IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i1d10.1007_s13132-023-01178-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Does It Take for Organizations to Adopt Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)? A Fuzzy DANP Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Reyhaneh Bijaniaram

    (Kharazmi University)

  • Maryam Tehrani

    (Kharazmi University)

  • Roohallah Noori

    (Kharazmi University)

  • Jongwook Pak

    (The University of Auckland Business School)

Abstract

The growing utilization of advanced technologies such as massive open online courses (MOOCs) within organizations represents change, and embracing such change begins with individual and organizational end-users who often resist newly introduced systems. Recent studies have primarily focused on identifying critical factors in educational and corporate MOOCs adoption, while the consolidation of these factors has been overlooked. With our fuzzy DEMATEL-based analytical network process (DANP) analysis, this research fills this critical gap by prioritizing the identified factors and specifying their causality to understand how these critical factors can influence the successful implementation of MOOCs training systems in the workplace. Through consensus from a panel of human resource development (HRD) experts, 20 success factors at individual, content, and organizational levels were screened. Results indicate that the individual factors are the most influential, while the content factors are influenced most by other factors under study. Results also indicate that organizational sub-factors of technical support ranked first, training on how to work with MOOCs system second, and the presence of content experts ranked third. Therefore, our study unravels the significance of ranking multi-level determinants for educators and managers who plan to embark on MOOCs to attain a competitive advantage for both the globalized economy and societal trends. We propose a paradigm for future research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Reyhaneh Bijaniaram & Maryam Tehrani & Roohallah Noori & Jongwook Pak, 2024. "What Does It Take for Organizations to Adopt Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)? A Fuzzy DANP Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1499-1534, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01178-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01178-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-023-01178-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-023-01178-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dengke Yu & Rong Zhou, 2017. "Intellectual Management: An Integrative Theory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(3), pages 929-956, September.
    2. Amir Karbassi Yazdi & Masoud Haddadi, 2018. "Prioritising critical successful factors of knowledge management in insurance companies," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(3), pages 281-299.
    3. Mohsen Attaran & Sharmin Attaran & Diane Kirkland, 2019. "The Need for Digital Workplace: Increasing Workforce Productivity in the Information Age," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Aleksandra Skorupinska & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2017. "ICT, Innovation and Productivity: Evidence Based on Eastern European Manufacturing Companies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 768-788, June.
    5. Lucienne Abrahams, 2011. "South Africa’s e-Development Still a Futuristic Task," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(1), pages 145-171, March.
    6. Roopesh Kevin Sungkur & Olivier Sebastien & Upasana Gitanjali Singh, 2020. "Social Media as a Catalyst for Distant Collaborative Learning: Trends and Concerns for Small Island States," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(4), pages 1454-1469, December.
    7. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    8. Wilfried Admiraal & Bart Huisman & Maarten Van de Ven, 2014. "Self- and Peer Assessment in Massive Open Online Courses," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(3), pages 119-119, August.
    9. Marjorie Lecerf & Nessrine Omrani, 2020. "SME Internationalization: the Impact of Information Technology and Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(2), pages 805-824, June.
    10. Nagy Hanna, 2011. "E-Sri Lanka as a Deliberate and Emergent Strategy Process," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(1), pages 3-37, March.
    11. Monica Molino & Claudio G. Cortese & Chiara Ghislieri, 2020. "The Promotion of Technology Acceptance and Work Engagement in Industry 4.0: From Personal Resources to Information and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    13. Roopesh Kevin Sungkur & Mohammad Issack Santally, 2019. "Knowledge Sharing for Capacity Building in Open and Distance Learning (ODL): Reflections from the African Experience," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 380-396, March.
    14. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth L. Kraemer, 2005. "Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 61-84, March.
    15. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    16. Huang, Liqiang & Zhang, Jie & Liu, Yuan, 2017. "Antecedents of student MOOC revisit intention: Moderation effect of course difficulty," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 84-91.
    17. Fletcher, Gordon & Griffiths, Marie, 2020. "Digital transformation during a lockdown," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    18. Kleijnen, Mirella & Lee, Nick & Wetzels, Martin, 2009. "An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 344-357, June.
    19. Elizabeth Marsh, 2018. "Understanding the Effect of Digital Literacy on Employees' Digital Workplace Continuance Intentions and Individual Performance," International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLDC), IGI Global, vol. 9(2), pages 15-33, April.
    20. Nagy K. Hanna, 2011. "E-Sri Lanka as a Deliberate and Emergent Strategy Process," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Nagy K. Hanna & Peter T. Knight (ed.), Seeking Transformation Through Information Technology, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 189-227, Springer.
    21. Bing Wu & Chenyan Zhang, 2014. "Empirical study on continuance intentions towards E-Learning 2.0 systems," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(10), pages 1027-1038, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nan Zhang & Xunhua Guo & Guoqing Chen, 2011. "Why adoption and use behavior of IT/IS cannot last?—two studies in China," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 381-395, July.
    2. Albayati, Hayder & Kim, Suk Kyoung & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2020. "Accepting financial transactions using blockchain technology and cryptocurrency: A customer perspective approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Nastjuk, Ilja & Herrenkind, Bernd & Marrone, Mauricio & Brendel, Alfred Benedikt & Kolbe, Lutz M., 2020. "What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user's perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    5. repec:zna:indecs:v:19:y:2021:i:4:p:420-436 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Nistor, Cristian, 2013. "A conceptual model for the use of social media in companies," MPRA Paper 44224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Kawsar Ahmad & Arifuzzaman Arifuzzaman & Abdullah Al Mamun & Junayed Md Khaled Bin Oalid, 2021. "Impact of consumer’s security, benefits and usefulness towards cashless transaction within Malaysian university student," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 238-250, March.
    8. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    9. Al-Qeisi, Kholoud & Dennis, Charles & Alamanos, Eleftherios & Jayawardhena, Chanaka, 2014. "Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2282-2290.
    10. Oghuma, Apollos Patricks & Chang, Younghoon & Libaque-Saenz, Christian Fernando & Park, Myeong-Cheol & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2015. "Benefit-confirmation model for post-adoption behavior of mobile instant messaging applications: A comparative analysis of KakaoTalk and Joyn in Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 658-677.
    11. Shafiqul Islam & Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Noor-E- Zannat, 2023. "Behavioral Intention to Use Online for Shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    12. Netsanet Haile & Jörn Altmann, 2016. "Structural analysis of value creation in software service platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(2), pages 129-142, May.
    13. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi & Al-Nabhani, Khalid & Marriott, Hannah, 2020. "Examining consumer attitudes towards retailers' m-commerce mobile applications – An initial adoption vs. continuous use perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 139-157.
    14. Garaus, Marion & Wolfsteiner, Elisabeth & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Shoppers' acceptance and perceptions of electronic shelf labels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3687-3692.
    15. Ivonne Angelica Castiblanco Jimenez & Laura Cristina Cepeda García & Maria Grazia Violante & Federica Marcolin & Enrico Vezzetti, 2020. "Commonly Used External TAM Variables in e-Learning, Agriculture and Virtual Reality Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Juan F. Tavera Mesías & Juan C. Sánchez Giraldo & Bernardo Ballesteros Díaz, 2011. "Aceptación del E-Commerce en Colombia: un estudio para la ciudad de Medellín," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, December.
    17. Zhiqiang Yuan & Jing Liu & Xi Deng & Tianzi Ding & Tommy Tanu Wijaya, 2023. "Facilitating Conditions as the Biggest Factor Influencing Elementary School Teachers’ Usage Behavior of Dynamic Mathematics Software in China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Salvador Angosto & Jerónimo García-Fernández & Moisés Grimaldi-Puyana, 2023. "A systematic review of intention to use fitness apps (2020–2023)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Yadgar Taha M. Hamakhan, 2020. "The effect of individual factors on user behaviour and the moderating role of trust: an empirical investigation of consumers’ acceptance of electronic banking in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    20. Junic Kim, 2018. "Platform Adoption Factors in the Internet Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    21. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Marinkovic, Veljko & Ramos de Luna, Iviane & Kalinic, Zoran, 2018. "Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 117-130.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01178-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.