IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i11p1698-d116423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-Newtonian Flow Characteristics of Heavy Oil in the Bohai Bay Oilfield: Experimental and Simulation Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Xiankang Xin

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Yiqiang Li

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Gaoming Yu

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China)

  • Weiying Wang

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China)

  • Zhongzhi Zhang

    (College of Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Maolin Zhang

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China)

  • Wenli Ke

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China)

  • Debin Kong

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Keliu Wu

    (Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Zhangxin Chen

    (Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

Abstract

In this paper, physical experiments and numerical simulations were applied to systematically investigate the non-Newtonian flow characteristics of heavy oil in porous media. Rheological experiments were carried out to determine the rheology of heavy oil. Threshold pressure gradient (TPG) measurement experiments performed by a new micro-flow method and flow experiments were conducted to study the effect of viscosity, permeability and mobility on the flow characteristics of heavy oil. An in-house developed novel simulator considering the non-Newtonian flow was designed based on the experimental investigations. The results from the physical experiments indicated that heavy oil was a Bingham fluid with non-Newtonian flow characteristics, and its viscosity-temperature relationship conformed to the Arrhenius equation. Its viscosity decreased with an increase in temperature and a decrease in asphaltene content. The TPG measurement experiments was impacted by the flow rate, and its critical flow rate was 0.003 mL/min. The TPG decreased as the viscosity decreased or the permeability increased and had a power-law relationship with mobility. In addition, the critical viscosity had a range of 42–54 mPa?s, above which the TPG existed for a given permeability. The validation of the designed simulator was positive and acceptable when compared to the simulation results run in ECLIPSE V2013.1 and Computer Modelling Group (CMG) V2012 software as well as when compared to the results obtained during physical experiments. The difference between 0.0005 and 0.0750 MPa/m in the TPG showed a decrease of 11.55% in the oil recovery based on the simulation results, which demonstrated the largely adverse impact the TPG had on heavy oil production.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiankang Xin & Yiqiang Li & Gaoming Yu & Weiying Wang & Zhongzhi Zhang & Maolin Zhang & Wenli Ke & Debin Kong & Keliu Wu & Zhangxin Chen, 2017. "Non-Newtonian Flow Characteristics of Heavy Oil in the Bohai Bay Oilfield: Experimental and Simulation Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:1698-:d:116423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/11/1698/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/11/1698/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teng Lu & Zhaomin Li & Yan Zhou, 2017. "Flow Behavior and Displacement Mechanisms of Nanoparticle Stabilized Foam Flooding for Enhanced Heavy Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Vladimir Alvarado & Eduardo Manrique, 2010. "Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Update Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(9), pages 1-47, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aidar Kadyirov & Julia Karaeva, 2019. "Ultrasonic and Heat Treatment of Crude Oils," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Olalekan Alade & Dhafer Al Shehri & Mohamed Mahmoud & Kyuro Sasaki, 2019. "Viscosity–Temperature–Pressure Relationship of Extra-Heavy Oil (Bitumen): Empirical Modelling versus Artificial Neural Network (ANN)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Weihua Sun & Zhiyi Yu & Wenwu Zhang, 2022. "Effect of Shear-Thinning Property on the Energy Performance and Flow Field of an Axial Flow Pump," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samin Raziperchikolaee & Ashwin Pasumarti & Srikanta Mishra, 2020. "The effect of natural fractures on CO2 storage performance and oil recovery from CO2 and WAG injection in an Appalachian basin reservoir," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 1098-1114, October.
    2. Jin, Lu & Hawthorne, Steven & Sorensen, James & Pekot, Lawrence & Kurz, Bethany & Smith, Steven & Heebink, Loreal & Herdegen, Volker & Bosshart, Nicholas & Torres, José & Dalkhaa, Chantsalmaa & Peters, 2017. "Advancing CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in unconventional oil play—Experimental studies on Bakken shales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 171-183.
    3. Welkenhuysen, Kris & Rupert, Jort & Compernolle, Tine & Ramirez, Andrea & Swennen, Rudy & Piessens, Kris, 2017. "Considering economic and geological uncertainty in the simulation of realistic investment decisions for CO2-EOR projects in the North Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 745-761.
    4. Rui Dias & Paulo Alexandre & Nuno Teixeira & Mariana Chambino, 2023. "Clean Energy Stocks: Resilient Safe Havens in the Volatility of Dirty Cryptocurrencies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Adedapo N. Awolayo & Hemanta K. Sarma & Long X. Nghiem, 2018. "Brine-Dependent Recovery Processes in Carbonate and Sandstone Petroleum Reservoirs: Review of Laboratory-Field Studies, Interfacial Mechanisms and Modeling Attempts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-66, November.
    6. Mattia Boscherini & Alba Storione & Matteo Minelli & Francesco Miccio & Ferruccio Doghieri, 2023. "New Perspectives on Catalytic Hydrogen Production by the Reforming, Partial Oxidation and Decomposition of Methane and Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-33, September.
    7. Amjed M. Hassan & Mohamed A. Mahmoud & Abdulaziz A. Al-Majed & Ayman R. Al-Nakhli & Mohammed A. Bataweel & Salaheldin Elkatatny, 2019. "Mitigation of Condensate Banking Using Thermochemical Treatment: Experimental and Analytical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, February.
    8. Michele Fioretti & Alessandro Iaria & Aljoscha Janssen & Robert K Perrons & Clément Mazet-Sonilhac, 2022. "Innovation Begets Innovation and Concentration: the Case of Upstream Oil & Gas in the North Sea," Working Papers hal-03791971, HAL.
    9. Wei Guo & Zhendong Wang & Youhong Sun & Xiaoshu Lü & Yuan Wang & Sunhua Deng & Qiang Li, 2020. "Effects of Packer Locations on Downhole Electric Heater Performance: Experimental Test and Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Laura Osma & Luis García & Romel Pérez & Carolina Barbosa & Jesús Botett & Jorge Sandoval & Eduardo Manrique, 2019. "Benefit–Cost and Energy Efficiency Index to Support the Screening of Hybrid Cyclic Steam Stimulation Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Sayed Ameenuddin Irfan & Afza Shafie & Noorhana Yahya & Nooraini Zainuddin, 2019. "Mathematical Modeling and Simulation of Nanoparticle-Assisted Enhanced Oil Recovery—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Bai, Mingxing & Zhang, Zhichao & Cui, Xiaona & Song, Kaoping, 2017. "Studies of injection parameters for chemical flooding in carbonate reservoirs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1464-1471.
    13. Simon P. Philbin, 2020. "Critical Analysis and Evaluation of the Technology Pathways for Carbon Capture and Utilization," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Chao Ma & Xingyu Liu & Longlong Xie & Yan Chen & Wendong Ren & Wen Gu & Minghua Zhang & Huili Zhou, 2021. "Synthesis and Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Amphiphilic Low Molecular Weight Polymer Viscosity Reducer for Heavy Oil Cold Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    15. Nanjun Lai & Xin Guo & Ning Zhou & Qian Xu, 2016. "Shear Resistance Properties of Modified Nano-SiO 2 /AA/AM Copolymer Oil Displacement Agent," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Nuria Novas & Alfredo Alcayde & Isabel Robalo & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro & Francisco G. Montoya, 2020. "Energies and Its Worldwide Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-41, December.
    17. Dong, Xiaohu & Liu, Huiqing & Chen, Zhangxin & Wu, Keliu & Lu, Ning & Zhang, Qichen, 2019. "Enhanced oil recovery techniques for heavy oil and oilsands reservoirs after steam injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1190-1211.
    18. Piotr Kasza & Marek Czupski & Klaudia Wilk & Mateusz Masłowski & Rafał Moska & Łukasz Leśniak, 2020. "Laboratory Testing of Novel Polyfraction Nanoemulsion for EOR Processes in Carbonate Formations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Bobo Zheng & Jiuping Xu, 2014. "Carbon Capture and Storage Development Trends from a Techno-Paradigm Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    20. Xiaofei Sun & Yanyu Zhang & Guangpeng Chen & Zhiyong Gai, 2017. "Application of Nanoparticles in Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Critical Review of Recent Progress," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-33, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:1698-:d:116423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.