IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p8106-d439369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adolescents’ Sexy Self-Presentation on Instagram: An Investigation of Their Posting Behavior Using a Prototype Willingness Model Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Joris Van Ouytsel

    (Department of Communication Studies, MIOS, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Michel Walrave

    (Department of Communication Studies, MIOS, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Mónica Ojeda

    (Department of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Rosario Del Rey

    (Department of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Koen Ponnet

    (Department of Communication Studies, IMEC-MICT, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

Some adolescents use social media platforms, such as Instagram, for sexualized self-presentation, which includes posting images in which someone is scarcely dressed, has a sexy gaze or in which sexual willingness is suggested. These behaviors could be a first step towards sexting. Given that adolescents are highly influenced by peer perceptions, this study uses the prototype willingness model to assess how teenagers’ perceptions of others could influence their posting behaviors. The study was conducted among 2626 students ( n = 1530; 58.4% girls) between the ages of 14 and 21 ( M = 16.14; SD = 1.02) in 10 secondary schools in the Dutch-speaking community in Belgium. The results show that older adolescents and girls were more likely to post images of themselves on Instagram. The models showed that peer norms and willingness and attitudes were significantly associated with posting intention. The perceived norms of adolescents’ parents were not significantly related to the behaviors. There were also significant associations between perceived similarity, prototype favorability and the willingness to engage in sexualized self-presentation on Instagram. The implications for education and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Joris Van Ouytsel & Michel Walrave & Mónica Ojeda & Rosario Del Rey & Koen Ponnet, 2020. "Adolescents’ Sexy Self-Presentation on Instagram: An Investigation of Their Posting Behavior Using a Prototype Willingness Model Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8106-:d:439369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosario Del Rey & Rosario Ortega-Ruiz & José Antonio Casas, 2019. "Asegúrate: An Intervention Program against Cyberbullying Based on Teachers’ Commitment and on Design of Its Instructional Materials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Wood, Marsha & Barter, Christine & Stanley, Nicky & Aghtaie, Nadia & Larkins, Cath, 2015. "Images across Europe: The sending and receiving of sexual images and associations with interpersonal violence in young people's relationships," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 149-160.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Sonia Livingstone & Anke Görzig, 2014. "When adolescents receive sexual messages on the internet: explaining experiences of risk and harm," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 55630, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alana Papageorgiou & Donna Cross & Colleen Fisher, 2022. "Sexualized Images on Social Media and Adolescent Girls’ Mental Health: Qualitative Insights from Parents, School Support Service Staff and Youth Mental Health Service Providers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Cheng Suang Heng & Ben C. F. Choi, 2013. "Research Note —Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 579-595, September.
    2. Lau, Patricia Yin Yin & Tong, Jane L.Y. Terpstra & Lien, Bella Ya-Hui & Hsu, Yen-Chen & Chong, Chooi Ling, 2017. "Ethical work climate, employee commitment and proactive customer service performance: Test of the mediating effects of organizational politics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 20-26.
    3. Mecking, Rebecca-Ariane & Roosen, Jutta, 2015. "Consumer empowerment in food retailing and the role of altruistic motives: an application of the theory of planned behavior," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202698, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Luigi Cembalo & Daniela Caso & Valentina Carfora & Francesco Caracciolo & Alessia Lombardi & Gianni Cicia, 2019. "The “Land of Fires” Toxic Waste Scandal and Its Effect on Consumer Food Choices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Masoud Yazdanpanah & Maryam Tajeri Moghadam & Farhad Javan & Mojtaba Deghanpour & Stefan Sieber & Peyman Falsafi, 2022. "How rationality, morality, and fear shape willingness to carry out organic crop cultivation: a case study of farmers in southwestern Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2145-2163, February.
    6. Jennifer Roberts & Gurleen Popli & Rosemary J. Harris, 2018. "Do environmental concerns affect commuting choices?: hybrid choice modelling with household survey data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(1), pages 299-320, January.
    7. Panico, Teresa & Caracciolo, Francesco & Furno, Marilena, 2022. "Analysing the consumer purchasing behaviour for certified wood products in Italy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    8. Morgan, Jennifer C. & Golden, Shelley D. & Noar, Seth M. & Ribisl, Kurt M. & Southwell, Brian G. & Jeong, Michelle & Hall, Marissa G. & Brewer, Noel T., 2018. "Conversations about pictorial cigarette pack warnings: Theoretical mechanisms of influence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 45-51.
    9. Nicolás Contreras-Barraza & Eduardo Acuña-Duran & Juan Carlos Oyanedel & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2022. "Well-Being and Entrepreneurship Intention: An Empirical Study of New Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Sohni Siddiqui & Anja Schultze-Krumbholz, 2023. "Successful and Emerging Cyberbullying Prevention Programs: A Narrative Review of Seventeen Interventions Applied Worldwide," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, September.
    11. Christine Henle & Charlie Reeve & Virginia Pitts, 2010. "Stealing Time at Work: Attitudes, Social Pressure, and Perceived Control as Predictors of Time Theft," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 53-67, June.
    12. Mohamed, Moataz & Higgins, Christopher D. & Ferguson, Mark & Réquia, Weeberb J., 2018. "The influence of vehicle body type in shaping behavioural intention to acquire electric vehicles: A multi-group structural equation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 54-72.
    13. Carfora, V. & Caso, D. & Conner, M., 2017. "Correlational study and randomised controlled trial for understanding and changing red meat consumption: The role of eating identities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 244-252.
    14. August Francesc Corrons Giménez & Lluís Garay Tamajón, 2019. "An Analysis of the Process of Adopting Local Digital Currencies in Support of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Vasiliki Vamvaka & Chrysostomos Stoforos & Theodosios Palaskas & Charalampos Botsaris, 2020. "Attitude toward entrepreneurship, perceived behavioral control, and entrepreneurial intention: dimensionality, structural relationships, and gender differences," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, December.
    16. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    18. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    19. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    20. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8106-:d:439369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.