IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1150-d319825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The High-Performance Work System, Employee Voice, and Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Role of Psychological Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Rentao Miao

    (School of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China)

  • Lu Lu

    (School of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China)

  • Yi Cao

    (School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Qing Du

    (School of Foreign Studies, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China)

Abstract

In this study, we examined the associations of the high-performance work system (HPWS) with employee innovative behavior, and tested a theoretical model in which these associations were mediated by employee voice (promotive and prohibitive voice) and moderated by psychological safety. Matched data were collected from 46 HR (Human Resource) managers and 374 full-time employees from 46 companies in China with multi-source and time-lagged techniques. We found that the HPWS is associated with employee behavior. Both the promotive voice and prohibitive voice partially mediate the relationship between HPWS and employee innovative behavior. Psychological safety moderates the relationship between HPWS and the promotive voice. However, psychological safety does not moderate the relationship between HPWS and the prohibitive voice. Furthermore, psychological safety moderates the mediation effect of the promotive voice between HPWS and employee innovative behavior. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Rentao Miao & Lu Lu & Yi Cao & Qing Du, 2020. "The High-Performance Work System, Employee Voice, and Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Role of Psychological Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1150-:d:319825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rentao Miao & Yi Cao, 2019. "High-Performance Work System, Work Well-Being, and Employee Creativity: Cross-Level Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Escribá-Carda, Naiara & Balbastre-Benavent, Francisco & Teresa Canet-Giner, M., 2017. "Employees' perceptions of high-performance work systems and innovative behaviour: The role of exploratory learning," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 273-281.
    3. Stan De Spiegelaere & Geert Van Hootegem & Guy Van Gyes, 2012. "Job Design and Innovative Work Behavior: One Size Does Not Fit All Types of Employees," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 8(4), pages 5-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cătălina Radu & Alecxandrina Deaconu & Iudith-Anci Kis & Adela Jansen & Sorina Ioana Mișu, 2023. "New Ways to Perform: Employees’ Perspective on Remote Work and Psychological Security in the Post-Pandemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Chung-Jen Wang & I-Hsiu Yang, 2021. "Why and How Does Empowering Leadership Promote Proactive Work Behavior? An Examination with a Serial Mediation Model among Hotel Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Sunwang Kim & Jimin Kwon & Dongil Jung, 2023. "Going beyond the firm perspective: what do employees think of high-performance work systems (HPWS)?," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 2106-2134, November.
    4. Chaojie Liu & Timothy Bartram & Sandra G. Leggat, 2020. "Link of Patient Care Outcome to Occupational Differences in Response to Human Resource Management: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study on Hospital Doctors and Nurses in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Zargham Ullah Khan & Muhammad Bilal Ahmad & Fatima Shaukat & Munawar Kashif, 2024. "Role of High-Performance Human Resource Practices and Employee Innovative Behavior in the Implementation of Digital Transformation: A Case of Pakistan’s IT Sector," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 521-526.
    6. Hitmi Khalifa Alhitmi & Syed Haider Ali Shah & Rabia Kishwer & Nida Aman & Mochammad Fahlevi & Mohammed Aljuaid & Petra Heidler, 2023. "Marketing from Leadership to Innovation: A Mediated Moderation Model Investigating How Transformational Leadership Impacts Employees’ Innovative Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Sidra Salam & Aslan Amat Senin, 2022. "A Bibliometric Study on Innovative Behavior Literature (1961–2019)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    3. Leonel Prieto & Md Farid Talukder, 2023. "Resilient Agility: A Necessary Condition for Employee and Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Antonia Madrid-Guijarro & Dominique Philippe Martin & Domingo García-Pérez-de-Lema, 2021. "Capacity of open innovation activities in fostering product and process innovation in manufacturing SMEs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2137-2164, October.
    5. Cai Li & Sheikh Farhan Ashraf & Saba Amin & Muhammad Nabeel Safdar, 2023. "Consequence of Resistance to Change on AI Readiness: Mediating–Moderating Role of Task-oriented Leadership and High-Performance Work System in the Hospitality Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    6. Wenjing Cai & Svetlana Khapova & Bart Bossink & Evgenia Lysova & Jing Yuan, 2020. "Optimizing Employee Creativity in the Digital Era: Uncovering the Interactional Effects of Abilities, Motivations, and Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Tayyaba Akram & Shen Lei & Muhammad Jamal Haider & Muhammad Waqar Akram, 2017. "What Impact Do Structural, Relational And Cognitive Organisational Social Capital Have On Employee Innovative Work Behaviour? A Study From China," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(02), pages 1-29, February.
    8. Alexandra Portalanza-Chavarría & Lorenzo Revuelto-Taboada, 2023. "Driving intrapreneurial behavior through high-performance work systems," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 897-921, June.
    9. Felix Kipkosgei, 2022. "Perceived Entrepreneurial Stress and Entrepreneurial Resilience; The Mediating Role of the Well-Being of Entrepreneurs and Moderating Role Perceived Online Social Support," Merits, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Juan A. Marin-Garcia & Tomas Bonavia, 2021. "Empowerment and Employee Well-Being: A Mediation Analysis Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Wang Ro Lee & Suk Bong Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2021. "How Leaders’ Positive Feedback Influences Employees’ Innovative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Voice Behavior and Job Autonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Tung-Ju Wu & Jia-Ying Gao & Lian-Yi Wang & Kuo-Shu Yuan, 2020. "Exploring Links between Polychronicity and Job Performance from the Person–Environment Fit Perspective—The Mediating Role of Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Ahmad, Naveed & Ullah, Zia & AlDhaen, Esra & Han, Heesup & Scholz, Miklas, 2022. "A CSR perspective to foster employee creativity in the banking sector: The role of work engagement and psychological safety," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Sunwang Kim & Jimin Kwon & Dongil Jung, 2023. "Going beyond the firm perspective: what do employees think of high-performance work systems (HPWS)?," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 2106-2134, November.
    15. Jia Xu & Baoguo Xie & Bin Tang, 2020. "Guanxi HRM Practice and Employees’ Occupational Well-Being in China: A Multi-Level Psychological Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Chung-Jen Wang & I-Hsiu Yang, 2021. "Why and How Does Empowering Leadership Promote Proactive Work Behavior? An Examination with a Serial Mediation Model among Hotel Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Ali Fadul, 2021. "Does Organizational Justice Influence Employee Innovative Behavior in an Arabic Context? Evidence From the Libyan Oil Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    18. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende, 2020. "Ambidextrous Relationships and Social Capability as Employee Well-Being: The Secret Sauce for Research and Development and Sustainable Innovation Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Hanan S. AlEssa & Christopher M. Durugbo, 2024. "Linking Innovative Work Behaviour to Career Satisfaction: Engagement, Flexibility, and Perspectives from Male and Female Service Employees," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(4), pages 895-916, December.
    20. Binghai Sun & Hongteng Guo & Luyun Xu & Fujun Ding, 2022. "How Does Teachers’ Psychological Capital Influence Workplace Well-Being? A Moderated Mediation Model of Ego-Resiliency and Work-Meaning Cognition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1150-:d:319825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.