IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i5p1797-d761059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power Generation Performance Indicators of Wind Farms Including the Influence of Wind Energy Resource Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Yanhui Qiao

    (State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources (NCEPU), School of New Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yongqian Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources (NCEPU), School of New Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yang Chen

    (State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources (NCEPU), School of New Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shuang Han

    (State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources (NCEPU), School of New Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Luo Wang

    (China Three Gorges Corporation, Beijing 100038, China)

Abstract

The accurate evaluation and fair comparison of wind farms power generation performance is of great significance to the technical transformation and operation and maintenance management of wind farms. However, problems exist in the evaluation indicator systems such as confusion, coupling and broadness, and the influence of wind energy resource differences not being able to be effectively eliminated, which makes it difficult to achieve the fair comparison of power generation performance among different wind farms. Thus, the evaluation indicator system and comprehensive evaluation method of wind farm power generation performance, including the influence of wind energy resource differences, are proposed in this paper to address the problems above, to which some new concepts such as resource conditions, ideal performance, reachable performance, actual performance, and performance loss are introduced in the proposed indicator system; the combination of statistical and comparative indicators are adopted to realize the quantitative evaluation, indicator decoupling, fair comparison, and loss attribution of wind farm power generation performance. The proposed comprehensive evaluation method is based on improved CRITIC (Criteria Importance though Intercrieria Correlation) weighting method, in which the uneven situation of different evaluation indicators and the comprehensive comparison of power generation performance among different wind farms shall be overcome and realized. Several sets of data from Chinese wind farms in service are used to validate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed method by taking the comprehensive evaluation models based on CRITIC weighting method and entropy weighting method as the benchmarks. The results demonstrated that the proposed evaluation indicator system works in the quantitative evaluation and fair comparison of wind farm design, operation, and maintenance and traces the source of power generation performance loss. In addition, the results of the proposed comprehensive evaluation model are more in line with the actual power generation performance of wind farms and can be applied to the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of power generation performance of different wind farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanhui Qiao & Yongqian Liu & Yang Chen & Shuang Han & Luo Wang, 2022. "Power Generation Performance Indicators of Wind Farms Including the Influence of Wind Energy Resource Differences," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1797-:d:761059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1797/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1797/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Meng & Niu, Dongxiao, 2019. "Research on project post-evaluation of wind power based on improved ANP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of trapezoid subordinate function improved by interval number," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 255-265.
    2. Niu, Briana & Hwangbo, Hoon & Zeng, Li & Ding, Yu, 2018. "Evaluation of alternative power production efficiency metrics for offshore wind turbines and farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 81-90.
    3. Yan, Jie & Zhang, Hao & Liu, Yongqian & Han, Shuang & Li, Li, 2019. "Uncertainty estimation for wind energy conversion by probabilistic wind turbine power curve modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1356-1370.
    4. Dongheon Shin & Kyungnam Ko, 2019. "Application of the Nacelle Transfer Function by a Nacelle-Mounted Light Detection and Ranging System to Wind Turbine Power Performance Measurement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Sebastian Pfaffel & Stefan Faulstich & Kurt Rohrig, 2017. "Performance and Reliability of Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Han, Shuang & Qiao, Yanhui & Yan, Ping & Yan, Jie & Liu, Yongqian & Li, Li, 2020. "Wind turbine power curve modeling based on interval extreme probability density for the integration of renewable energies and electric vehicles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 190-203.
    7. Liu, Yongqian & Qiao, Yanhui & Han, Shuang & Tao, Tao & Yan, Jie & Li, Li & Bekhbat, Galsan & Munkhtuya, Erdenebat, 2021. "Rotor equivalent wind speed calculation method based on equivalent power considering wind shear and tower shadow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 882-896.
    8. Yongqian Liu & Yanhui Qiao & Shuang Han & Yanping Xu & Tianxiang Geng & Tiandong Ma, 2021. "Quantitative Evaluation Methods of Cluster Wind Power Output Volatility and Source-Load Timing Matching in Regional Power Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Aldersey-Williams, John & Broadbent, Ian D. & Strachan, Peter A., 2020. "Analysis of United Kingdom offshore wind farm performance using public data: Improving the evidence base for policymaking," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peizhao Hong & Zhijun Qin, 2022. "Distributed Active Power Optimal Dispatching of Wind Farm Cluster Considering Wind Power Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Meng, Qingwei & Sun, Hao & Fang, Fang, 2023. "Stochastic performance evaluation method of wind power DC bus voltage control system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiao, Yanhui & Han, Shuang & Zhang, Yajie & Liu, Yongqian & Yan, Jie, 2024. "A multivariable wind turbine power curve modeling method considering segment control differences and short-time self-dependence," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Francisco Bilendo & Angela Meyer & Hamed Badihi & Ningyun Lu & Philippe Cambron & Bin Jiang, 2022. "Applications and Modeling Techniques of Wind Turbine Power Curve for Wind Farms—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-38, December.
    3. Wang, Peng & Li, Yanting & Zhang, Guangyao, 2023. "Probabilistic power curve estimation based on meteorological factors and density LSTM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    4. Zou, Runmin & Yang, Jiaxin & Wang, Yun & Liu, Fang & Essaaidi, Mohamed & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2021. "Wind turbine power curve modeling using an asymmetric error characteristic-based loss function and a hybrid intelligent optimizer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    5. Yan, Jie & Nuertayi, Akejiang & Yan, Yamin & Liu, Shan & Liu, Yongqian, 2023. "Hybrid physical and data driven modeling for dynamic operation characteristic simulation of wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Tao, Tao & Liu, Yongqian & Qiao, Yanhui & Gao, Linyue & Lu, Jiaoyang & Zhang, Ce & Wang, Yu, 2021. "Wind turbine blade icing diagnosis using hybrid features and Stacked-XGBoost algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1004-1013.
    7. Pengfei Zhang & Zuoxia Xing & Shanshan Guo & Mingyang Chen & Qingqi Zhao, 2022. "A New Wind Turbine Power Performance Assessment Approach: SCADA to Power Model Based with Regression-Kriging," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Xu, Keyi & Yan, Jie & Zhang, Hao & Zhang, Haoran & Han, Shuang & Liu, Yongqian, 2021. "Quantile based probabilistic wind turbine power curve model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    9. Kumarasamy Palanimuthu & Ganesh Mayilsamy & Ameerkhan Abdul Basheer & Seong-Ryong Lee & Dongran Song & Young Hoon Joo, 2022. "A Review of Recent Aerodynamic Power Extraction Challenges in Coordinated Pitch, Yaw, and Torque Control of Large-Scale Wind Turbine Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-27, November.
    10. Shin, Dongheon & Ko, Kyungnam, 2022. "Experimental study on application of nacelle-mounted LiDAR for analyzing wind turbine wake effects by distance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    11. Ding, Yu & Kumar, Nitesh & Prakash, Abhinav & Kio, Adaiyibo E. & Liu, Xin & Liu, Lei & Li, Qingchang, 2021. "A case study of space-time performance comparison of wind turbines on a wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 735-746.
    12. Yang Hu & Yilin Qiao & Jingchun Chu & Ling Yuan & Lei Pan, 2019. "Joint Point-Interval Prediction and Optimization of Wind Power Considering the Sequential Uncertainties of Stepwise Procedure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Stetco, Adrian & Dinmohammadi, Fateme & Zhao, Xingyu & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Barnes, Mike & Keane, John & Nenadic, Goran, 2019. "Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 620-635.
    14. Huijia Yang & Weiguang Fan & Guangyu Qin & Zhenyu Zhao, 2021. "A Fuzzy-ANP Approach for Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Grid-Side Commercial Storage Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Mohsen Vahidzadeh & Corey D. Markfort, 2019. "Modified Power Curves for Prediction of Power Output of Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Moreno, Sinvaldo Rodrigues & Seman, Laio Oriel & Stefenon, Stefano Frizzo & Coelho, Leandro dos Santos & Mariani, Viviana Cocco, 2024. "Enhancing wind speed forecasting through synergy of machine learning, singular spectral analysis, and variational mode decomposition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    17. Xiaodong Wang & Yunong Liu & Luyao Wang & Lin Ding & Hui Hu, 2019. "Numerical Study of Nacelle Wind Speed Characteristics of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine under Time-Varying Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Hu, Yang & Xi, Yunhua & Pan, Chenyang & Li, Gengda & Chen, Baowei, 2020. "Daily condition monitoring of grid-connected wind turbine via high-fidelity power curve and its comprehensive rating," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2095-2111.
    19. Athanasios Zisos & Georgia-Konstantina Sakki & Andreas Efstratiadis, 2023. "Mixing Renewable Energy with Pumped Hydropower Storage: Design Optimization under Uncertainty and Other Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Konstantinos Mira & Francesca Bugiotti & Tatiana Morosuk, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Energy Conversion and Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-36, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1797-:d:761059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.