IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10732-d655200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploration of the Socioecological Determinants of Hong Kong Workers’ Work-Life Balance: A Grounded Theory Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ka Po Wong

    (Department of Advanced Design and Systems Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Alan Hoi Shou Chan

    (Department of Advanced Design and Systems Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Background: Although a growing body of research has investigated the theoretical and empirical models of work-life balance (WLB), the propositions of this phenomenon remain nonunified. Thus, a grounded theory approach was adopted to explore the viewpoints of workers regarding WLB and its determinants and consequences. Methods: Individual face-to-face interviews were conducted to investigate the attitudes and experiences of Hong Kong workers towards WLB, in which 50 workers were interviewed. All data of interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded into five levels of the socioecological framework (i.e., intrapersonal level, interpersonal level, organisational level, community and government policy). Results: The grounded theory model established that work-life balance and personal context mutually affected each other, and work-life balance was unidirectionally affected by the environmental context. The ability to maintain a continual satisfied physical and mental states among multiple roles under the emergence of unexpected environmental factors was proposed as the definition of work-life balance. Conclusions: The findings of this study offer essential research insights into the importance of WLB, the dynamic features for workers to sustain balance and constructing a reliable and exhaustive assessment model for work-life balance for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ka Po Wong & Alan Hoi Shou Chan, 2021. "Exploration of the Socioecological Determinants of Hong Kong Workers’ Work-Life Balance: A Grounded Theory Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10732-:d:655200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10732/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10732/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. So Young Kim & Min-Su Kim & Bumjung Park & Jin-Hwan Kim & Hyo Geun Choi, 2018. "Lack of sleep is associated with internet use for leisure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Cindy Xinshan Jia & Chau-kiu Cheung & Chengzhe Fu, 2020. "Work Support, Role Stress, and Life Satisfaction among Chinese Social Workers: The Mediation Role of Work-Family Conflict," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Adam Hege & Michael K. Lemke & Yorghos Apostolopoulos & Brian Whitaker & Sevil Sönmez, 2019. "Work-Life Conflict among U.S. Long-Haul Truck Drivers: Influences of Work Organization, Perceived Job Stress, Sleep, and Organizational Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Parkes, Louise P & Langford, Peter H, 2008. "Work–life bal ance or work–life alignment? A test of the importance of work-life balance for employee engagement and intention to stay in organisations," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 267-284, July.
    5. Jarrod M. Haar & Albert Sune & Marcello Russo & Ariane Ollier-Malaterre, 2019. "A Cross-National Study on the Antecedents of Work–Life Balance from the Fit and Balance Perspective," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 261-282, February.
    6. Ji Sung Kim & Sangyub Ryu, 2017. "Employee Satisfaction With Work‐life Balance Policies And Organizational Commitment: A Philippine Study," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(4), pages 260-276, October.
    7. Neena Gopalan & Murugan Pattusamy, 2020. "Role of Work and Family Factors in Predicting Career Satisfaction and Life Success," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Yadong Luo & Ying Huang & Stephanie Lu Wang, 2012. "Guanxi and Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analysis," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 8(1), pages 139-172, March.
    9. Mingjie Zhou & Jinfeng Zhang & Fugui Li & Chen Chen, 2020. "Work-Family Conflict and Depressive Symptoms Among Chinese Employees: Cross-Level Interaction of Organizational Justice Climate and Family Flexibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Ágnes Utasi, 2003. "Independet, never married people in their thirties: Remaining single," Demográfia English Edition, Hungarian Demographic Research Institute, vol. 48(5), pages 122-143.
    11. Luo, Yadong & Huang, Ying & Wang, Stephanie Lu, 2012. "Guanxi and Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analysis," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 139-172, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Liane W.Y. & Tang, Yiming & Yip, Leslie S.C. & Sharma, Piyush, 2018. "Managing customer relationships in the emerging markets – guanxi as a driver of Chinese customer loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 356-365.
    2. Chu, Zhaofang & Feng, Bo & Lai, Fujun, 2018. "Logistics service innovation by third party logistics providers in China: Aligning guanxi and organizational structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 291-307.
    3. Yang, Jie & Ma, Jieqiong & Zhang, Yong & Hong, JungHwa, 2018. "With whom should you have dinner? A multidimensional framework for understanding political ties in China," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 891-898.
    4. Zhong Qin & Xin Deng, 2016. "Government and family Guanxi in Chinese private firms: perceptions and preference," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 35-60, January.
    5. Lu, Tingyu & Zhuang, Mengzhou & Zhuang, Guijun, 2021. "When does guanxi hurt interfirm cooperation? The moderating effects of institutional development and IT infrastructure capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 177-186.
    6. Hongjuan Zhang & Liang Wang & Rong Han, 2019. "The China-West divide on social capital: A meta-analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 745-772, September.
    7. Xueling Li & Jia Shen & Wenjie Ma & Weiyong Zhang, 2016. "The effect of business ties and government ties on new IT venture growth: an empirical examination in China," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 245-261, September.
    8. Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro & Rui, Huaichuan, 2017. "Barriers to absorptive capacity in emerging market firms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 727-742.
    9. Yulia Muratova & Jakob Arnoldi & Xin Chen & Joachim Scholderer, 2018. "Political rotations and cross-province firm acquisitions in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(1), pages 37-58, February.
    10. Dirk Holtbrügge, 2013. "Indigenous Management Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 1-11, February.
    11. Luo, Jun & Chong, Alain Yee-Loong & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Liu, Martin J., 2014. "Green Supply Chain Collaboration implementation in China: The mediating role of guanxi," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 98-110.
    12. Wenting Chen & Chunjia Han & Lei Wang & Petros Ieromonachou & Xiaochen Lu, 2021. "Recognition of entrepreneur’s social ties and firm innovation in emerging markets: explanation from the industrial institutional environment and survival pressure," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 491-518, June.
    13. Kaixian Mao & Yaping Gong, 2024. "The contingent effect of private entrepreneur foreign-study experience on firm innovation in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 2021-2057, December.
    14. Chen, Meng & Tang, Xinlin & Liu, Hefu & Gu, Jibao, 2023. "The impact of supply chain concentration on integration and business performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    15. Yen, Dorothy Ai-wan & Abosag, Ibrahim, 2016. "Localization in China: How guanxi moderates Sino–US business relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5724-5734.
    16. Daniel Shapiro & Yao Tang & Miaojun Wang & Weiying Zhang, 2017. "Monetary incentives and innovation in Chinese SMEs," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(3), pages 130-157, July.
    17. Young Kyun Chang & Won-Yong Oh & Jee Hyun Park & Myoung Gyun Jang, 2017. "Exploring the Relationship Between Board Characteristics and CSR: Empirical Evidence from Korea," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 225-242, January.
    18. Huihua Chen & Cong Chen & Hujun Li & Jianshe Zhang & Zengke Yang, 2022. "A Simulation Study on the Processes of Intra-Group Informal Interaction Affecting Workers’ Safety Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Dejin Su & Qixia Du & Dongwon Sohn & Libo Xu, 2017. "Can High-Tech Ventures Benefit from Government Guanxi and Business Guanxi ? The Moderating Effects of Environmental Turbulence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra & Ajai Gaur & Deeksha Singh, 2019. "Pro-market institutions and global strategy: The pendulum of pro-market reforms and reversals," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(4), pages 598-632, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10732-:d:655200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.