IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v81y2016i4d10.1007_s11336-016-9523-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Myrsini Katsikatsou

    (London School of Economics)

  • Irini Moustaki

    (London School of Economics)

Abstract

Correlated multivariate ordinal data can be analysed with structural equation models. Parameter estimation has been tackled in the literature using limited-information methods including three-stage least squares and pseudo-likelihood estimation methods such as pairwise maximum likelihood estimation. In this paper, two likelihood ratio test statistics and their asymptotic distributions are derived for testing overall goodness-of-fit and nested models, respectively, under the estimation framework of pairwise maximum likelihood estimation. Simulation results show a satisfactory performance of type I error and power for the proposed test statistics and also suggest that the performance of the proposed test statistics is similar to that of the test statistics derived under the three-stage diagonally weighted and unweighted least squares. Furthermore, the corresponding, under the pairwise framework, model selection criteria, AIC and BIC, show satisfactory results in selecting the right model in our simulation examples. The derivation of the likelihood ratio test statistics and model selection criteria under the pairwise framework together with pairwise estimation provide a flexible framework for fitting and testing structural equation models for ordinal as well as for other types of data. The test statistics derived and the model selection criteria are used on data on ‘trust in the police’ selected from the 2010 European Social Survey. The proposed test statistics and the model selection criteria have been implemented in the R package lavaan.

Suggested Citation

  • Myrsini Katsikatsou & Irini Moustaki, 2016. "Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1046-1068, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:81:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11336-016-9523-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-016-9523-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-016-9523-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-016-9523-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan R. Magnus, 1978. "The moments of products of quadratic forms in normal variables," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 32(4), pages 201-210, December.
    2. Steffen Fieuws & Geert Verbeke, 2006. "Pairwise Fitting of Mixed Models for the Joint Modeling of Multivariate Longitudinal Profiles," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 424-431, June.
    3. Cristiano Varin, 2008. "On composite marginal likelihoods," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 92(1), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Cristiano Varin & Paolo Vidoni, 2005. "A note on composite likelihood inference and model selection," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(3), pages 519-528, September.
    5. Joe, Harry & Lee, Youngjo, 2009. "On weighting of bivariate margins in pairwise likelihood," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(4), pages 670-685, April.
    6. Katsikatsou, Myrsini & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan & Jöreskog, Karl G., 2012. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for factor analysis models with ordinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4243-4258.
    7. Wai-Yin Poon & Sik-Yum Lee, 1987. "Maximum likelihood estimation of multivariate polyserial and polychoric correlation coefficients," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 409-430, September.
    8. Lee, Sik-Yum & Poon, Wai-Yin & Bentler, P. M., 1990. "Full maximum likelihood analysis of structural equation models with polytomous variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 91-97, January.
    9. Sik-Yum Lee & Wai-Yin Poon & P. Bentler, 1992. "Structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 89-105, March.
    10. Vassilis Vasdekis & Silvia Cagnone & Irini Moustaki, 2012. "A Composite Likelihood Inference in Latent Variable Models for Ordinal Longitudinal Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 425-441, July.
    11. Albert Maydeu-Olivares & Harry Joe, 2006. "Limited Information Goodness-of-fit Testing in Multidimensional Contingency Tables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 713-732, December.
    12. Asim Ansari & Kamel Jedidi, 2000. "Bayesian factor analysis for multilevel binary observations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 475-496, December.
    13. Varin, Cristiano & Vidoni, Paolo, 2006. "Pairwise likelihood inference for ordinal categorical time series," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 2365-2373, December.
    14. Albert Satorra & Peter Bentler, 2001. "A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 507-514, December.
    15. Asim Ansari & Kamel Jedidi & Laurette Dube, 2002. "Heterogeneous factor analysis models: A bayesian approach," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 49-77, March.
    16. Varin, Cristiano & Host, Gudmund & Skare, Oivind, 2005. "Pairwise likelihood inference in spatial generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 1173-1191, June.
    17. de Leon, A.R., 2005. "Pairwise likelihood approach to grouped continuous model and its extension," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 49-57, November.
    18. Gao, Xin & Song, Peter X.-K., 2010. "Composite Likelihood Bayesian Information Criteria for Model Selection in High-Dimensional Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(492), pages 1531-1540.
    19. Sik-Yum Lee & Wai-Yin Poon & P. Bentler, 1990. "A three-stage estimation procedure for structural equation models with polytomous variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 45-51, March.
    20. Feddag, M.-L. & Bacci, S., 2009. "Pairwise likelihood for the longitudinal mixed Rasch model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1027-1037, February.
    21. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    22. Katsikatsou, Myrsini & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan & Jöreskog, Karl G., 2012. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for factor analysis models with ordinal data," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 43182, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    23. Albert Satorra & Peter Bentler, 2010. "Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 243-248, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ting Wang & Carolin Strobl & Achim Zeileis & Edgar C. Merkle, 2018. "Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 132-155, March.
    2. Colombi, Roberto, 2020. "Selection tests for possibly misspecified hierarchical multinomial marginal models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 136-147.
    3. Papageorgiou, Ioulia & Moustaki, Irini, 2019. "Sampling of pairs in pairwise likelihood estimation for latent variable models with categorical observed variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87592, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Monia Ranalli & Roberto Rocci, 2017. "A Model-Based Approach to Simultaneous Clustering and Dimensional Reduction of Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1007-1034, December.
    5. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber, 2021. "Modeling human thinking about similarities by neuromatrices in the perspective of fuzzy logic," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/21/09, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Papageorgiou, Ioulia & Moustaki, Irini, 2019. "Sampling of pairs in pairwise likelihood estimation for latent variable models with categorical observed variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87592, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Katsikatsou, Myrsini & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan & Jöreskog, Karl G., 2012. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for factor analysis models with ordinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4243-4258.
    3. Florian Schuberth & Jörg Henseler & Theo K. Dijkstra, 2018. "Partial least squares path modeling using ordinal categorical indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 9-35, January.
    4. Battauz, Michela & Vidoni, Paolo, 2022. "A likelihood-based boosting algorithm for factor analysis models with binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Joe, Harry & Lee, Youngjo, 2009. "On weighting of bivariate margins in pairwise likelihood," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(4), pages 670-685, April.
    6. Nuo Xi & Michael W. Browne, 2014. "Contributions to the Underlying Bivariate Normal Method for Factor Analyzing Ordinal Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(6), pages 583-611, December.
    7. Bhat, Chandra R., 2011. "The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 923-939, August.
    8. Monia Ranalli & Roberto Rocci, 2017. "A Model-Based Approach to Simultaneous Clustering and Dimensional Reduction of Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1007-1034, December.
    9. Bhat, Chandra R. & Sener, Ipek N. & Eluru, Naveen, 2010. "A flexible spatially dependent discrete choice model: Formulation and application to teenagers' weekday recreational activity participation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 903-921, September.
    10. Katsikatsou, Myrsini & Moustaki, Irini & Md Jamil, Haziq, 2022. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for confirmatory factor analysis models with categorical variables and data that are missing at random," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108933, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Cristiano Varin, 2008. "On composite marginal likelihoods," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 92(1), pages 1-28, February.
    12. Zhang, Haoran & Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou, 2020. "A note on exploratory item factor analysis by singular value decomposition," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104166, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Hao Bai & Yuan Zhong & Xin Gao & Wei Xu, 2020. "Multivariate Mixed Response Model with Pairwise Composite-Likelihood Method," Stats, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Haoran Zhang & Yunxiao Chen & Xiaoou Li, 2020. "A Note on Exploratory Item Factor Analysis by Singular Value Decomposition," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(2), pages 358-372, June.
    15. Büscher, Sebastian & Bauer, Dietmar, 2024. "Weighting strategies for pairwise composite marginal likelihood estimation in case of unbalanced panels and unaccounted autoregressive structure of the errors," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    16. Vassilis Vasdekis & Silvia Cagnone & Irini Moustaki, 2012. "A Composite Likelihood Inference in Latent Variable Models for Ordinal Longitudinal Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 425-441, July.
    17. K. Florios & I. Moustaki & D. Rizopoulos & V. Vasdekis, 2015. "A modified weighted pairwise likelihood estimator for a class of random effects models," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 73(2), pages 217-228, August.
    18. Alexander Robitzsch, 2021. "A Comprehensive Simulation Study of Estimation Methods for the Rasch Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Zachary F. Fisher & Kenneth A. Bollen, 2020. "An Instrumental Variable Estimator for Mixed Indicators: Analytic Derivatives and Alternative Parameterizations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 660-683, September.
    20. Cláudia Santos & Isabel Pereira & Manuel G. Scotto, 2021. "On the theory of periodic multivariate INAR processes," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1291-1348, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:81:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11336-016-9523-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.