IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15085-d974230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dissemination of Parent–Child Interaction Therapy in West Virginia during the Opioid Epidemic and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lindsay R. Druskin

    (Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Robin C. Han

    (Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Sharon T. Phillips

    (Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Erinn J. Victory

    (Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Emily Aman

    (Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Jennifer Tiano

    (Department of Psychology, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755, USA)

  • Jocelyn Stokes

    (Department Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, School of Medicine Eastern Division, West Virginia University, Martinsburg, WV 25401, USA)

  • Cheryl B. McNeil

    (Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
    Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA)

Abstract

The devastating impact of the opioid crisis on children and families in West Virginia was compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic and brought to light the critical need for greater mental health services and providers in the state. Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is an evidence-based treatment for child externalizing symptoms that teaches parents positive and appropriate strategies to manage child behaviors. The current qualitative study details barriers and facilitators to disseminating and implementing PCIT with opioid-impacted families across West Virginia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therapists ( n = 34) who participated in PCIT training and consultation through a State Opioid Response grant were asked to provide data about their experiences with PCIT training, consultation, and implementation. Almost all therapists (91%) reported barriers to telehealth PCIT (e.g., poor internet connection, unpredictability of sessions). Nearly half of therapists’ cases (45%) were impacted directly by parental substance use. Qualitative findings about the impact of telehealth and opioid use on PCIT implementation are presented. The dissemination and implementation of PCIT in a state greatly impacted by poor telehealth capacity and the opioid epidemic differed from the implementation of PCIT training and treatment delivery in other states, highlighting the critical importance of exploring implementation factors in rural settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindsay R. Druskin & Robin C. Han & Sharon T. Phillips & Erinn J. Victory & Emily Aman & Jennifer Tiano & Jocelyn Stokes & Cheryl B. McNeil, 2022. "The Dissemination of Parent–Child Interaction Therapy in West Virginia during the Opioid Epidemic and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15085-:d:974230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15085/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15085/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robin H. Gurwitch & Christina M. Warner-Metzger, 2022. "Trauma-Directed Interaction (TDI): An Adaptation to Parent-Child Interaction Therapy for Families with a History of Trauma," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Egan, Ryan & Wilsie, Carisa & Thompson, Yutian & Funderburk, Beverly & Bard, Elizabeth, 2020. "A community evaluation of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy for children with prenatal substance exposure," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Chase, Rhea M. & Carmody, Karen Appleyard & Lent, Maria & Murphy, Robert & Amaya-Jackson, Lisa & Wray, Erika & Ake, George S. & Sullivan, Kelly & White, Darden & Gurwitch, Robin & Murray, Kathryn, 2019. "Disseminating parent-child interaction therapy through the learning collaborative model on the adoption and implementation of an evidence-based treatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 131-141.
    4. Beveridge, Ryan M. & Fowles, Timothy R. & Masse, Joshua J. & McGoron, Lucy & Smith, Marissa A. & Parrish, Brendt P. & Circo, Gina & Widdoes, Nancy, 2015. "State-wide dissemination and implementation of parent–child interaction therapy (PCIT): Application of theory," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 38-48.
    5. Phillips, Sharon & Mychailyszyn, Matthew, 2021. "A review of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT): Applications for youth anxiety," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Joseph Henrich & Steven J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan, 2010. "Most people are not WEIRD," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7302), pages 29-29, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.
    2. Bouma, J.A. & Nguyen, Binh & van der Heijden, Eline & Dijk, J.J., 2018. "Analysing Group Contract Design Using a Lab and a Lab-in-the-Field Threshold Public Good Experiment," Discussion Paper 2018-049, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Grosch, Kerstin & Fischer, Sabine, 2024. "Gender equivalence in overconfidence A large-scale experimental study in a non-WEIRD country," Department for Strategy and Innovation Working Paper Series 02/2024, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. Valencia Caicedo, Felipe & Dohmen, Thomas & Pondorfer, Andreas, 2023. "Religion and cooperation across the globe," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 479-489.
    5. Sahba Besharati & Rufus Akinyemi, 2023. "Accelerating African neuroscience to provide an equitable framework using perspectives from West and Southern Africa," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-4, December.
    6. Markussen, Thomas & Sharma, Smriti & Singhal, Saurabh & Tarp, Finn, 2021. "Inequality, institutions and cooperation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Voigt, Stefan, 2022. "Determinant of Social Norms," ILE Working Paper Series 58, University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics.
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:6:p:1392-1412 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Ahn, T.K. & Ostrom, Elinor & Walker, James, 2010. "A common-pool resource experiment with postgraduate subjects from 41 countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2624-2633, October.
    10. Ran Xu & Navid Ghaffarzadegan, 2018. "Neuroscience bridging scientific disciplines in health: Who builds the bridge, who pays for it?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1183-1204, November.
    11. Cornand, Camille & Hubert, Paul, 2020. "On the external validity of experimental inflation forecasts: A comparison with five categories of field expectations," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    12. Andrea Bizzego & Mengyu Lim & Greta Schiavon & Gianluca Esposito, 2020. "Children with Developmental Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: More Neglected and Physically Punished," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Michael Muthukrishna & Joseph Henrich & Wataru Toyokawa & Takeshi Hamamura & Tatsuya Kameda & Steven J Heine, 2018. "Overconfidence is universal? Elicitation of Genuine Overconfidence (EGO) procedure reveals systematic differences across domain, task knowledge, and incentives in four populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-30, August.
    14. Renaud Foucart & Jonathan H. W. Tan, 2024. "A test of loyalty," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 109-137, August.
    15. James Derbyshire & Mandeep Dhami & Ian Belton & Dilek Önkal, 2023. "The value of experiments in futures and foresight science as illustrated by the case of scenario planning," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), June.
    16. Monic Sun & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang & Feng Zhu, 2012. "To Belong or to Be Different? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment in China," Working Papers 12-15, NET Institute, revised Oct 2012.
    17. Ingo S. Seifert & Julia M. Rohrer & Boris Egloff & Stefan C. Schmukle, 2021. "The Development of the Rank-Order Stability of the Big Five across the Life Span," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1156, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    18. Sara Miñarro & Victoria Reyes-García & Shankar Aswani & Samiya Selim & Christopher P Barrington-Leigh & Eric D Galbraith, 2021. "Happy without money: Minimally monetized societies can exhibit high subjective well-being," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Bria Long & Judith E. Fan & Holly Huey & Zixian Chai & Michael C. Frank, 2024. "Parallel developmental changes in children’s production and recognition of line drawings of visual concepts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Manpreet Blessin & Sophie Lehmann & Angela M. Kunzler & Rolf van Dick & Klaus Lieb, 2022. "Resilience Interventions Conducted in Western and Eastern Countries—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-25, June.
    21. Shawn Grover & John F. Helliwell, 2019. "How’s Life at Home? New Evidence on Marriage and the Set Point for Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 373-390, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15085-:d:974230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.