IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i11p4396-d1159001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Plant Residues as Potential Co-Substrates for Biogas Production

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Frankowski

    (Department of Bioeconomy, Institute of Natural Fibers and Medicinal Plants—National Research Institute, Wojska Polskiego 71B, 60-630 Poznań, Poland)

  • Wojciech Czekała

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Plant biomass can be used in many directions for bioenergy production. Biogas can be produced from a most diverse group of substrates compared to liquid or solid biofuels. The choice of substrates and technologies is crucial because it will allow getting the expected results. Not without significance is also the price and availability of substrates. Therefore, waste and residues are increasingly being used. Accordingly, the aim of the review was to analyze the potential of biogas production from agricultural plant residues and the effectiveness of using this feedstock as a co-substrate in anaerobic digestion. In this article, selected agricultural plant residues are collected, and their advantages and disadvantages as substrates for biogas production are described. Moreover, the effective technology of biogas production by anaerobic digestion on an industrial scale and calculations to obtain biogas and methane efficiency of the substrates are also included. In addition, the summarized biogas efficiency of selected plant agricultural waste under mesophilic conditions studied by many researchers is shown. On the basis of the analyzed results of this research, it can be concluded that agricultural plant residues have great potential as co-substrates for biogas production. It is important to experimentally determine both the biogas and the methane efficiency of the substrate, representing a potential raw material for the production of gaseous biofuels. The use of artificial neural networks in the prediction of biogas emission is future-proof and should facilitate the management of biogas plants. The use of waste from the cultivation and processing of plant raw materials will not only help to manage this waste rationally, but also contribute to the increase in production of renewable energy sources. Accordingly, the circular economy in terms of the management of agricultural plant residues to produce biogas will have a multi-faceted, positive impact on the environment. On the basis of this review, it can be concluded that numerous agricultural plant residues can be used as potential co-substrates for biogas production.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Frankowski & Wojciech Czekała, 2023. "Agricultural Plant Residues as Potential Co-Substrates for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4396-:d:1159001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4396/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4396/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana Kodba & Tomislav Pukšec & Neven Duić, 2023. "Analysis of Specific Greenhouse Gas Emissions Savings from Biogas Production Based on Agricultural Residues and Industrial By-Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Masnadi, Mohammad S. & Grace, John R. & Bi, Xiaotao T. & Lim, C. Jim & Ellis, Naoko, 2015. "From fossil fuels towards renewables: Inhibitory and catalytic effects on carbon thermochemical conversion during co-gasification of biomass with fossil fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 196-209.
    3. Paul E. Brockway & Anne Owen & Lina I. Brand-Correa & Lukas Hardt, 2019. "Estimation of global final-stage energy-return-on-investment for fossil fuels with comparison to renewable energy sources," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 612-621, July.
    4. Siva Krishna Reddy Dwarshala & Siva Subramaniam Rajakumar & Obula Reddy Kummitha & Elumalai Perumal Venkatesan & Ibham Veza & Olusegun David Samuel, 2023. "A Review on Recent Developments of RCCI Engines Operated with Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Cieślik, Marta & Dach, Jacek & Lewicki, Andrzej & Smurzyńska, Anna & Janczak, Damian & Pawlicka-Kaczorowska, Joanna & Boniecki, Piotr & Cyplik, Paweł & Czekała, Wojciech & Jóźwiakowski, Krzysztof, 2016. "Methane fermentation of the maize straw silage under meso- and thermophilic conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P2), pages 1495-1502.
    6. Krzysztof Pilarski & Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Piotr Boniecki & Gniewko Niedbała & Karol Durczak & Kamil Witaszek & Natalia Mioduszewska & Ireneusz Kowalik, 2020. "The Efficiency of Industrial and Laboratory Anaerobic Digesters of Organic Substrates: The Use of the Biochemical Methane Potential Correction Coefficient," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Dach, Jacek & Boniecki, Piotr & Przybył, Jacek & Janczak, Damian & Lewicki, Andrzej & Czekała, Wojciech & Witaszek, Kamil & Rodríguez Carmona, Pablo César & Cieślik, Marta, 2014. "Energetic efficiency analysis of the agricultural biogas plant in 250kWe experimental installation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 34-38.
    8. Jakub Frankowski & Maciej Zaborowicz & Jacek Dach & Wojciech Czekała & Jacek Przybył, 2020. "Biological Waste Management in the Case of a Pandemic Emergency and Other Natural Disasters. Determination of Bioenergy Production from Floricultural Waste and Modeling of Methane Production Using Dee," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Anna Jasińska & Anna Grosser & Erik Meers, 2023. "Possibilities and Limitations of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Animal Manure—A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, May.
    10. Sukamal Sarkar & Milan Skalicky & Akbar Hossain & Marian Brestic & Saikat Saha & Sourav Garai & Krishnendu Ray & Koushik Brahmachari, 2020. "Management of Crop Residues for Improving Input Use Efficiency and Agricultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ephodia Sihlangu & Dibungi Luseba & Thierry Regnier & Primrose Magama & Idan Chiyanzu & Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe, 2024. "Investigating Methane, Carbon Dioxide, Ammonia, and Hydrogen Sulphide Content in Agricultural Waste during Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jakub Frankowski & Maciej Zaborowicz & Jacek Dach & Wojciech Czekała & Jacek Przybył, 2020. "Biological Waste Management in the Case of a Pandemic Emergency and Other Natural Disasters. Determination of Bioenergy Production from Floricultural Waste and Modeling of Methane Production Using Dee," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Jakub Mazurkiewicz, 2022. "Analysis of the Energy and Material Use of Manure as a Fertilizer or Substrate for Biogas Production during the Energy Crisis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Wojcieszak, Dawid & Przybył, Jacek & Myczko, Renata & Myczko, Andrzej, 2018. "Technological and energetic evaluation of maize stover silage for methane production on technical scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 903-912.
    4. Patrycja Pochwatka & Alina Kowalczyk-Juśko & Piotr Sołowiej & Agnieszka Wawrzyniak & Jacek Dach, 2020. "Biogas Plant Exploitation in a Middle-Sized Dairy Farm in Poland: Energetic and Economic Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Wojcieszak, Dawid & Przybył, Jacek & Ratajczak, Izabela & Goliński, Piotr & Janczak, Damian & Waśkiewicz, Agnieszka & Szentner, Kinga & Woźniak, Magdalena, 2020. "Chemical composition of maize stover fraction versus methane yield and energy value in fermentation process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Melkie Getnet Tadesse & Esubalew Kasaw & Biruk Fentahun & Emil Loghin & Jörn Felix Lübben, 2022. "Banana Peel and Conductive Polymers-Based Flexible Supercapacitors for Energy Harvesting and Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Rahul Kadam & Sangyeol Jo & Jonghwa Lee & Kamonwan Khanthong & Heewon Jang & Jungyu Park, 2024. "A Review on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Livestock Manures in the Context of Sustainable Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    8. Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Singh, Sanjeet & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Apostu, Simona-Andreea & Bansal, Pooja, 2023. "Overcoming the shock of energy depletion for energy policy? Tracing the missing link between energy depletion, renewable energy development and decarbonization in the USA," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Czekała, Wojciech & Łukomska, Aleksandra & Pulka, Jakub & Bojarski, Wiktor & Pochwatka, Patrycja & Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Oniszczuk, Anna & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "Waste-to-energy: Biogas potential of waste from coffee production and consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    10. Zeke Marshall & Paul E. Brockway, 2020. "A Net Energy Analysis of the Global Agriculture, Aquaculture, Fishing and Forestry System," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, June.
    11. Sun, Minmin & Zhang, Jianliang & Li, Kejiang & Barati, Mansoor & Liu, Zhibin, 2022. "Co-gasification characteristics of coke blended with hydro-char and pyro-char from bamboo," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    12. Jonathan Dumas & Antoine Dubois & Paolo Thiran & Pierre Jacques & Francesco Contino & Bertrand Cornélusse & Gauthier Limpens, 2022. "The Energy Return on Investment of Whole-Energy Systems: Application to Belgium," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 1-34, December.
    13. Obianuju Patience Ilo & Mulala Danny Simatele & S’phumelele Lucky Nkomo & Ntandoyenkosi Malusi Mkhize & Nagendra Gopinath Prabhu, 2021. "Methodological Approaches to Optimising Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth for Energy Efficiency in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Abdul Waheed & Chuang Li & Murad Muhammad & Mushtaq Ahmad & Khalid Ali Khan & Hamed A. Ghramh & Zhongwei Wang & Daoyuan Zhang, 2023. "Sustainable Potato Growth under Straw Mulching Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Tostes, Bernardo & Henriques, Sofia T. & Brockway, Paul E. & Heun, Matthew Kuperus & Domingos, Tiago & Sousa, Tânia, 2024. "On the right track? Energy use, carbon emissions, and intensities of world rail transportation, 1840–2020," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    16. Charles Guay-Boutet, 2023. "Estimating the Disaggregated Standard EROI of Canadian Oil Sands Extracted via Open-pit Mining, 1997–2016," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Jeong, Saerok, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of the hydrogen economy using multi-criteria decision-making analysis in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 485-492.
    18. Yang, Wei-Wei & Tang, Xin-Yuan & Ma, Xu & Li, Jia-Chen & Xu, Chao & He, Ya-Ling, 2023. "Rapid prediction, optimization and design of solar membrane reactor by data-driven surrogate model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    19. Masnadi, Mohammad S. & Grace, John R. & Bi, Xiaotao T. & Lim, C. Jim & Ellis, Naoko & Li, Yong Hua & Watkinson, A. Paul, 2015. "From coal towards renewables: Catalytic/synergistic effects during steam co-gasification of switchgrass and coal in a pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 918-930.
    20. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Tomasz Kulupa & Adrianna Kubiak & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Krzysztof Pilarski & Alicja Niewiadomska, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste—A Short Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4396-:d:1159001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.