IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i11p4169-d370241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Novelty Support and Psychological Needs Satisfaction in Physical Education

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastián Fierro-Suero

    (Psychology and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Huelva, Avda. Tres de marzo s/n, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

  • Bartolomé J. Almagro

    (Psychology and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Huelva, Avda. Tres de marzo s/n, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

  • Pedro Sáenz-López

    (Psychology and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Huelva, Avda. Tres de marzo s/n, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

  • José Carmona-Márquez

    (Psychology and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Huelva, Avda. Tres de marzo s/n, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

Abstract

In recent years, novelty has been proposed as a potential fourth basic psychological need. In the present study, the behavior of novelty resulting from support from the Physical Education teacher was evaluated in 723 students with an average age of 13.30 years old. The first objective was to validate the Support for Basic Psychological Needs-4 (SBPN-4) in Physical Education questionnaire, which included support for the novelty factor. The second objective was to test the mediation model in order to confirm the effect of support for novelty in relation to basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation. The results obtained show that the Support for Basic Psychological Needs-4 (SBPN-4) questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool. On the other hand, support for novelty predicts satisfaction of basic psychological needs, particularly novelty satisfaction, which in turn predicts intrinsic motivation. These results show how the students are capable of perceiving the teacher’s support for novelty and how this positively influences their intrinsic motivation. Further investigations are required to continue developing our knowledge of the role of novelty as a basic psychological need.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastián Fierro-Suero & Bartolomé J. Almagro & Pedro Sáenz-López & José Carmona-Márquez, 2020. "Perceived Novelty Support and Psychological Needs Satisfaction in Physical Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:4169-:d:370241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/4169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/4169/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Meredith, 1993. "Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 525-543, December.
    2. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    3. Ruben Trigueros & Joaquín F. Álvarez & Adolfo J. Cangas & José M. Aguilar-Parra & Cristina Méndez-Aguado & Patricia Rocamora & Remedios López-Liria, 2020. "Validation of the Scale of Basic Psychological Needs towards Physical Exercise, with the Inclusion of Novelty," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Rubén Trigueros & Luis A. Mínguez & Jerónimo J. González-Bernal & José M. Aguilar-Parra & David Padilla & Joaquín F. Álvarez, 2019. "Validation of the Satisfaction Scale of Basic Psychological Needs in Physical Education with the Incorporation of the Novelty in the Spanish Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Albert Satorra & Peter Bentler, 2001. "A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 507-514, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastián Fierro-Suero & Bartolomé J. Almagro & Pedro Sáenz-López, 2020. "Validation of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire for Physical Education (AEQ-PE)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Antonio Baena-Extremera & Pedro Jesús Ruiz-Montero & David Hortigüela-Alcalá, 2021. "Neuroeducation, Motivation, and Physical Activity in Students of Physical Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-5, March.
    3. Cezary Kuśnierz & Aleksandra M. Rogowska & Iuliia Pavlova, 2020. "Examining Gender Differences, Personality Traits, Academic Performance, and Motivation in Ukrainian and Polish Students of Physical Education: A Cross-Cultural Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Juan M. García-Ceberino & Sebastián Feu & María G. Gamero & Sergio J. Ibáñez, 2023. "Structural Relationship between Psychological Needs and Sport Adherence for Students Participating in Physical Education Class," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-10, June.
    5. Sebastián Fierro-Suero & Eduardo José Fernández-Ozcorta & Pedro Sáenz-López, 2022. "Students’ Motivational and Emotional Experiences in Physical Education across Profiles of Extracurricular Physical Activity: The Influence in the Intention to Be Active," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Ana López-Martínez & Lourdes Meroño & María Cánovas-López & Antonio García-de-Alcaraz & Luis Manuel Martínez-Aranda, 2022. "Using Gamified Strategies in Higher Education: Relationship between Intrinsic Motivation and Contextual Variables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Holendro Singh Chungkham & Michael Ingre & Robert Karasek & Hugo Westerlund & Töres Theorell, 2013. "Factor Structure and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Demand Control Support Model: An Evidence from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Sai-fu Fung & Esther Oi-wah Chow & Chau-kiu Cheung, 2020. "Development and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of a Brief Wisdom Development Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Erich Studerus & Alex Gamma & Franz X Vollenweider, 2010. "Psychometric Evaluation of the Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (OAV)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Jorge Sinval & M. Joseph Sirgy & Dong-Jin Lee & João Marôco, 2020. "The Quality of Work Life Scale: Validity Evidence from Brazil and Portugal," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(5), pages 1323-1351, November.
    5. P. Couper, Mick & Cernat, Alexandru & Beth Ofstedal, Mary, 2015. "Estimation of mode effects in the Health and Retirement Study using measurement models," ISER Working Paper Series 2015-19, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    6. Carlos Miguel Lemos & Ross Joseph Gore & Ivan Puga-Gonzalez & F LeRon Shults, 2019. "Dimensionality and factorial invariance of religiosity among Christians and the religiously unaffiliated: A cross-cultural analysis based on the International Social Survey Programme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-36, May.
    7. Yang, Yang & Liu, Qing & Chang, Chia-Hsun, 2023. "China-Europe freight transportation under the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic and government restriction measures," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    8. Jule Specht & Boris Egloff & Stefan C. Schmukle, 2012. "Everything under Control?: The Effects of Age, Gender, and Education on Trajectories of Perceived Control in a Nationally Representative German Sample," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 445, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    9. M. Barendse & F. Oort & G. Garst, 2010. "Using restricted factor analysis with latent moderated structures to detect uniform and nonuniform measurement bias; a simulation study," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 94(2), pages 117-127, June.
    10. Edgar Merkle & Jinyan Fan & Achim Zeileis, 2014. "Testing for Measurement Invariance with Respect to an Ordinal Variable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 569-584, October.
    11. André Pirralha & Wiebke Weber, 2020. "Correction for measurement error in invariance testing: An illustration using SQP," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Yaël Drunen & Bram Spruyt & Filip Droogenbroeck, 2021. "The Salience of Perceived Societal Conflict in Europe: A 27 Country Study on the Development of a Measure for Generalized Conflict Thinking," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 595-635, December.
    13. Nick Lin-Hi & Marlene Reimer & Katharina Schäfer & Johanna Böttcher, 2023. "Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: an empirical analysis of the role of organizational factors," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 707-746, May.
    14. Dirk Temme & Lutz Hildebrandt, 2009. "Gruppenvergleiche bei hypothetischen Konstrukten — Die Prüfung der Übereinstimmung von Messmodellen mit der Strukturgleichungsmethodik," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 138-185, March.
    15. Cristina G. Dumitrache & Laura Rubio & José Luis Cabezas Casado & Eulogio Cordón-Pozo, 2022. "Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey Instrument in a sample of Spanish older adults," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 143-154, March.
    16. Fike, Kayla J. & Mattis, Jacqueline S. & Nickodem, Kyle & Guillaume, Casta, 2023. "Black adolescent altruism: Exploring the role of racial discrimination and empathy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Alexander Robitzsch, 2023. "Modeling Model Misspecification in Structural Equation Models," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Myrsini Katsikatsou & Irini Moustaki, 2016. "Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1046-1068, December.
    19. Laureys, Felien & De Waelle, Silke & Barendse, Maria T. & Lenoir, Matthieu & Deconinck, Frederik J.A., 2022. "The factor structure of executive function in childhood and adolescence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Mayerl, Hannes & Stolz, Erwin & Freidl, Wolfgang, 2020. "Frailty and depression: Reciprocal influences or common causes?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:4169-:d:370241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.