IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14378-d961829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

It Is Better for Younger Workers: The Gain Cycle between Job Crafting and Work Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Topa

    (Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago de Chile 7500000, Chile)

  • Mercedes Aranda-Carmena

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Job Crafting has been proposed as a new perspective, consisting in a bottom-up strategy to achieve person–job fit by emphasizing employees’ active participation and spontaneous change in job design, which is specifically adequate for older workers. Despite this fact, the cyclical influence between Work Engagement and Job Crafting over time has been less researched. We postulated that a gain cycle could be observed in the relationships between Job Crafting and its outcomes. Hence, we tested a longitudinal moderated mediation model in which Work Engagement increases over time through an increment in Job Crafting behaviors (Hypothesis 1), while this process is moderated by workers’ age (Hypothesis 2). The present study follows a three-wave design where participants ( N = 126) responded to online surveys at three measurement waves, three months apart. At Time 1 and Time 3, we assessed Work Engagement, Job Crafting behavior, and demographic variables, while at Time 2 we only assessed Job Crafting. Our findings partially differ from what was expected. The findings supported that the relationship between Work Engagement at Time 1 and changes in Job Crafting behavior across time was negative and non-significant, failing to provide support for Hypothesis 1. Related to Hypothesis 2, our results are mixed. Although the interaction between changes in Job Crafting and workers’ age did not demonstrate a statistical influence on Work Engagement at Time 3, our findings suggested that the direct influence was complemented by a negative indirect effect through the longitudinal increase of Job Crafting, which mainly affects aged workers. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Topa & Mercedes Aranda-Carmena, 2022. "It Is Better for Younger Workers: The Gain Cycle between Job Crafting and Work Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14378-:d:961829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsin Bashir & Ammarah Hameed & Muhammad Waseem Bari & Raza Ullah, 2021. "The Impact of Age-Diverse Workforce on Organization Performance: Mediating Role of Job Crafting," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, March.
    2. Enrique Robledo & Salvatore Zappalà & Gabriela Topa, 2019. "Job Crafting as a Mediator between Work Engagement and Wellbeing Outcomes: A Time-Lagged Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Mercedes Aranda & Salvatore Zappalà & Gabriela Topa, 2019. "Motivations for Volunteerism, Satisfaction, and Emotional Exhaustion: The Moderating Effect of Volunteers’ Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. César Merino-Soto & Milagros Lozano-Huamán & Sadith Lima-Mendoza & Gustavo Calderón de la Cruz & Arturo Juárez-García & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Ultrashort Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3): A Psychometric Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiatong Wang & Yong Xiong & Majid Murad & Naveed Iqbal Chaudhary & Hira Waqar, 2023. "Role of Online Time-Spatial Job Crafting and Leisure Crafting on Remote Work Performance through Tele-Pressure and Techno-Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Greta Mazzetti & Dina Guglielmi & Wilmar B. Schaufeli, 2020. "Same Involvement, Different Reasons: How Personality Factors and Organizations Contribute to Heavy Work Investment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Jesús Farfán & Marta Peña & Samuel Fernández-Salinero & Gabriela Topa, 2020. "The Moderating Role of Extroversion and Neuroticism in the Relationship between Autonomy at Work, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Mimi Moulik & V. N. Giri, 2024. "Job Crafting for Workplace Happiness: A Study of Millennials Across Indian Service Sectors," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 12(2), pages 242-260, April.
    4. Ana Moreira & Tiago Encarnação & João Viseu & Maria José Sousa, 2022. "Job Crafting and Job Performance: The Mediating Effect of Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Annamaria Di Fabio & Mirko Duradoni, 2020. "Humor Styles as New Resources in a Primary Preventive Perspective: Reducing Resistance to Change for Negotiation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Esther Lopez-Martin & Gabriela Topa, 2019. "Organizational Culture and Job Demands and Resources: Their Impact on Employees’ Wellbeing in a Multivariate Multilevel Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14378-:d:961829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.