IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13074-d700077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Properties of the Berger HIV Stigma Scale: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Stanley W. Wanjala

    (Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Campus UZ-Ghent, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Department of Social Sciences, Pwani University, Kilifi P.O. Box 195-80108, Kenya)

  • Ezra K. Too

    (Institute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Nairobi P.O. Box 30270-00100, Kenya)

  • Stanley Luchters

    (Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Campus UZ-Ghent, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Institute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Nairobi P.O. Box 30270-00100, Kenya
    Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Amina Abubakar

    (Institute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Nairobi P.O. Box 30270-00100, Kenya
    Department of Public Health, Pwani University, Kilifi P.O. Box 195-80108, Kenya
    Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
    Neuroassessment Group, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kilifi P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya)

Abstract

Addressing HIV-related stigma requires the use of psychometrically sound measures. However, despite the Berger HIV stigma scale (HSS) being among the most widely used measures for assessing HIV-related stigma, no study has systematically summarised its psychometric properties. This review investigated the psychometric properties of the HSS. A systematic review of articles published between 2001 and August 2021 was undertaken (CRD42020220305) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Additionally, we searched the grey literature and screened the reference lists of the included studies. Of the total 1241 studies that were screened, 166 were included in the review, of which 24 were development and/or validation studies. The rest were observational or experimental studies. All the studies except two reported some aspect of the scale’s reliability. The reported internal consistency ranged from acceptable to excellent (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.70) in 93.2% of the studies. Only eight studies reported test–retest reliability, and the reported reliability was adequate, except for one study. Only 36 studies assessed and established the HSS’s validity. The HSS appears to be a reliable and valid measure of HIV-related stigma. However, the validity evidence came from only 36 studies, most of which were conducted in North America and Europe. Consequently, more validation work is necessary for more precise insights.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanley W. Wanjala & Ezra K. Too & Stanley Luchters & Amina Abubakar, 2021. "Psychometric Properties of the Berger HIV Stigma Scale: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13074-:d:700077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13074/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13074/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria H Lindberg & Lena Wettergren & Maria Wiklander & Veronica Svedhem-Johansson & Lars E Eriksson, 2014. "Psychometric Evaluation of the HIV Stigma Scale in a Swedish Context," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. James Ayieko & Lillian Brown & Sibyl Anthierens & Annelies Van Rie & Monica Getahun & Edwin D Charlebois & Maya L Petersen & Tamara D Clark & Moses R Kamya & Craig R Cohen & Elizabeth A Bukusi & Diane, 2018. "“Hurdles on the path to 90-90-90 and beyond”: Qualitative analysis of barriers to engagement in HIV care among individuals in rural East Africa in the context of test-and-treat," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Adriana ZAIT & Patricea Elena BERTEA, 2011. "Methods For Testing Discriminant Validity," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 217-224, November.
    4. Nella Otoobea Anakwa & Enoch Teye-Kwadjo & Irene A. Kretchy, 2021. "Effect of HIV-Related Stigma and HIV-Related Stress on HIV Disclosure Concerns: a Study of HIV-Positive Persons on Antiretroviral Therapy at Two Urban Hospitals in Ghana," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 1249-1264, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen Zhang & Xiaoming Li & Yu Liu & Shan Qiao & Liying Zhang & Yuejiao Zhou & Zhenzhu Tang & Zhiyong Shen & Yi Chen, 2016. "Stigma against People Living with HIV/AIDS in China: Does the Route of Infection Matter?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Yi-Ching Hsieh & Hung-Chang Chiu & Yun-Chia Tang & Wei-Yun Lin, 2018. "Does Raising Value Co-creation Increase All Customers’ Happiness?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1053-1067, November.
    3. Hsu, Dan K. & Burmeister-Lamp, Katrin & Simmons, Sharon A. & Foo, Maw-Der & Hong, Michelle C. & Pipes, Jesse D., 2019. "“I know I can, but I don't fit”: Perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 311-326.
    4. Agustín J. Sánchez-Medina & Ylenia I. Naranjo-Barrera & Jesús B. Alonso & Julio Francisco Rufo Torres, 2018. "Predicting Thalasso Tourist Delight: A Hybrid SEM—Artificial Intelligence Analysis," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-14, October.
    5. Anupam Singh & Priyanka Verma, 2018. "Driving Brand Value Through CSR Initiatives: An Empirical Study in Indian Perspective," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(1), pages 85-98, February.
    6. Tayyba Mirza & Dr. Basharat Raza, 2023. "Does Polychronicity Impact Innovative Work Behavior? The Role of Procrastination," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(4), pages 602-609.
    7. Sanja Kovačić & Marija Cimbaljević & Tatyana N. Tretyakova & Yulia A. Syromiatnikova & Blanca García Henche & Marko D. Petrović & Ivana Blešić & Tatjana Pivac & Dunja Demirović Bajrami & Tamara Gajić, 2023. "How Has COVID-19 Changed the Way We Travel? Exploring Tourist Personality, Reactions to the Perceived Risk and Change in Travel Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Salari, Nasir, 2022. "Electric vehicles adoption behaviour: Synthesising the technology readiness index with environmentalism values and instrumental attributes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 60-81.
    9. Bougoure, Ursula Sigrid & Russell-Bennett, Rebekah & Fazal-E-Hasan, Syed & Mortimer, Gary, 2016. "The impact of service failure on brand credibility," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 62-71.
    10. Brian Garrod & David Dowell, 2020. "Experiential Marketing of an Underground Tourist Attraction," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Hailiang Wang & Jiaxin Zhang & Yan Luximon & Mingfu Qin & Ping Geng & Da Tao, 2022. "The Determinants of User Acceptance of Mobile Medical Platforms: An Investigation Integrating the TPB, TAM, and Patient-Centered Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Ziyao Zhou & Qijin Cheng, 2022. "Measuring Online Social Support: Development and Validation of a Short Form for Chinese Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, October.
    13. João Romão & Bart Neuts & Peter Nijkamp & Eveline van Leeuwen, 2015. "Culture, Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation: A Structural Analysis of the Motivation and Satisfaction of Tourists in Amsterdam," Tourism Economics, , vol. 21(3), pages 455-474, June.
    14. Agustín J. Sánchez-Medina & Juan Manuel Benítez-del-Rosario & Félix Blázquez-Santana, 2017. "Anomia and Displacement of Responsibility as Determinants of Tourist Company Managers’ Non-Involvement in Alleviating Poverty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Gillani, Fatima & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Implementation of digital manufacturing technologies: Antecedents and consequences," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    16. Wang, Jinggai & Zhong, Meisu & Wang, Tianni & Ge, Ying-En, 2023. "Identifying industry-related opinions on shore power from a survey in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 65-81.
    17. Akram Hasan Aljaffan, 2017. "A Review of the Tripartite Model Linking Associations between TQM, Organizational Learning, and Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(8), pages 11-30, August.
    18. Jurgita Raudeliuniene & Ibrahim Matar, 2022. "Knowledge Management Practice for Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions: Women Managers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    19. SiJian Niu & Byung Il Park & Jin Sup Jung, 2022. "The Effects of Digital Leadership and ESG Management on Organizational Innovation and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Sanja Kovačić & Tatjana Pivac & Müge Akkar Ercan & Kinga Kimic & Petja Ivanova-Radovanova & Klodiana Gorica & Ermelinda Kordha Tolica, 2023. "Exploring the Image, Perceived Authenticity, and Perceived Value of Underground Built Heritage (UBH) and Its Role in Motivation to Visit: A Case Study of Five Different Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13074-:d:700077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.