IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i12p14999-15485d60128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Grandma, You Should Do It—It’s Cool” Older Adults and the Role of Family Members in Their Acceptance of Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Katrien Luijkx

    (Tilburg University, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Tranzo, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands)

  • Sebastiaan Peek

    (Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Allied Health Professions, Chair of Health Innovations and Technology, and Tilburg University, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Tranzo, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Eveline Wouters

    (Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Allied Health Professions, Chair of Health Innovations and Technology, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Despite its potential, the acceptance of technology to support the ability to live independently in one’s own home, also called aging in place, is not optimal. Family members may play a key role in technology acceptance by older adults; however, it is not well understood why and how they exert influence. Based on open interviews with 53 community-dwelling older adults, this paper describes the influence of family members, including spouses, on the use of various types of consumer electronics by older adults as was reported by themselves. Such a broad focus enables understanding the use of technology as was reported by older adults, instead of its intended use. Our study reveals that the influence of each family member has its own characteristics. The influence of technology acceptance is a natural and coincidental part of the interaction with spouses and grandchildren in which entertainment and pleasure are prominent. This is also partly true for the influence of children, but their influence also is intentional and driven by concerns. Our study indicates the importance of including all family members when implementing technology in the lives of older adults. Besides information for children about the use(fullness) of devices, it is worthwhile to give grandchildren an important role, because older adults easily adopt their enthusiasm and it might eventually lighten the burden on children.

Suggested Citation

  • Katrien Luijkx & Sebastiaan Peek & Eveline Wouters, 2015. "“Grandma, You Should Do It—It’s Cool” Older Adults and the Role of Family Members in Their Acceptance of Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:12:p:14999-15485:d:60128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/12/14999/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/12/14999/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gonzalo Correa & Miquel Domènech, 2013. "Care Networking: A Study of Technical Mediations in a Home Telecare Service," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Davidson, Rosemary & Bicket, Martha & Whitmarsh, Lorraine, 2013. "Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 363-374.
    3. Chuan-Jun Su & Chang-Yu Chiang, 2013. "IAServ: An Intelligent Home Care Web Services Platform in a Cloud for Aging-in-Place," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Kattika Thanakwang & Kusol Soonthorndhada & Jiraporn Mongkolprasoet, 2012. "Perspectives on healthy aging among Thai elderly: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 472-479, December.
    5. Ke Chen & Alan Hoi-shou Chan, 2013. "Use or Non-Use of Gerontechnology—A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naughton Mary McDonnell, 2024. "Concepts of Ethics to Engage the Older Person with the Community," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1045-1057.
    2. Katrien Luijkx & Leonieke van Boekel & Meriam Janssen & Marjolein Verbiest & Annerieke Stoop, 2020. "The Academic Collaborative Center Older Adults: A Description of Co-Creation between Science, Care Practice and Education with the Aim to Contribute to Person-Centered Care for Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Xianru Shang & Zijian Liu & Chen Gong & Zhigang Hu & Yuexuan Wu & Chengliang Wang, 2024. "Knowledge mapping and evolution of research on older adults’ technology acceptance: a bibliometric study from 2013 to 2023," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Lei, Lei & Yu, Dandan & Zhou, Yang, 2023. "Better educated children, better Internet-connected elderly parents," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katrien Luijkx & Leonieke van Boekel & Meriam Janssen & Marjolein Verbiest & Annerieke Stoop, 2020. "The Academic Collaborative Center Older Adults: A Description of Co-Creation between Science, Care Practice and Education with the Aim to Contribute to Person-Centered Care for Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Nicole D. Sintov & P. Wesley Schultz, 2017. "Adjustable Green Defaults Can Help Make Smart Homes More Sustainable," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Xu, Xiaojing & Chen, Chien-fei & Zhu, Xiaojuan & Hu, Qinran, 2018. "Promoting acceptance of direct load control programs in the United States: Financial incentive versus control option," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1278-1287.
    4. Chamaret, Cécile & Steyer, Véronique & Mayer, Julie C., 2020. "“Hands off my meter!” when municipalities resist smart meters: Linking arguments and degrees of resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Younjoo Cho & Anseop Choi, 2020. "Application of Affordance Factors for User-Centered Smart Homes: A Case Study Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Song, Wenyan, 2022. "Identifying critical factors in systems with interrelated components: A method considering heterogeneous influence and strength attenuation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 456-470.
    7. Tu, Gengyang & Faure, Corinne & Schleich, Joachim & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte, 2021. "The heat is off! The role of technology attributes and individual attitudes in the diffusion of Smart thermostats – findings from a multi-country survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Łukasz Brzeziński & Magdalena Krystyna Wyrwicka, 2022. "Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-52, November.
    9. Attour, Amel & Baudino, Marco & Krafft, Jackie & Lazaric, Nathalie, 2020. "Determinants of energy tracking application use at the city level: Evidence from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Su-Yen Chen & Chiachun Lee, 2019. "Perceptions of the Impact of High-Level-Machine-Intelligence from University Students in Taiwan: The Case for Human Professions, Autonomous Vehicles, and Smart Homes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Tuochen Li & Siran Wang, 2021. "How to Improve the Public Trust of the Intelligent Aging Community: An Empirical Study Based on the ACSI Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Birgul Basarir-Ozel & Hande Bahar Turker & Vesile Aslihan Nasir, 2022. "Identifying the Key Drivers and Barriers of Smart Home Adoption: A Thematic Analysis from the Business Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Hong Tao & Susan McRoy & Lin Wang, 2017. "Would mobile health be a solution to rehospitalization?," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 188-190, June.
    15. Freier, Julia & von Loessl, Victor, 2022. "Dynamic electricity tariffs: Designing reasonable pricing schemes for private households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Drysdale, Brian & Wu, Jianzhong & Jenkins, Nick, 2015. "Flexible demand in the GB domestic electricity sector in 2030," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 281-290.
    17. Wilson, Charlie & Hargreaves, Tom & Hauxwell-Baldwin, Richard, 2017. "Benefits and risks of smart home technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-83.
    18. Muhammad Athar Nadeem & Zhiying Liu & Abdul Hameed Pitafi & Amna Younis & Yi Xu, 2021. "Investigating the Adoption Factors of Cryptocurrencies—A Case of Bitcoin: Empirical Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, March.
    19. Petra Mesarić & Damira Đukec & Slavko Krajcar, 2017. "Exploring the Potential of Energy Consumers in Smart Grid Using Focus Group Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Buchanan, Kathryn & Banks, Nick & Preston, Ian & Russo, Riccardo, 2016. "The British public’s perception of the UK smart metering initiative: Threats and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 87-97.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:12:p:14999-15485:d:60128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.