IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p1172-d742505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Game Theory Approach Using the TLBO Algorithm for Generation Expansion Planning by Applying Carbon Curtailment Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Hamed Jalalzad Mahvizani

    (Department of Engineering, Sardar Jangal University, Gilan 4193165-151, Iran)

  • Hossein Yektamoghadam

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 196976-4499, Iran)

  • Rouzbeh Haghighi

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran 159163-4311, Iran)

  • Majid Dehghani

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran 159163-4311, Iran)

  • Amirhossein Nikoofard

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 196976-4499, Iran)

  • Mahdi Khosravy

    (Cross Labs, Cross-Compass Ltd., Tokyo 104-0045, Japan)

  • Tomonobu Senjyu

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan)

Abstract

In the present climate, due to the cost of investments, pollutants of fossil fuel, and global warming, it seems rational to accept numerous potential benefits of optimal generation expansion planning. Generation expansion planning by regarding these goals and providing the best plan for the future of the power plants reinforces the idea that plants are capable of generating electricity in environmentally friendly circumstances, particularly by reducing greenhouse gas production. This paper has applied a teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm to provide an optimal strategy for power plants and the proposed algorithm has been compared with other optimization methods. Then the game theory approach is implemented to make a competitive situation among power plants. A combined algorithm has been developed to reach the Nash equilibrium point. Moreover, the government role has been considered in order to reduce carbon emission and achieve the green earth policies. Three scenarios have been regarded to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed method. Finally, sensitivity analysis has been applied, and then the simulation results have been discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Hamed Jalalzad Mahvizani & Hossein Yektamoghadam & Rouzbeh Haghighi & Majid Dehghani & Amirhossein Nikoofard & Mahdi Khosravy & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2022. "A Game Theory Approach Using the TLBO Algorithm for Generation Expansion Planning by Applying Carbon Curtailment Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1172-:d:742505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qingtao Li & Jianxue Wang & Yao Zhang & Yue Fan & Guojun Bao & Xuebin Wang, 2020. "Multi-Period Generation Expansion Planning for Sustainable Power Systems to Maximize the Utilization of Renewable Energy Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z. & Fleming, Peter J., 2019. "A multi-objective framework for long-term generation expansion planning with variable renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Heejung Park, 2020. "Generation Capacity Expansion Planning Considering Hourly Dynamics of Renewable Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Radhanon Diewvilai & Kulyos Audomvongseree, 2021. "Generation Expansion Planning with Energy Storage Systems Considering Renewable Energy Generation Profiles and Full-Year Hourly Power Balance Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Vrionis, Constantinos & Tsalavoutis, Vasilios & Tolis, Athanasios, 2020. "A Generation Expansion Planning model for integrating high shares of renewable energy: A Meta-Model Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Victor H. Hinojosa & Joaquín Sepúlveda, 2020. "Solving the Stochastic Generation and Transmission Capacity Planning Problem Applied to Large-Scale Power Systems Using Generalized Shift-Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Nguyen, Hieu T. & Felder, Frank A., 2020. "Generation expansion planning with renewable energy credit markets: A bilevel programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    8. Li, Can & Conejo, Antonio J. & Liu, Peng & Omell, Benjamin P. & Siirola, John D. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2022. "Mixed-integer linear programming models and algorithms for generation and transmission expansion planning of power systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1071-1082.
    9. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S., 2018. "State-of-the-art generation expansion planning: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 563-589.
    10. Woong Ko & Jinho Kim, 2019. "Generation Expansion Planning Model for Integrated Energy System Considering Feasible Operation Region and Generation Efficiency of Combined Heat and Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Dagoumas, Athanasios S. & Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E., 2019. "Review of models for integrating renewable energy in the generation expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1573-1587.
    12. Carol Horton Tremblay & Victor J. Tremblay, 2019. "Oligopoly Games And The Cournot–Bertrand Model: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 1555-1577, December.
    13. Xiangyu Kong & Jingtao Yao & Zhijun E & Xin Wang, 2019. "Generation Expansion Planning Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network Considering the Uncertainty of Renewable Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Kim, Dowon & Ryu, Heelang & Lee, Jiwoong & Kim, Kyoung-Kuk, 2022. "Balancing risk: Generation expansion planning under climate mitigation scenarios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 665-679.
    15. Majid Dehghani & Mohammad Taghipour & Saleh Sadeghi Gougheri & Amirhossein Nikoofard & Gevork B. Gharehpetian & Mahdi Khosravy, 2021. "A Deep Learning-Based Approach for Generation Expansion Planning Considering Power Plants Lifetime," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shahenda Sarhan & Abdullah Shaheen & Ragab El-Sehiemy & Mona Gafar, 2022. "A Multi-Objective Teaching–Learning Studying-Based Algorithm for Large-Scale Dispatching of Combined Electrical Power and Heat Energies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Shahenda Sarhan & Abdullah M. Shaheen & Ragab A. El-Sehiemy & Mona Gafar, 2022. "Enhanced Teaching Learning-Based Algorithm for Fuel Costs and Losses Minimization in AC-DC Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moradi-Sepahvand, Mojtaba & Amraee, Turaj, 2021. "Integrated expansion planning of electric energy generation, transmission, and storage for handling high shares of wind and solar power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Majid Dehghani & Mohammad Taghipour & Saleh Sadeghi Gougheri & Amirhossein Nikoofard & Gevork B. Gharehpetian & Mahdi Khosravy, 2021. "A Deep Learning-Based Approach for Generation Expansion Planning Considering Power Plants Lifetime," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Zhang, Huaiyuan & Liao, Kai & Yang, Jianwei & Zheng, Shunwei & He, Zhengyou, 2024. "Frequency-constrained expansion planning for wind and photovoltaic power in wind-photovoltaic-hydro-thermal multi-power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    4. Constantino Dário Justo & José Eduardo Tafula & Pedro Moura, 2022. "Planning Sustainable Energy Systems in the Southern African Development Community: A Review of Power Systems Planning Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Radhanon Diewvilai & Kulyos Audomvongseree, 2022. "Optimal Loss of Load Expectation for Generation Expansion Planning Considering Fuel Unavailability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Khorramfar, Rahman & Mallapragada, Dharik & Amin, Saurabh, 2024. "Electric-gas infrastructure planning for deep decarbonization of energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 354(PA).
    7. Yeganefar, Ali & Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza & Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad Kazem, 2020. "Improvement of representative days selection in power system planning by incorporating the extreme days of the net load to take account of the variability and intermittency of renewable resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    8. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. K, Karunanithi & S, Ramesh & Raja, S.P. & Rowlo, Pranav Kumar, 2024. "Generation Expansion Planning considering environmental impact and sustainable development for an Indian state using the LEAP platform," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. Zhou, Yuzhou & Zhai, Qiaozhu & Yuan, Wei & Wu, Jiang, 2021. "Capacity expansion planning for wind power and energy storage considering hourly robust transmission constrained unit commitment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    11. Farrokhifar, Meisam & Nie, Yinghui & Pozo, David, 2020. "Energy systems planning: A survey on models for integrated power and natural gas networks coordination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    12. Botor, Benjamin & Böcker, Benjamin & Kallabis, Thomas & Weber, Christoph, 2021. "Information shocks and profitability risks for power plant investments – impacts of policy instruments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Xiangyu Kong & Jingtao Yao & Zhijun E & Xin Wang, 2019. "Generation Expansion Planning Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network Considering the Uncertainty of Renewable Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Keller, Victor & English, Jeffrey & Fernandez, Julian & Wade, Cameron & Fowler, McKenzie & Scholtysik, Sven & Palmer-Wilson, Kevin & Donald, James & Robertson, Bryson & Wild, Peter & Crawford, Curran , 2019. "Electrification of road transportation with utility controlled charging: A case study for British Columbia with a 93% renewable electricity target," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula & Vaz, A. Ismael F., 2021. "A review of co-optimization approaches for operational and planning problems in the energy sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    16. van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Torralba-Díaz, Laura & Bußar, Christian, 2022. "Impacts of power sector model features on optimal capacity expansion: A comparative study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Nock, Destenie & Levin, Todd & Baker, Erin, 2020. "Changing the policy paradigm: A benefit maximization approach to electricity planning in developing countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    18. Pombo, Daniel Vázquez & Martinez-Rico, Jon & Marczinkowski, Hannah M., 2022. "Towards 100% renewable islands in 2040 via generation expansion planning: The case of São Vicente, Cape Verde," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    19. Wei, Zhinong & Yang, Li & Chen, Sheng & Ma, Zhoujun & Zang, Haixiang & Fei, Youdie, 2022. "A multi-stage planning model for transitioning to low-carbon integrated electric power and natural gas systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    20. Ihsan, Abbas & Brear, Michael J. & Jeppesen, Matthew, 2021. "Impact of operating uncertainty on the performance of distributed, hybrid, renewable power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1172-:d:742505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.