual Career migrations in European student-athletes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Elena-Loreni Baciu & Delia Vîrgă & Theofild-Andrei Lazăr & Delia Gligor & Cecilia-Nicoleta Jurcuț, 2020. "The Association between Entrepreneurial Perceived Behavioral Control, Personality, Empathy, and Assertiveness in a Romanian Sample of Nascent Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Heider, Raphael & Moeller, Sabine, 2012. "Outlet patronage in on-the-go consumption: An analysis of patronage preference drivers for convenience outlets versus traditional retail outlets," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 313-324.
    8. Bürgel, Tobias R. & Hiebl, Martin R.W. & Pielsticker, David I., 2023. "Digitalization and entrepreneurial firms' resilience to pandemic crises: Evidence from COVID-19 and the German Mittelstand," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    9. Harrigan, Paul & Soutar, Geoff & Choudhury, Musfiq Mannan & Lowe, Michelle, 2015. "Modelling CRM in a social media age," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 27-37.
    10. Alho, Eeva, 2015. "The effect of social bonding and identity on the decision to invest in food production," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 47-55.
    11. Francisco Liñán & Inmaculada Jaén & Domingo Martín, 2022. "Does entrepreneurship fit her? Women entrepreneurs, gender-role orientation, and entrepreneurial culture," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1051-1071, February.
    12. Premazzi, Katia & Castaldo, Sandro & Grosso, Monica & Hofacker, Charles, 2010. "Supporting retailers to exploit online settings for internationalization: The different role of trust and compensation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 229-240.
    13. Peters, Twan & Işık, Öykü & Tona, Olgerta & Popovič, Aleš, 2016. "How system quality influences mobile BI use: The mediating role of engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 773-783.
    14. Hui-Chih Wang & Her-Sen Doong, 2008. "Nine issues for Internet-based survey research in service industries," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(14), pages 2387-2399, October.
    15. Ragona, M. & Raley, M. & Sijtsema, S.J. & Frewer, L.J., 2013. "Better communication for successful food technology development: A Delphi study," 2013 Second Congress, June 6-7, 2013, Parma, Italy 151597, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    16. Brüggen, Elisabeth & Dholakia, Utpal M., 2010. "Determinants of Participation and Response Effort in Web Panel Surveys," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 239-250.
    17. Jin Haomiao & Kapteyn Arie, 2022. "Relationship Between Past Survey Burden and Response Probability to a New Survey in a Probability-Based Online Panel," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 38(4), pages 1051-1067, December.
    18. Islam, Shahidul & Tanasiuk, Evan, 2012. "Differential response on pre- and post-disclosed committed inducements in a face to face interview," MPRA Paper 107276, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2012.
    19. Jack, Claire & Miller, Ana Corina & Ashfield, Austen & Anderson, Duncan, 2019. "New entrants and succession into farming: A Northern Ireland perspective," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 8(2), August.
    20. Bentley, Tim A. & Cater, Carl & Page, Stephen J., 2010. "Adventure and ecotourism safety in Queensland: Operator experiences and practice," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 563-571.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:21582440221131263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.