IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9053-d870219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying the Key Drivers and Barriers of Smart Home Adoption: A Thematic Analysis from the Business Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Birgul Basarir-Ozel

    (Department of Management Information Systems, Bogazici University, Istanbul 34342, Turkey)

  • Hande Bahar Turker

    (Department of Management Information Systems, Bogazici University, Istanbul 34342, Turkey)

  • Vesile Aslihan Nasir

    (Department of Management Information Systems, Bogazici University, Istanbul 34342, Turkey)

Abstract

Smart homes embrace advanced technologies and the connectedness of devices that aim to increase consumers’ life quality. They are based on data integration over shared platforms collected via sensors and wireless networks. However, although consumers’ current and potential adoption of smart homes have received some research interest, there is a low number of studies considering the foreseeable future of smart homes from the business perspective. To fulfill this gap in the literature, this study presents the results of an exploratory research attempting to reveal the foresight of the business side regarding the penetration of smart home technologies (SHTs) into consumers’ lives. Based on the opinions of industry experts collected through 13 semistructured in-depth interviews, numerous drivers of and barriers to SHT adoption are uncovered and displayed in their intertwined relationship in a thematic map. In creating this map, the qualitative data gathered through the interviews are integrated with widely used theories/models of technology adoption in the literature to develop a full-fledged set of determinants. As a result, drivers of SHT adoption (five sub-themes) and barriers that hinder smart home penetration (eight subthemes) were determined. Drivers consist of relative advantage, enjoyment, image enhancement, modern and multifunctional design, and consumers’ technology innovativeness. In contrast, the main barriers are high cost, complexity, lack of compatibility, lack of trialability, lack of observability, lack of a trusted brand in the market, lack of facilitating conditions and support services, and consumers’ technology anxiety. This rich set of SHT adoption determinants can be used in future studies to examine their relative impact on consumers’ adoption of SHT.

Suggested Citation

  • Birgul Basarir-Ozel & Hande Bahar Turker & Vesile Aslihan Nasir, 2022. "Identifying the Key Drivers and Barriers of Smart Home Adoption: A Thematic Analysis from the Business Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9053-:d:870219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9053/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9053/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hsu, Chin-Lung & Lu, Hsi-Peng & Hsu, Huei-Hsia, 2007. "Adoption of the mobile Internet: An empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS)," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 715-726, December.
    2. Wei Gu & Peng Bao & Wenyuan Hao & Jaewoong Kim, 2019. "Empirical Examination of Intention to Continue to Use Smart Home Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Davidson, Rosemary & Bicket, Martha & Whitmarsh, Lorraine, 2013. "Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 363-374.
    4. Franceschinis, Cristiano & Thiene, Mara & Scarpa, Riccardo & Rose, John & Moretto, Michele & Cavalli, Raffaele, 2017. "Adoption of renewable heating systems: An empirical test of the diffusion of innovation theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 313-326.
    5. Alexandra-Gwyn Paetz & Elisabeth Dütschke & Wolf Fichtner, 2012. "Smart Homes as a Means to Sustainable Energy Consumption: A Study of Consumer Perceptions," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 23-41, March.
    6. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D., 2020. "Smart home technologies in Europe: A critical review of concepts, benefits, risks and policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Jamie Bennett & Osvaldas Rokas & Liming Chen, 2017. "Healthcare in the Smart Home: A Study of Past, Present and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Michael D. Williams & Viswanath Venkatesh, 2008. "Guest Editorial: A profile of adoption of Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) research in the household context," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 385-390, September.
    9. Alladi Venkatesh, 2008. "Digital home technologies and transformation of households," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 391-395, September.
    10. Marikyan, Davit & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2019. "A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 139-154.
    11. Hong, Areum & Nam, Changi & Kim, Seongcheol, 2020. "What will be the possible barriers to consumers’ adoption of smart home services?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    12. Tony Woodall & Julie Rosborough & John Harvey, 2018. "Proposal, project, practice, pause: Developing a framework for evaluating smart domestic product engagement," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(1), pages 58-74, June.
    13. van Oorschot, Johannes A.W.H. & Hofman, Erwin & Halman, Johannes I.M., 2018. "A bibliometric review of the innovation adoption literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-21.
    14. Jong Hyuk Park & Ching-Hsien Hsu & Hamid R. Arabnia, 2009. "Intelligent systems and smart homes," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 481-482, November.
    15. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    16. Shin, Jungwoo & Park, Yuri & Lee, Daeho, 2018. "Who will be smart home users? An analysis of adoption and diffusion of smart homes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 246-253.
    17. Susan A. Brown, 2008. "Household technology adoption, use, and impacts: Past, present, and future," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 397-402, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Basarir-Ozel, Birgul & Nasir, V. Aslihan & Turker, Hande B., 2023. "Determinants of smart home adoption and differences across technology readiness segments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Olugbenga Timo Oladinrin & Jayantha Wadu Mesthrige & Lekan Damilola Ojo & João Alencastro & Muhammad Rana, 2023. "Smart Home Technologies to Facilitate Ageing-in-Place: Professionals Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Basarir-Ozel, Birgul & Nasir, V. Aslihan & Turker, Hande B., 2023. "Determinants of smart home adoption and differences across technology readiness segments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Attour, Amel & Baudino, Marco & Krafft, Jackie & Lazaric, Nathalie, 2020. "Determinants of energy tracking application use at the city level: Evidence from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Pal, Debajyoti & Zhang, Xiangmin & Siyal, Saeed, 2021. "Prohibitive factors to the acceptance of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in society: A smart-home context using a resistive modelling approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Wei Gu & Peng Bao & Wenyuan Hao & Jaewoong Kim, 2019. "Empirical Examination of Intention to Continue to Use Smart Home Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Amel Attour & Marco Baudino & Jackie Krafft & Nathalie Lazaric, 2020. "Determinants of smart energy tracking application use at the city level: Evidence from France," Post-Print hal-02942483, HAL.
    7. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D., 2020. "Smart home technologies in Europe: A critical review of concepts, benefits, risks and policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Sven Laumer & Andreas Eckhardt & Natascha Trunk, 2010. "Do as your parents say?—Analyzing IT adoption influencing factors for full and under age applicants," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 169-183, April.
    9. Elodie Attié & Lars Meyer-Waarden, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Post-Print hal-04065165, HAL.
    10. Savvas Papagiannidis & Dinara Davlembayeva, 2022. "Bringing Smart Home Technology to Peer-to-Peer Accommodation: Exploring the Drivers of Intention to Stay in Smart Accommodation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1189-1208, August.
    11. Tu, Gengyang & Faure, Corinne & Schleich, Joachim & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte, 2021. "The heat is off! The role of technology attributes and individual attitudes in the diffusion of Smart thermostats – findings from a multi-country survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. Große-Kreul, Felix, 2022. "What will drive household adoption of smart energy? Insights from a consumer acceptance study in Germany," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    13. Daniel J. Mallinson & Saahir Shafi, 2022. "Smart home technology: Challenges and opportunities for collaborative governance and policy research," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(3), pages 330-352, May.
    14. Raphael Iten & Joël Wagner & Angela Zeier Röschmann, 2021. "On the Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Risks in Smart Homes: A Systematic Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-30, June.
    15. Li, Wenda & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Liu, Aaron & Erol, Isil, 2022. "Mapping two decades of smart home research: A systematic scientometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Han, Yawen & Du, Xin & Zhang, Hengming & Ni, Jinfeng & Fan, Fengyan, 2024. "Does smart home adoption reduce household electricity-related CO2 emissions? ——Evidence from Hangzhou city, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    17. Pettifor, Hazel & Wilson, Charlie, 2020. "Low carbon innovations for mobility, food, homes and energy: A synthesis of consumer attributes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. WeiYu Ji & Edwin H. W. Chan, 2019. "Critical Factors Influencing the Adoption of Smart Home Energy Technology in China: A Guangdong Province Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, November.
    19. Helen J. Richardson, 2009. "A ‘smart house’ is not a home: The domestication of ICTs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 599-608, November.
    20. Wenqing Zhang & Liangliang Liu, 2022. "How consumers’ adopting intentions towards eco-friendly smart home services are shaped? An extended technology acceptance model," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(2), pages 307-330, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9053-:d:870219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.