IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p2172-d504218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Decision Makers and Service Providers Experience Participatory Approaches to Developing and Implementing Physical Activity Interventions with Older Adults? A Thematic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Amy Davies

    (Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
    Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • David P. French

    (Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
    Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
    National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration-Greater Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Angela Devereux-Fitzgerald

    (Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
    Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Elisabeth Boulton

    (Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
    Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Chris Todd

    (Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
    National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration-Greater Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
    Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Chris Phillipson

    (School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Laura J. McGowan

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

  • Rachael Powell

    (Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
    Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

Abstract

Background: Physical activity has numerous health and well-being benefits for older adults, but many older adults are inactive. Interventions designed to increase physical activity in older adults have typically only produced small effects and have not achieved long-term changes. There is increasing interest in participatory approaches to promoting physical activity, such as co-production, co-design and place-based approaches, but they have typically involved researchers as participants. This study aimed to understand the experiences of decision-makers and service developers with the introduction of such participatory approaches when developing new physical activity programmes outside of a research setting. Methods: Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 individuals who were involved in commissioning or developing the Greater Manchester Active Ageing Programme. This programme involved funding eight local authorities within Greater Manchester, England, to produce physical activity projects for older adults, involving participatory approaches. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted, structured using the Framework approach. Results: Interviewees identified important benefits of the participatory approaches. The increased involvement of older adults led to older adults contributing valuable ideas, becoming involved in and taking ownership of projects. Interviewees identified the need to move away from traditional emphases on increasing physical activity to improve health, towards focussing on social and fun elements. The accessibility of the session location and information was considered important. Challenges were also identified. In particular, it was recognised that the new approaches require significant time investment to do well, as trusting relationships with older adults and partner organisations need to be developed. Ensuring the sustainability of projects in the context of short-term funding cycles was a concern. Conclusions: Incorporating participatory approaches was perceived to yield important benefits. Interviewees highlighted that to ensure success, sufficient time needs to be provided to develop good working relationships with older adults and partner organisations. They also emphasised that sufficient funding to ensure adequate staffing and the sustainability of projects is required to allow benefits to be gained. Importantly, the implementation of these approaches appears feasible across a range of local authorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy Davies & David P. French & Angela Devereux-Fitzgerald & Elisabeth Boulton & Chris Todd & Chris Phillipson & Laura J. McGowan & Rachael Powell, 2021. "How Do Decision Makers and Service Providers Experience Participatory Approaches to Developing and Implementing Physical Activity Interventions with Older Adults? A Thematic Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:2172-:d:504218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/2172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/2172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Devereux-Fitzgerald, Angela & Powell, Rachael & Dewhurst, Anne & French, David P., 2016. "The acceptability of physical activity interventions to older adults: A systematic review and meta-synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 14-23.
    2. Brian N. Williams & Seong-Cheol Kang & Japera Johnson, 2016. "(Co)-Contamination as the Dark Side of Co-Production: Public value failures in co-production processes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 692-717, May.
    3. Murray, Jennifer M. & Brennan, Sarah F. & French, David P. & Patterson, Christopher C. & Kee, Frank & Hunter, Ruth F., 2017. "Effectiveness of physical activity interventions in achieving behaviour change maintenance in young and middle aged adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 125-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoffman, Geoffrey J. & Hays, Ron D. & Wallace, Steven P. & Shapiro, Martin F. & Ettner, Susan L., 2017. "Depressive symptomatology and fall risk among community-dwelling older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 206-213.
    2. Regina Kuppen & Mirjam de Leede & Jolanda Lindenberg & David van Bodegom, 2023. "Collective Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases in an Ageing Population with Community Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Angela Devereux-Fitzgerald & Rachael Powell & David P. French, 2021. "The Acceptability of Physical Activity to Older Adults Living in Lower Socioeconomic Status Areas: A Multi-Perspective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Vanessa G. Macintyre & Sarah Cotterill & Jamie Anderson & Chris Phillipson & Jack S. Benton & David P. French, 2019. "“I Would Never Come Here Because I’ve Got My Own Garden”: Older Adults’ Perceptions of Small Urban Green Spaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Ting Zhao & Junao Yuan & Zhongsheng Wu & Dongsheng Xu, 2024. "Resolving the unintended consequences of collective co-production through group co-production: a case study in Shanghai," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Ka-Man Leung & Kai-Ling Ou & Pak-Kwong Chung & Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani, 2021. "Older Adults’ Perceptions toward Walking: A Qualitative Study Using a Social-Ecological Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Kroencke, Lara & Harari, Gabriella M. & Katana, Marko & Gosling, Samuel D., 2019. "Personality trait predictors and mental well-being correlates of exercise frequency across the academic semester," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Diarmaid Ó Ceallaigh & Kirsten I.M. Rohde & Hans van Kippersluis, 2024. "Skipping your workout, again? Measuring and understanding time inconsistency in physical activity," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-028/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    9. Wan Nie & Antonieta Medina-Lara & Hywel Williams & Richard Smith, 2021. "Do Health, Environmental and Ethical Concerns Affect Purchasing Behavior? A Meta-Analysis and Narrative Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Reisgies, Helena & Shukri, Arim & Scheckel, Benjamin & Karasch, Olaf & Wiesen, Daniel & Stock, Stephanie & Müller, Dirk, 2023. "Effectiveness of behavioural economics-informed interventions to promote physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    11. Javier Zaragoza Casterad & Javier Sevil-Serrano & Julien E. Bois & Eduardo Generelo & Léna Lhuisset & Alberto Aibar-Solana, 2019. "Centre for the Promotion of Physical Activity and Health (CAPAS-City): A Pyrenean Cross-Cultural Structure to Lead the Way in the Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Multilevel Physical Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Beatriz Vallina Acha & Estrella Durá Ferrandis & Mireia Ferri Sanz & Maite Ferrando García, 2021. "Engaging People and Co-Producing Research with Persons and Communities to Foster Person-Centred Care: A Meta-Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Xenia Fischer & Jan-Niklas Kreppke & Lukas Zahner & Markus Gerber & Oliver Faude & Lars Donath, 2019. "Telephone-Based Coaching and Prompting for Physical Activity: Short- and Long-Term Findings of a Randomized Controlled Trial (Movingcall)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Tina Jukić & Primož Pevcin & Jože Benčina & Mitja Dečman & Sanja Vrbek, 2019. "Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-Production and Co-Creation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, November.
    16. Laura Pagani & Demetrio Panarello, 2022. "Evaluation of a program for promoting physical activity and well-being: Friuli Venezia Giulia in Movimento," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 80(1), pages 97-120, April.
    17. Thomas Parkington & Thomas Maden-Wilkinson & Markos Klonizakis & David Broom, 2022. "Comparative Perceptual, Affective, and Cardiovascular Responses between Resistance Exercise with and without Blood Flow Restriction in Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, November.
    18. Paolo Esposito & Paolo Ricci & Alessandro Sancino, 2021. "Leading for social change: Waste management in the place of social (ir)responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 667-674, March.
    19. Sandra Silva-Santos & António M. Monteiro & Tiago M. Barbosa & José E. Teixeira & Luís Branquinho & Ricardo Ferraz & Pedro Forte, 2023. "Associations between Coronavirus and Immune Response, Cardiorespiratory Fitness Rehabilitation and Physical Activity: A Brief Report," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-11, March.
    20. Kerry West & Kate Purcell & Abby Haynes & Jennifer Taylor & Leanne Hassett & Catherine Sherrington, 2021. "“People Associate Us with Movement so It’s an Awesome Opportunity”: Perspectives from Physiotherapists on Promoting Physical Activity, Exercise and Sport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:2172-:d:504218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.