IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i12p14999-15485d60128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Grandma, You Should Do It—It’s Cool” Older Adults and the Role of Family Members in Their Acceptance of Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Katrien Luijkx

    (Tilburg University, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Tranzo, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands)

  • Sebastiaan Peek

    (Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Allied Health Professions, Chair of Health Innovations and Technology, and Tilburg University, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Tranzo, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Eveline Wouters

    (Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Allied Health Professions, Chair of Health Innovations and Technology, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Despite its potential, the acceptance of technology to support the ability to live independently in one’s own home, also called aging in place, is not optimal. Family members may play a key role in technology acceptance by older adults; however, it is not well understood why and how they exert influence. Based on open interviews with 53 community-dwelling older adults, this paper describes the influence of family members, including spouses, on the use of various types of consumer electronics by older adults as was reported by themselves. Such a broad focus enables understanding the use of technology as was reported by older adults, instead of its intended use. Our study reveals that the influence of each family member has its own characteristics. The influence of technology acceptance is a natural and coincidental part of the interaction with spouses and grandchildren in which entertainment and pleasure are prominent. This is also partly true for the influence of children, but their influence also is intentional and driven by concerns. Our study indicates the importance of including all family members when implementing technology in the lives of older adults. Besides information for children about the use(fullness) of devices, it is worthwhile to give grandchildren an important role, because older adults easily adopt their enthusiasm and it might eventually lighten the burden on children.

Suggested Citation

  • Katrien Luijkx & Sebastiaan Peek & Eveline Wouters, 2015. "“Grandma, You Should Do It—It’s Cool” Older Adults and the Role of Family Members in Their Acceptance of Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:12:p:14999-15485:d:60128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/12/14999/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/12/14999/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Davidson, Rosemary & Bicket, Martha & Whitmarsh, Lorraine, 2013. "Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 363-374.
    2. Chuan-Jun Su & Chang-Yu Chiang, 2013. "IAServ: An Intelligent Home Care Web Services Platform in a Cloud for Aging-in-Place," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Gonzalo Correa & Miquel Domènech, 2013. "Care Networking: A Study of Technical Mediations in a Home Telecare Service," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Kattika Thanakwang & Kusol Soonthorndhada & Jiraporn Mongkolprasoet, 2012. "Perspectives on healthy aging among Thai elderly: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 472-479, December.
    5. Ke Chen & Alan Hoi-shou Chan, 2013. "Use or Non-Use of Gerontechnology—A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naughton Mary McDonnell, 2024. "Concepts of Ethics to Engage the Older Person with the Community," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1045-1057.
    2. Katrien Luijkx & Leonieke van Boekel & Meriam Janssen & Marjolein Verbiest & Annerieke Stoop, 2020. "The Academic Collaborative Center Older Adults: A Description of Co-Creation between Science, Care Practice and Education with the Aim to Contribute to Person-Centered Care for Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Xianru Shang & Zijian Liu & Chen Gong & Zhigang Hu & Yuexuan Wu & Chengliang Wang, 2024. "Knowledge mapping and evolution of research on older adults’ technology acceptance: a bibliometric study from 2013 to 2023," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Lei, Lei & Yu, Dandan & Zhou, Yang, 2023. "Better educated children, better Internet-connected elderly parents," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katrien Luijkx & Leonieke van Boekel & Meriam Janssen & Marjolein Verbiest & Annerieke Stoop, 2020. "The Academic Collaborative Center Older Adults: A Description of Co-Creation between Science, Care Practice and Education with the Aim to Contribute to Person-Centered Care for Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Xu, Xiaojing & Chen, Chien-fei & Zhu, Xiaojuan & Hu, Qinran, 2018. "Promoting acceptance of direct load control programs in the United States: Financial incentive versus control option," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1278-1287.
    3. Ting Mei & Hui Liu & Bingrui Tong & Chaozhen Tong & Junjie Zhu & Yuxuan Wang & Mengyao Kou, 2025. "Exploring Knowledge Domain of Intelligent Safety and Security Studies by Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Younjoo Cho & Anseop Choi, 2020. "Application of Affordance Factors for User-Centered Smart Homes: A Case Study Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Łukasz Brzeziński & Magdalena Krystyna Wyrwicka, 2022. "Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-52, November.
    6. Attour, Amel & Baudino, Marco & Krafft, Jackie & Lazaric, Nathalie, 2020. "Determinants of energy tracking application use at the city level: Evidence from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Tuochen Li & Siran Wang, 2021. "How to Improve the Public Trust of the Intelligent Aging Community: An Empirical Study Based on the ACSI Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Birgul Basarir-Ozel & Hande Bahar Turker & Vesile Aslihan Nasir, 2022. "Identifying the Key Drivers and Barriers of Smart Home Adoption: A Thematic Analysis from the Business Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Drysdale, Brian & Wu, Jianzhong & Jenkins, Nick, 2015. "Flexible demand in the GB domestic electricity sector in 2030," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 281-290.
    10. Wilson, Charlie & Hargreaves, Tom & Hauxwell-Baldwin, Richard, 2017. "Benefits and risks of smart home technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-83.
    11. Petra Mesarić & Damira Đukec & Slavko Krajcar, 2017. "Exploring the Potential of Energy Consumers in Smart Grid Using Focus Group Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Buchanan, Kathryn & Banks, Nick & Preston, Ian & Russo, Riccardo, 2016. "The British public’s perception of the UK smart metering initiative: Threats and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 87-97.
    13. El Barachi, May & Salim, Taghreed Abu & Nyadzayo, Munyaradzi W. & Mathew, Sujith & Badewi, Amgad & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2022. "The relationship between citizen readiness and the intention to continuously use smart city services: Mediating effects of satisfaction and discomfort," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Yilmaz, Selin & Cuony, Peter & Chanez, Cédric & Patel, Martin Kumar, 2024. "Communication strategies and consumer acceptance of utility-controlled heat pumps and electric vehicles," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Paterakis, Nikolaos G. & Erdinç, Ozan & Catalão, João P.S., 2017. "An overview of Demand Response: Key-elements and international experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 871-891.
    16. Pal, Debajyoti & Zhang, Xiangmin & Siyal, Saeed, 2021. "Prohibitive factors to the acceptance of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in society: A smart-home context using a resistive modelling approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    17. Julien Lancelot Michellod & Declan Kuch & Christian Winzer & Martin K. Patel & Selin Yilmaz, 2022. "Building Social License for Automated Demand-Side Management—Case Study Research in the Swiss Residential Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Sojung Kim & Henri Christiaans & Joon Sang Baek, 2019. "Smart Homes as Product-Service Systems: Two Focal Areas for Developing Competitive Smart Home Appliances," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 292-310, December.
    19. Armin Razmjoo & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Lisa Gakenia Kaigutha & Mousa Marzband & Seyedali Mirjalili & Mehdi Pazhoohesh & Saim Memon & Mehdi A. Ehyaei & Giuseppe Piras, 2021. "Investigating Smart City Development Based on Green Buildings, Electrical Vehicles and Feasible Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Gosnell, Greer & McCoy, Daire, 2023. "Market failures and willingness to accept smart meters: Experimental evidence from the UK," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:12:p:14999-15485:d:60128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.