IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3472-d358864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Related to Presenteeism among South Korean Workers Exposed to Workplace Psychological Adverse Social Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Jee-Seon Yi

    (School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA)

  • Hyeoneui Kim

    (School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA)

Abstract

Presenteeism negatively affects both individuals and society. This study identified factors of presenteeism among workers in South Korea, especially in relation to exposure to adverse social behaviors. Here, an adverse social behavior refers to any forms of workplace violence or intimidation. This study used the data from 23,164 full-time salaried employees, who participated in the fifth Korean Working Conditions Survey. This study attempted to predict presenteeism based on the exposure to adverse social behaviors and working conditions using logistic regression. Presenteeism was reported in 15.9% of the sample. Presenteeism was significantly higher among workers with the following characteristics: females, aged 40 years or older; middle school graduates; over 40 working hours a week; shift workers; no job-related safety information received; exposure to adverse social behavior and discrimination; and those with a high demand for quantitative work, low job autonomy, high emotional demands, and high job stress. The workers exposed to adverse social behavior showed a higher prevalence of presenteeism (41.2%), and low job autonomy was the most significant predictor of presenteeism. The findings of this study suggest that allowing enough autonomy in job-related roles may help alleviate presenteeism among those who have experienced adverse social behavior at work.

Suggested Citation

  • Jee-Seon Yi & Hyeoneui Kim, 2020. "Factors Related to Presenteeism among South Korean Workers Exposed to Workplace Psychological Adverse Social Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3472-:d:358864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, Claus D. & Andersen, Johan H., 2008. "Going ill to work - What personal circumstances, attitudes and work-related factors are associated with sickness presenteeism?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 956-964, September.
    2. Skagen, Kristian & Collins, Alison M., 2016. "The consequences of sickness presenteeism on health and wellbeing over time: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 169-177.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sari Mansour & Malik Faisal Azeem & Maureen Dollard & Rachael Potter, 2022. "How Psychosocial Safety Climate Helped Alleviate Work Intensification Effects on Presenteeism during the COVID-19 Crisis? A Moderated Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klas Gustafsson & Staffan Marklund & Constanze Leineweber & Gunnar Bergström & Emmanuel Aboagye & Magnus Helgesson, 2020. "Presenteeism, Psychosocial Working Conditions and Work Ability among Care Workers—A Cross-Sectional Swedish Population-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Thomas Leoni & René Böheim, 2018. "Fehlzeitenreport 2018. Krankheits- und unfallbedingte Fehlzeiten in Österreich – Präsentismus und Absentismus," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61487, August.
    3. Marvin Reuter & Morten Wahrendorf & Cristina Di Tecco & Tahira M. Probst & Sascha Ruhle & Valerio Ghezzi & Claudio Barbaranelli & Sergio Iavicoli & Nico Dragano, 2019. "Do Temporary Workers More Often Decide to Work While Sick? Evidence for the Link between Employment Contract and Presenteeism in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Laia Ollé-Espluga & Johanna Muckenhuber & Markus Hadler, 2021. "The ‘economy for the common good’, job quality and workers’ well-being in Austria and Germany," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(1), pages 3-21, March.
    5. Petri Böckerman & Erkki Laukkanen, 2008. "What makes you work while you are sick? Evidence from a survey of union member," Working Papers 244, Työn ja talouden tutkimus LABORE, The Labour Institute for Economic Research LABORE.
    6. Gunnar Bergström & Klas Gustafsson & Emmanuel Aboagye & Staffan Marklund & Gunnar Aronsson & Christina Björklund & Constanze Leineweber, 2020. "A Resourceful Work Environment Moderates the Relationship between Presenteeism and Health. A Study Using Repeated Measures in the Swedish Working Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Boris HirschBy & Daniel S. J. Lechmann & Claus Schnabel, 2017. "Coming to work while sick: an economic theory of presenteeism with an application to German data," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 69(4), pages 1010-1031.
    8. Fiona Cocker & Angela Martin & Jenn Scott & Alison Venn & Kristy Sanderson, 2013. "Psychological Distress, Related Work Attendance, and Productivity Loss in Small-to-Medium Enterprise Owner/Managers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Richard, Sébastien & Skagen, Kristian & Pedersen, Kjeld Møller & Huver, Benjamin, 2017. "Assessing the Propensity for Presenteeism with Sickness Absence Data," DaCHE discussion papers 2017:1, University of Southern Denmark, Dache - Danish Centre for Health Economics.
    10. Bubonya, Melisa & Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Wooden, Mark, 2017. "Mental health and productivity at work: Does what you do matter?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 150-165.
    11. Gürtzgen, Nicole & Hiesinger, Karolin, 2020. "Dismissal protection and long-term sickness absence: First evidence from Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-040, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Helen Collins & Susan Barry & Piotr Dzuga, 2022. "‘Working While Feeling Awful Is Normal’: One Roma’s Experience of Presenteeism," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(2), pages 362-371, April.
    13. Marina Taloyan & Gunnar Aronsson & Constanze Leineweber & Linda Magnusson Hanson & Kristina Alexanderson & Hugo Westerlund, 2012. "Sickness Presenteeism Predicts Suboptimal Self-Rated Health and Sickness Absence: A Nationally Representative Study of the Swedish Working Population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    14. David Candon, 2019. "The joint effect of health shocks and eligibility for social security on labor supply," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(7), pages 969-988, September.
    15. Randi Wågø Aas & Lise Haveraaen & Hildegunn Sagvaag & Mikkel Magnus Thørrisen, 2017. "The influence of alcohol consumption on sickness presenteeism and impaired daily activities. The WIRUS screening study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Takahiro Mori & Tomohisa Nagata & Masako Nagata & Kiminori Odagami & Koji Mori, 2022. "Perceived Supervisor Support for Health Affects Presenteeism: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-10, April.
    17. Alenka Skerjanc & Metoda Dodic Fikfak, 2020. "Sickness Presence among Health Care Professionals: A Cross Sectional Study of Health Care Professionals in Slovenia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, January.
    18. Ana Junça-Silva & Sónia Silva & António Caetano, 2022. "Job crafting, meaningful work and performance: a moderated mediation approach of presenteeism," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-21, April.
    19. Stefan Pichler & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2020. "Labor Market Effects of U.S. Sick Pay Mandates," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 55(2), pages 611-659.
    20. Kin Cheung & Mimi M. Y. Tse & Chi Kan Wong & Kwan Wai Mui & Siu Kan Lee & Ka Yan Ma & Keith T. S. Tung & Echo Ping Woi Lau, 2019. "The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Exercise Program in Managing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Symptoms for Low-Skilled Workers in the Low-Income Community: A Pre-Post-Follow-Up Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-11, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3472-:d:358864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.