IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i24p6381-d1546971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wind Turbine Static Errors Related to Yaw, Pitch or Anemometer Apparatus: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Related Performance Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Astolfi

    (Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

  • Silvia Iuliano

    (Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, Piazza Roma 21, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Antony Vasile

    (Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

  • Marco Pasetti

    (Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

  • Salvatore Dello Iacono

    (Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

  • Alfredo Vaccaro

    (Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, Piazza Roma 21, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

Abstract

The optimization of the efficiency of wind turbine systems is a fundamental task, from the perspective of a growing share of electricity produced from wind. Despite this, and given the complex multivariate dependence of the power of wind turbines on environmental conditions and working parameters, the literature is lacking studies specifically devoted to a careful characterization of wind farm performance. In particular, in the literature, it is overlooked that there are several types of faults which have similar manifestations and that can be defined as static errors. This kind of error manifests as a static bias occurring from a certain time onward, which can affect the anemometer, the absolute or relative pitch of the blades, or the yaw system. Static or systematic errors typically do not cause the functional failure of the wind turbine system, but they deserve attention due to the fact that they cause power production loss throughout the operation time. Based on this, the first objective of the present study is a critical review of the recent papers devoted to three types of wind turbine static errors: anemometer bias, static yaw error, and pitch misalignment. As a result, a comprehensive viewpoint, enhancing the state of the art in the literature, is developed in this study. Given that the use of data collected by Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems has, up to now, been prevailing for the diagnosis of systematic errors compared to the use of further specific sensors, particular attention in the present study is thus devoted to the discussion of the phenomena which can be observable through SCADA data analysis. Based on this, finally, a rigorous work flow is formulated for detecting static errors and discriminating among them through SCADA data analysis. Nevertheless, methods based on additional information sources (like further sensors or meteorological data) are also discussed. An important aspect of this study is that, for each considered type of systematic error, some previously unpublished results based on real-world SCADA data are reported in order to corroborate the proposed framework. Summarizing, then, the present is the first paper which considers and discusses several types of wind turbine static errors in a unified viewpoint, correctly interprets apparently controversial results collected in the literature, and finally provides guidelines for the diagnosis of this kind of error and for the quantification of the performance drop associated with their presence.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Astolfi & Silvia Iuliano & Antony Vasile & Marco Pasetti & Salvatore Dello Iacono & Alfredo Vaccaro, 2024. "Wind Turbine Static Errors Related to Yaw, Pitch or Anemometer Apparatus: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Related Performance Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-34, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6381-:d:1546971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6381/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arkaitz Rabanal & Alain Ulazia & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Unai Elosegui, 2018. "MIDAS: A Benchmarking Multi-Criteria Method for the Identification of Defective Anemometers in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Francesco Mazzeo & Derek Micheletto & Alessandro Talamelli & Antonio Segalini, 2022. "An Experimental Study on a Wind Turbine Rotor Affected by Pitch Imbalance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Unai Elosegui & Igor Egana & Alain Ulazia & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi, 2018. "Pitch Angle Misalignment Correction Based on Benchmarking and Laser Scanner Measurement in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Jorge Maldonado-Correa & Sergio Martín-Martínez & Estefanía Artigao & Emilio Gómez-Lázaro, 2020. "Using SCADA Data for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Francesco Castellani & Ravi Pandit & Francesco Natili & Francesca Belcastro & Davide Astolfi, 2023. "Advanced Methods for Wind Turbine Performance Analysis Based on SCADA Data and CFD Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Dalala, Zakariya & Al-Omari, Murad & Al-Addous, Mohammad & Bdour, Mathhar & Al-Khasawneh, Yaqoub & Alkasrawi, Malek, 2022. "Increased renewable energy penetration in national electrical grids constraints and solutions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    7. Aiman Abbas Mahar & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat & Bhawani S. Chowdhry & Laveet Kumar & Quynh T. Tran & Gaetano Zizzo, 2023. "Condition Assessment and Analysis of Bearing of Doubly Fed Wind Turbines Using Machine Learning Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Mansoor Soomro & Zubair Ahmed Memon & Mazhar Hussain Baloch & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat & Laveet Kumar & Quynh T. Tran & Gaetano Zizzo, 2023. "Performance Improvement of Grid-Integrated Doubly Fed Induction Generator under Asymmetrical and Symmetrical Faults," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Nasery, Praanjal & Aziz Ezzat, Ahmed, 2023. "Yaw-adjusted wind power curve modeling: A local regression approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1368-1376.
    10. Lorin Jenkel & Stefan Jonas & Angela Meyer, 2023. "Privacy-Preserving Fleet-Wide Learning of Wind Turbine Conditions with Federated Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, September.
    11. Jing, Bo & Qian, Zheng & Pei, Yan & Zhang, Lizhong & Yang, Tingyi, 2020. "Improving wind turbine efficiency through detection and calibration of yaw misalignment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1217-1227.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuting Wan & Kanru Cheng & Xiaoling Sheng & Xuan Wang, 2019. "Characteristic Analysis of DFIG Wind Turbine under Blade Mass Imbalance Fault in View of Wind Speed Spatiotemporal Distribution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Ravi Kumar Pandit & Davide Astolfi & Isidro Durazo Cardenas, 2023. "A Review of Predictive Techniques Used to Support Decision Making for Maintenance Operations of Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Mehlan, Felix C. & Nejad, Amir R., 2023. "Rotor imbalance detection and diagnosis in floating wind turbines by means of drivetrain condition monitoring," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 70-81.
    4. Arkaitz Rabanal & Alain Ulazia & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Unai Elosegui, 2018. "MIDAS: A Benchmarking Multi-Criteria Method for the Identification of Defective Anemometers in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Ye, Feng & Ezzat, Ahmed Aziz, 2024. "Icing detection and prediction for wind turbines using multivariate sensor data and machine learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Alain Ulazia & Ander Nafarrate & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Sheila Carreno-Madinabeitia, 2019. "The Consequences of Air Density Variations over Northeastern Scotland for Offshore Wind Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Xiao Chen & Martin A. Eder & Asm Shihavuddin & Dan Zheng, 2021. "A Human-Cyber-Physical System toward Intelligent Wind Turbine Operation and Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-10, January.
    8. Alessandro Murgia & Robbert Verbeke & Elena Tsiporkova & Ludovico Terzi & Davide Astolfi, 2023. "Discussion on the Suitability of SCADA-Based Condition Monitoring for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis through Temperature Data Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Daniele Candelaresi & Giuseppe Spazzafumo, 2023. "Production of Substitute Natural Gas Integrated with Allam Cycle for Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Riccardo Fraboni & Gianluca Grazieschi & Simon Pezzutto & Benjamin Mitterrutzner & Eric Wilczynski, 2023. "Environmental Assessment of Residential Space Heating and Cooling Technologies in Europe: A Review of 11 European Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Tingting Cai & Sutong Liu & Gangui Yan & Hongbo Liu, 2019. "Analysis of Doubly Fed Induction Generators Participating in Continuous Frequency Regulation with Different Wind Speeds Considering Regulation Power Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Oscar Garcia & Alain Ulazia & Mario del Rio & Sheila Carreno-Madinabeitia & Andoni Gonzalez-Arceo, 2019. "An Energy Potential Estimation Methodology and Novel Prototype Design for Building-Integrated Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Tobias Mueller & Steven Gronau, 2023. "Fostering Macroeconomic Research on Hydrogen-Powered Aviation: A Systematic Literature Review on General Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-33, February.
    14. Woo-Cheol Jeong & Da-Han Lee & Jae Hyung Roh & Jong-Bae Park, 2022. "Scenario Analysis of the GHG Emissions in the Electricity Sector through 2030 in South Korea Considering Updated NDC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-12, May.
    15. Ahmad Amiruddin & Roger Dargaville & Ross Gawler, 2024. "Optimal Integration of Renewable Energy, Energy Storage, and Indonesia’s Super Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-29, October.
    16. Waqar Muhammad Ashraf & Ghulam Moeen Uddin & Muhammad Farooq & Fahid Riaz & Hassan Afroze Ahmad & Ahmad Hassan Kamal & Saqib Anwar & Ahmed M. El-Sherbeeny & Muhammad Haider Khan & Noman Hafeez & Arman, 2021. "Construction of Operational Data-Driven Power Curve of a Generator by Industry 4.0 Data Analytics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Zhu, Xiaoxun & Chen, Yao & Xu, Shinai & Zhang, Shaohai & Gao, Xiaoxia & Sun, Haiying & Wang, Yu & Zhao, Fei & Lv, Tiancheng, 2023. "Three-dimensional non-uniform full wake characteristics for yawed wind turbine with LiDAR-based experimental verification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    18. Mark Kipngetich Kiptoo & Oludamilare Bode Adewuyi & Harun Or Rashid Howlader & Akito Nakadomari & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2023. "Optimal Capacity and Operational Planning for Renewable Energy-Based Microgrid Considering Different Demand-Side Management Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Abdulkadir Atalan, 2023. "Forecasting drinking milk price based on economic, social, and environmental factors using machine learning algorithms," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 214-241, January.
    20. Baxter Williams & Daniel Bishop & Patricio Gallardo & J. Geoffrey Chase, 2023. "Demand Side Management in Industrial, Commercial, and Residential Sectors: A Review of Constraints and Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-28, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6381-:d:1546971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.