IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i17p6369-d903311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Water-in-Oil Emulsions Separation Using a Controlled Multi-Frequency Acoustic Field at an Operating Facility

Author

Listed:
  • Alexey Dengaev

    (Faculty of Oil and Gas Fields Development 1, National University of Oil and Gas, Gubkin University, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Vladimir Verbitsky

    (Faculty of Oil and Gas Fields Development 1, National University of Oil and Gas, Gubkin University, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Olga Eremenko

    (Faculty of Chemical Processing of Oil, Gas and Ecology, National University of Oil and Gas, Gubkin University, 460052 Orenburg, Russia)

  • Anna Novikova

    (Faculty of Oil and Gas Fields Development 1, National University of Oil and Gas, Gubkin University, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Andrey Getalov

    (NPO, LLC, Volna, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Boris Sargin

    (NPO, LLC, Volna, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Separation of water-in-oil emulsion is a significant part of the cost of oil production due to the use of expensive demulsifiers and additional heating of the emulsion by burning associated petroleum gas. The article discusses an acoustic method that enables the increasing of the rate of separation of the emulsion. In field conditions, tests were carried out in which the efficiency of separation in the acoustic field was determined depending on the temperature of the product, the concentration of the demulsifier, and the frequency and time of exposure to the emitter. The results obtained allow us to talk about a significant reduction in the consumption of demulsifiers, a decrease in the influence of temperature on the phase separation process and an increase in the efficiency of oil treatment at existing facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexey Dengaev & Vladimir Verbitsky & Olga Eremenko & Anna Novikova & Andrey Getalov & Boris Sargin, 2022. "Water-in-Oil Emulsions Separation Using a Controlled Multi-Frequency Acoustic Field at an Operating Facility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6369-:d:903311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6369/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6369/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Cui & Yanyu Cui, 2015. "Effects of Surface Wettability and Roughness on the Heat Transfer Performance of Fluid Flowing through Microchannels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Shahid Munir & Syed Sheraz Daood & Syed Zahoor Ul Hassan Rizvi & Muhammad Arif Butt, 2009. "Development of an Inclined Plate Extractor-Separator for Immiscible Liquids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Nathan Gagnon & Charles A.S. Hall & Lysle Brinker, 2009. "A Preliminary Investigation of Energy Return on Energy Investment for Global Oil and Gas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Pan-Sang Kang & Jong-Se Lim & Chun Huh, 2016. "Screening Criteria and Considerations of Offshore Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Changjun Li & Wenlong Jia & Xia Wu, 2012. "Temperature Prediction for High Pressure High Temperature Condensate Gas Flow Through Chokes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Peyman Bahrami & Farzan Sahari Moghaddam & Lesley A. James, 2022. "A Review of Proxy Modeling Highlighting Applications for Reservoir Engineering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-32, July.
    7. Kexi Liao & Quanke Yao & Xia Wu & Wenlong Jia, 2012. "A Numerical Corrosion Rate Prediction Method for Direct Assessment of Wet Gas Gathering Pipelines Internal Corrosion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Aly A. Hamouda & Omid Karoussi, 2008. "Effect of Temperature, Wettability and Relative Permeability on Oil Recovery from Oil-wet Chalk," Energies, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Vladimir Alvarado & Eduardo Manrique, 2010. "Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Update Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(9), pages 1-47, August.
    10. Rajinder Pal, 2014. "Exergy Destruction in Pipeline Flow of Surfactant-Stabilized Oil-in-Water Emulsions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Antonio Pavón-García & Abel Zúñiga-Moreno & Ricardo García-Morales & Hugo I. Pérez-López & Octavio Elizalde-Solis, 2022. "Methane Hydrate Behavior for Water–Oil Systems Containing CTAB and Synperonic PE/F127 Surfactants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    12. Yuanliang Liu & Yinan Qiu & Zhan Liu & Gang Lei, 2022. "Modeling and Analysis of the Flow Characteristics of Liquid Hydrogen in a Pipe Suffering from External Transient Impact," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, June.
    13. Peng Zhang & Qingbai Wu & Yuzhong Yang, 2013. "Characteristics of Methane Hydrate Formation in Artificial and Natural Media," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huoxin Luan & Zhaohui Zhou & Chongjun Xu & Lei Bai & Xiaoguang Wang & Lu Han & Qun Zhang & Gen Li, 2022. "Study on the Synergistic Effects between Petroleum Sulfonate and a Nonionic–Anionic Surfactant for Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Xiankang Xin & Yiqiang Li & Gaoming Yu & Weiying Wang & Zhongzhi Zhang & Maolin Zhang & Wenli Ke & Debin Kong & Keliu Wu & Zhangxin Chen, 2017. "Non-Newtonian Flow Characteristics of Heavy Oil in the Bohai Bay Oilfield: Experimental and Simulation Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Jonathan Dumas & Antoine Dubois & Paolo Thiran & Pierre Jacques & Francesco Contino & Bertrand Cornélusse & Gauthier Limpens, 2022. "The Energy Return on Investment of Whole-Energy Systems: Application to Belgium," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 1-34, December.
    4. Coughlin, Katie, 2012. "A mathematical analysis of full fuel cycle energy use," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 698-708.
    5. Pezzey, John C.V. & Burke, Paul J., 2014. "Towards a more inclusive and precautionary indicator of global sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 141-154.
    6. Murphy, David J. & Hall, Charles A.S., 2011. "Adjusting the economy to the new energy realities of the second half of the age of oil," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 67-71.
    7. Samin Raziperchikolaee & Ashwin Pasumarti & Srikanta Mishra, 2020. "The effect of natural fractures on CO2 storage performance and oil recovery from CO2 and WAG injection in an Appalachian basin reservoir," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 1098-1114, October.
    8. Jin, Lu & Hawthorne, Steven & Sorensen, James & Pekot, Lawrence & Kurz, Bethany & Smith, Steven & Heebink, Loreal & Herdegen, Volker & Bosshart, Nicholas & Torres, José & Dalkhaa, Chantsalmaa & Peters, 2017. "Advancing CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in unconventional oil play—Experimental studies on Bakken shales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 171-183.
    9. Jun Pu & Xuejie Qin & Feifei Gou & Wenchao Fang & Fengjie Peng & Runxi Wang & Zhaoli Guo, 2018. "Molecular Modeling of CO 2 and n -Octane in Solubility Process and α -Quartz Nanoslit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Jon Freise, 2011. "The EROI of Conventional Canadian Natural Gas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(11), pages 1-25, November.
    11. Lina I. Brand-Correa & Paul E. Brockway & Claire L. Copeland & Timothy J. Foxon & Anne Owen & Peter G. Taylor, 2017. "Developing an Input-Output Based Method to Estimate a National-Level Energy Return on Investment (EROI)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Arodudu, Oludunsin Tunrayo & Helming, Katharina & Voinov, Alexey & Wiggering, Hubert, 2017. "Integrating agronomic factors into energy efficiency assessment of agro-bioenergy production – A case study of ethanol and biogas production from maize feedstock," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 426-439.
    13. Heun, Matthew Kuperus & de Wit, Martin, 2012. "Energy return on (energy) invested (EROI), oil prices, and energy transitions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 147-158.
    14. Lovelace, R. & Beck, S.B.M. & Watson, M. & Wild, A., 2011. "Assessing the energy implications of replacing car trips with bicycle trips in Sheffield, UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 2075-2087, April.
    15. Welkenhuysen, Kris & Rupert, Jort & Compernolle, Tine & Ramirez, Andrea & Swennen, Rudy & Piessens, Kris, 2017. "Considering economic and geological uncertainty in the simulation of realistic investment decisions for CO2-EOR projects in the North Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 745-761.
    16. Elise Dupont & Marc Germain & Hervé Jeanmart, 2021. "Estimate of the Societal Energy Return on Investment (EROI)," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Oliver Loertscher & Pau S. Pujolas, 2024. "Canadian productivity growth: Stuck in the oil sands," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(2), pages 478-501, May.
    18. Marco Vittorio Ecclesia & João Santos & Paul E. Brockway & Tiago Domingos, 2022. "A Comprehensive Societal Energy Return on Investment Study of Portugal Reveals a Low but Stable Value," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Rui Dias & Paulo Alexandre & Nuno Teixeira & Mariana Chambino, 2023. "Clean Energy Stocks: Resilient Safe Havens in the Volatility of Dirty Cryptocurrencies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    20. Adedapo N. Awolayo & Hemanta K. Sarma & Long X. Nghiem, 2018. "Brine-Dependent Recovery Processes in Carbonate and Sandstone Petroleum Reservoirs: Review of Laboratory-Field Studies, Interfacial Mechanisms and Modeling Attempts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-66, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6369-:d:903311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.