IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i1p138-d1558356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment and Analysis of Waste Treatment and Environmental Management

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Oleniacz

    (Department of Environmental Management and Protection, Faculty of Geo-Data Science, Geodesy and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Krakow, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Grzesik

    (Department of Environmental Management and Protection, Faculty of Geo-Data Science, Geodesy and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Krakow, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

The waste management sector plays a crucial role within the broader environmental management system [...]

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Oleniacz & Katarzyna Grzesik, 2025. "Assessment and Analysis of Waste Treatment and Environmental Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:138-:d:1558356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wissem Mnif & Faouzi Ben Rebah, 2023. "Bioflocculants as Alternative to Synthetic Polymers to Enhance Wastewater Sludge Dewaterability: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Dominika Dabrowska & Wojciech Rykala & Vahid Nourani, 2023. "Causes, Types and Consequences of Municipal Waste Landfill Fires—Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Sciubba, Enrico & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2005. "Emergy and exergy analyses: Complementary methods or irreducible ideological options?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 1953-1988.
    4. Sonja Cerar & Luka Serianz & Katja Koren & Joerg Prestor & Nina Mali, 2022. "Synoptic Risk Assessment of Groundwater Contamination from Landfills," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Piotr Jakubowicz & Teresa Steliga & Katarzyna Wojtowicz, 2022. "Analysis of Temperature Influence on Precipitation of Secondary Sediments during Water Injection into an Absorptive Well," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Monika Czop & Beata Łaźniewska-Piekarczyk & Małgorzata Kajda-Szcześniak, 2022. "Evaluation of the Immobilization of Fly Ash from the Incineration of Municipal Waste in Cement Mortar Incorporating Nanomaterials—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Atilgan Atilgan & Anna Krakowiak-Bal & Hasan Ertop & Burak Saltuk & Mateusz Malinowski, 2023. "The Energy Potential of Waste from Banana Production: A Case Study of the Mediterranean Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Boško Josimović & Božidar Manić & Nikola Krunić, 2022. "Strategic Environmental Assessment as a Support in a Sustainable National Waste Management Program—European Experience in Serbia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Arkadiusz Nędzarek & Małgorzata Bonisławska & Agnieszka Tórz & Adam Tański & Krzysztof Formicki, 2022. "Effect of Filter Medium on Water Quality during Passive Biofilter Activation in a Recirculating Aquaculture System for Oncorhynchus mykiss," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nielsen, S.N. & Müller, F., 2009. "Understanding the functional principles of nature—Proposing another type of ecosystem services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(16), pages 1913-1925.
    2. Sun, Jingchao & Na, Hongming & Yan, Tianyi & Che, Zichang & Qiu, Ziyang & Yuan, Yuxing & Li, Yingnan & Du, Tao & Song, Yanli & Fang, Xin, 2022. "Cost-benefit assessment of manufacturing system using comprehensive value flow analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    3. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Christoph Sejkora & Lisa Kühberger & Fabian Radner & Alexander Trattner & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Exergy as Criteria for Efficient Energy Systems—A Spatially Resolved Comparison of the Current Exergy Consumption, the Current Useful Exergy Demand and Renewable Exergy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-51, February.
    5. Baral, Anil & Bakshi, Bhavik R., 2010. "Emergy analysis using US economic input–output models with applications to life cycles of gasoline and corn ethanol," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(15), pages 1807-1818.
    6. Bastianoni, S. & Facchini, A. & Susani, L. & Tiezzi, E., 2007. "Emergy as a function of exergy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1158-1162.
    7. Almeida, C.M.V.B. & Borges, D. & Bonilla, S.H. & Giannetti, B.F., 2010. "Identifying improvements in water management of bus-washing stations in Brazil," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 821-831.
    8. Zhang, Xiao Hong & Deng, ShiHuai & Jiang, WenJu & Zhang, YanZong & Peng, Hong & Li, Li & Yang, Gang & Li, YuanWei, 2010. "Emergy evaluation of the sustainability of two industrial systems based on wastes exchanges," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 182-195.
    9. Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Rao, D.S. Prasada, 2010. "Measuring and decomposing sustainable efficiency in agricultural production: A cumulative exergy balance approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1765-1776, July.
    10. Ting Chang & Degang Yang & Jinwei Huo & Fuqiang Xia & Zhiping Zhang, 2018. "Evaluation of Oasis Sustainability Based on Emergy and Decomposition Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Gasparatos, Alexandros & El-Haram, Mohamed & Horner, Malcolm, 2009. "The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 245-256.
    12. Giannetti, B.F. & Almeida, C.M.V.B. & Bonilla, S.H., 2010. "Comparing emergy accounting with well-known sustainability metrics: The case of Southern Cone Common Market, Mercosur," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3518-3526, July.
    13. Bonilla, Silvia H. & Papalardo, Fábio & Tassinari, Celso A. & Sacomano, Jose B. & de Carvalho, Fabio Romeu, 2019. "Contribution of the Paraconsistent Tri-Annotated Logic to emergy accounting and decision making," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 98-106.
    14. Mario Martín-Gamboa & Diego Iribarren, 2016. "Dynamic Ecocentric Assessment Combining Emergy and Data Envelopment Analysis: Application to Wind Farms," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, January.
    15. Lucia, Umberto & Sciubba, Enrico, 2013. "From Lotka to the entropy generation approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(17), pages 3634-3639.
    16. Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Norani, Marziye, 2021. "Sustainability assessment and emergy analysis of employing the CCHP system under two different scenarios in a data center," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Ulgiati, Sergio & Zucaro, Amalia & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2011. "Shared wealth or nobody's land? The worth of natural capital and ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 778-787, February.
    18. Ju, L.P. & Chen, B., 2011. "Embodied energy and emergy evaluation of a typical biodiesel production chain in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2385-2392.
    19. Simpson, Adam P. & Edwards, Chris F., 2013. "The utility of environmental exergy analysis for decision making in energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 742-751.
    20. Sciubba, Enrico, 2011. "What did Lotka really say? A critical reassessment of the “maximum power principle”," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1347-1353.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    n/a;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:138-:d:1558356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.