IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12358-d686862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Predictive Factors of New Technology Adoption, Workers’ Well-Being and Absenteeism: The Case of a Public Maritime Company in Venice

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Panari

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy)

  • Giorgio Lorenzi

    (AVM Holding Venice, 30135 Venice, Italy)

  • Marco Giovanni Mariani

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

The main goal of this research was to investigate the psychosocial aspects that influence the acceptance of innovative technology in maritime transport and its impact on employees’ work-related wellbeing and absenteeism. In particular, this study focused on a device that had been introduced to sailors working in water public transportation in Venice. The theoretical framework included two integrated models: the TAM model, concerning acceptance of the technology, and the JD-R model, related to workers’ well-being. A two-wave study was conducted; at T1, a self-report questionnaire was administered to 122 sailors. Four months after its first administration (T2), objective data related to days of absenteeism were collected. The study showed that the perceived ease of use and the usefulness of the device influenced the workers’ intentions to use the technology and their motivational processes of work engagement, which was also related to social support. Work engagement impacted on work satisfaction and predicted the level of absenteeism (measured at Time 2). The implementation of a new technology may fail if transportation companies do not consider psychosocial factors that assist in the acceptance of such technology and promote the involvement of workers in the technological system.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Panari & Giorgio Lorenzi & Marco Giovanni Mariani, 2021. "The Predictive Factors of New Technology Adoption, Workers’ Well-Being and Absenteeism: The Case of a Public Maritime Company in Venice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12358-:d:686862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12358/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12358/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    2. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Anand Jeyaraj & Marc Clement & Michael D. Williams, 2019. "Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 719-734, June.
    3. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    4. Martínez-Córcoles, Mario & Teichmann, Mare & Murdvee, Mart, 2017. "Assessing technophobia and technophilia: Development and validation of a questionnaire," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 183-188.
    5. Henrich R. Greve, 2009. "Bigger and safer: the diffusion of competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Väänänen, Ari & Toppinen-Tanner, Salla & Kalimo, Raija & Mutanen, Pertti & Vahtera, Jussi & Peiró, José M., 2003. "Job characteristics, physical and psychological symptoms, and social support as antecedents of sickness absence among men and women in the private industrial sector," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 807-824, September.
    7. Javad Shahreki & Jaya Ganesan & Kavitha Raman & Audrey Lim Li Chin & Tee Suan Chin, 2019. "The effect of human resource information system application on employee satisfaction and turnover intention," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1462-1479, December.
    8. Monica Molino & Claudio G. Cortese & Chiara Ghislieri, 2020. "The Promotion of Technology Acceptance and Work Engagement in Industry 4.0: From Personal Resources to Information and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Premkumar, G. & Bhattacherjee, Anol, 2008. "Explaining information technology usage: A test of competing models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 64-75, February.
    10. Birgit Pauksztat, 2017. "Effects of job demands and social interactions on fatigue in short sea cargo shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 623-640, July.
    11. Prem Borle & Kathrin Reichel & Fiona Niebuhr & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2021. "How Are Techno-Stressors Associated with Mental Health and Work Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Information and Communication Technologies within the Technostress Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Giuliano Almeida Marodin & Tarcisio Abreu Saurin, 2015. "Managing barriers to lean production implementation: context matters," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(13), pages 3947-3962, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Byung-Jik Kim & Julak Lee, 2024. "The mental health implications of artificial intelligence adoption: the crucial role of self-efficacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Chiara Consiglio & Nicoletta Massa & Valentina Sommovigo & Luigi Fusco, 2023. "Techno-Stress Creators, Burnout and Psychological Health among Remote Workers during the Pandemic: The Moderating Role of E-Work Self-Efficacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Kapser, Sebastian & Abdelrahman, Mahmoud & Bernecker, Tobias, 2021. "Autonomous delivery vehicles to fight the spread of Covid-19 – How do men and women differ in their acceptance?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 183-198.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7962 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Hailiang Wang & Jiaxin Zhang & Yan Luximon & Mingfu Qin & Ping Geng & Da Tao, 2022. "The Determinants of User Acceptance of Mobile Medical Platforms: An Investigation Integrating the TPB, TAM, and Patient-Centered Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Tianyi Li & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2024. "Development Trajectory of Blockchain Platforms: The Role of Multirole," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1296-1323, September.
    7. Monica Molino & Claudio G. Cortese & Chiara Ghislieri, 2021. "Technology Acceptance and Leadership 4.0: A Quali-Quantitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Sang Soo Kim, 2020. "Purchase Intention in the Online Open Market: Do Concerns for E-Commerce Really Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Elizabeth Marsh & Elvira Perez Vallejos & Alexa Spence, 2024. "Overloaded by Information or Worried About Missing Out on It: A Quantitative Study of Stress, Burnout, and Mental Health Implications in the Digital Workplace," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    10. Issa Helmi & Lakkis Hussein & Dakroub Roy & Jaber Jad, 2023. "Examining User Engagement and Experience in Agritech," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 59(2), pages 17-32, June.
    11. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis & Ghosh, Soumya Kanti, 2021. "Adoption of artificial intelligence-integrated CRM systems in agile organizations in India," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Elisabeth Rohwer & Joelle-Cathrin Flöther & Volker Harth & Stefanie Mache, 2022. "Overcoming the “Dark Side” of Technology—A Scoping Review on Preventing and Coping with Work-Related Technostress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.
    13. G. M. Azmal Ali Quaosar & Md. Abidur Rahman & Md. Siddikur Rahman, 2024. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of HRIS: An Empirical Study Using Extended UTAUT2 Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(3), pages 213-213, June.
    14. Higueras-Castillo, Elena & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco J. & Villarejo-Ramos, Ángel F., 2023. "Intention to use e-commerce vs physical shopping. Difference between consumers in the post-COVID era," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Bommer, William H. & Milevoj, Emil & Rana, Shailesh, 2023. "The intention to use cryptocurrency: A meta-analysis of what we know," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    16. Óscar. R. González-López & María Buenadicha-Mateos & M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández, 2021. "Overwhelmed by Technostress? Sensitive Archetypes and Effects in Times of Forced Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Taqwa Hariguna & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Bakri Bin Madon & Khaled Mofawiz Alfawaz, 2023. "Assessing Determinants of Continuance Intention Toward Cryptocurrency Usage: Extending Expectation Confirmation Model With Technology Readiness," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    18. Giorgia Bondanini & Gabriele Giorgi & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Paola Andreucci-Annunziata, 2020. "Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Alexander Mayr & Philip Stahmann & Maximilian Nebel & Christian Janiesch, 2024. "Still doing it yourself? Investigating determinants for the adoption of intelligent process automation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Federico Iannacci & Colm Fearon & Kristine Pole, 2021. "From Acceptance to Adaptive Acceptance of Social Media Policy Change: a Set-Theoretic Analysis of B2B SMEs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 663-680, June.
    21. Mehmet Akif Çini & Meral Erdirençelebi & Abdullah Zübeyr Akman, 2023. "The Effect of Organization Employees' Perspective on Digital Transformation on Their Technostress Levels and Performance: A Public Institution Example," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(4), pages 33-57.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12358-:d:686862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.