IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p1177-d742859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Synergistic Effects between Petroleum Sulfonate and a Nonionic–Anionic Surfactant for Enhanced Oil Recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Huoxin Luan

    (Xinjiang Oilfield Research Institute of Experiment & Testing, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Zhaohui Zhou

    (State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Chongjun Xu

    (Xinjiang Oilfield Research Institute of Experiment & Testing, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Lei Bai

    (Xinjiang Oilfield Research Institute of Experiment & Testing, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Xiaoguang Wang

    (Xinjiang Oilfield Research Institute of Exploration & Development, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Lu Han

    (State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Qun Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Gen Li

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China)

Abstract

Nonionic–anionic surfactants are expected to be applied in chemical flooding due to their important properties such as ultralow IFT values, good salt tolerance, and no chromatographic separation in porous media. In this study, a new type of nonionic–anionic–hydrophobic group structure surfactant N, N-dihydroxyethylalkylamide carboxylate (EAMC) was synthesized. The synergistic effects between petroleum sulfonate (KPS) and EAMC in reducing interfacial tension (IFT) and emulsification properties were studied. The influences of salt, alkali and Ca 2+ on the IFTs of surfactant solutions were also investigated. One-dimensional core flooding experiments were used to characterize the enhanced oil recovery capability of the KPS and EAMC mixed system. The experimental results show that both EAMC and KPS have high interfacial activity and can reduce IFTs to about 0.01 mN/m order of magnitude against decane at optimized concentrations. The area occupied by the hydrophilic group of EAMC on the interface is smaller than that of its own hydrophobic group. The interfacial film formed by EAMC alone is relatively loose. The IFTs of KPS containing different structure petroleum sulfonates is affected by the difference in the adsorption rate of petroleum sulfonates on the interface, which shows that both the dynamic and equilibrium interfacial tensions can have the lowest values. However, the IFTs of the EAMC solutions against crude oil can be reduced to ultralow values because the mixed tight adsorption film is formed by EAMC and crude oil fraction molecules with synergistic effect. On the other hand, the KPS molecule has a hydrophobic part with large size and no synergism with crude oil fractions can be observed in the solutions containing only KPS. The combination of EAMC and KPS shows synergistic effect, namely ultralow IFT values, good emulsification properties, high alkali tolerance, and good salt and Ca 2+ tolerance during a wide percentage range of EAMC. The best formula of EAMC and KPS system can be applied for EOR after polymer flooding. The studies in this paper are helpful for the design and application of a chemical flooding formula with nonionic–anionic–hydrophobic group structure surfactants.

Suggested Citation

  • Huoxin Luan & Zhaohui Zhou & Chongjun Xu & Lei Bai & Xiaoguang Wang & Lu Han & Qun Zhang & Gen Li, 2022. "Study on the Synergistic Effects between Petroleum Sulfonate and a Nonionic–Anionic Surfactant for Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1177-:d:742859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1177/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1177/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olajire, Abass A., 2014. "Review of ASP EOR (alkaline surfactant polymer enhanced oil recovery) technology in the petroleum industry: Prospects and challenges," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 963-982.
    2. Aghil Moslemizadeh & Hossein Khayati & Mohammad Madani & Mehdi Ghasemi & Khalil Shahbazi & Sohrab Zendehboudi & Azza Hashim Abbas, 2021. "A Systematic Study to Assess Displacement Performance of a Naturally-Derived Surfactant in Flow Porous Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Vladimir Alvarado & Eduardo Manrique, 2010. "Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Update Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(9), pages 1-47, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Druetta, P. & Raffa, P. & Picchioni, F., 2019. "Chemical enhanced oil recovery and the role of chemical product design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Omid Mosalman Haghighi & Ghasem Zargar & Abbas Khaksar Manshad & Muhammad Ali & Mohammad Ali Takassi & Jagar A. Ali & Alireza Keshavarz, 2020. "Effect of Environment-Friendly Non-Ionic Surfactant on Interfacial Tension Reduction and Wettability Alteration; Implications for Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Xiankang Xin & Yiqiang Li & Gaoming Yu & Weiying Wang & Zhongzhi Zhang & Maolin Zhang & Wenli Ke & Debin Kong & Keliu Wu & Zhangxin Chen, 2017. "Non-Newtonian Flow Characteristics of Heavy Oil in the Bohai Bay Oilfield: Experimental and Simulation Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Samin Raziperchikolaee & Ashwin Pasumarti & Srikanta Mishra, 2020. "The effect of natural fractures on CO2 storage performance and oil recovery from CO2 and WAG injection in an Appalachian basin reservoir," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 1098-1114, October.
    5. Jin, Lu & Hawthorne, Steven & Sorensen, James & Pekot, Lawrence & Kurz, Bethany & Smith, Steven & Heebink, Loreal & Herdegen, Volker & Bosshart, Nicholas & Torres, José & Dalkhaa, Chantsalmaa & Peters, 2017. "Advancing CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in unconventional oil play—Experimental studies on Bakken shales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 171-183.
    6. Jun Pu & Xuejie Qin & Feifei Gou & Wenchao Fang & Fengjie Peng & Runxi Wang & Zhaoli Guo, 2018. "Molecular Modeling of CO 2 and n -Octane in Solubility Process and α -Quartz Nanoslit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-11, November.
    7. Hong He & Jingyu Fu & Baofeng Hou & Fuqing Yuan & Lanlei Guo & Zongyang Li & Qing You, 2018. "Investigation of Injection Strategy of Branched-Preformed Particle Gel/Polymer/Surfactant for Enhanced Oil Recovery after Polymer Flooding in Heterogeneous Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Welkenhuysen, Kris & Rupert, Jort & Compernolle, Tine & Ramirez, Andrea & Swennen, Rudy & Piessens, Kris, 2017. "Considering economic and geological uncertainty in the simulation of realistic investment decisions for CO2-EOR projects in the North Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 745-761.
    9. Huiying Zhong & Weidong Zhang & Jing Fu & Jun Lu & Hongjun Yin, 2017. "The Performance of Polymer Flooding in Heterogeneous Type II Reservoirs—An Experimental and Field Investigation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Rui Dias & Paulo Alexandre & Nuno Teixeira & Mariana Chambino, 2023. "Clean Energy Stocks: Resilient Safe Havens in the Volatility of Dirty Cryptocurrencies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    11. Adedapo N. Awolayo & Hemanta K. Sarma & Long X. Nghiem, 2018. "Brine-Dependent Recovery Processes in Carbonate and Sandstone Petroleum Reservoirs: Review of Laboratory-Field Studies, Interfacial Mechanisms and Modeling Attempts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-66, November.
    12. Mandadige Samintha Anne Perera & Ranjith Pathegama Gamage & Tharaka Dilanka Rathnaweera & Ashani Savinda Ranathunga & Andrew Koay & Xavier Choi, 2016. "A Review of CO 2 -Enhanced Oil Recovery with a Simulated Sensitivity Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Li, Yujie & Zhai, Cheng & Xu, Jizhao & Yu, Xu & Sun, Yong & Cong, Yuzhou & Tang, Wei & Zheng, Yangfeng, 2023. "Effects of steam treatment on the internal moisture and physicochemical structure of coal and their implications for coalbed methane recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    14. Mattia Boscherini & Alba Storione & Matteo Minelli & Francesco Miccio & Ferruccio Doghieri, 2023. "New Perspectives on Catalytic Hydrogen Production by the Reforming, Partial Oxidation and Decomposition of Methane and Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-33, September.
    15. Calderón, Andrés J. & Pekney, Natalie J., 2020. "Optimization of enhanced oil recovery operations in unconventional reservoirs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    16. Michele Fioretti & Alessandro Iaria & Aljoscha Janssen & Robert K Perrons & Clément Mazet-Sonilhac, 2022. "Innovation Begets Innovation and Concentration: the Case of Upstream Oil & Gas in the North Sea," SciencePo Working papers hal-03791971, HAL.
    17. Li, Jiawei & Yuan, Wanju & Zhang, Yin & Cherubini, Claudia & Scheuermann, Alexander & Galindo Torres, Sergio Andres & Li, Ling, 2020. "Numerical investigations of CO2 and N2 miscible flow as the working fluid in enhanced geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    18. Deli Jia & Jiqun Zhang & Yufei Sun & Suling Wang & Sheng Gao & Meixia Qiao & Yanchun Li & Ruyi Qu, 2023. "Collaboration between Oil Development and Water/Power Consumption in High-Water-Cut Oilfields," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    19. Amjed M. Hassan & Mohamed A. Mahmoud & Abdulaziz A. Al-Majed & Ayman R. Al-Nakhli & Mohammed A. Bataweel & Salaheldin Elkatatny, 2019. "Mitigation of Condensate Banking Using Thermochemical Treatment: Experimental and Analytical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, February.
    20. Laura Osma & Luis García & Romel Pérez & Carolina Barbosa & Jesús Botett & Jorge Sandoval & Eduardo Manrique, 2019. "Benefit–Cost and Energy Efficiency Index to Support the Screening of Hybrid Cyclic Steam Stimulation Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1177-:d:742859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.