IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v5y2012i10p3892-3907d20625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Numerical Corrosion Rate Prediction Method for Direct Assessment of Wet Gas Gathering Pipelines Internal Corrosion

Author

Listed:
  • Kexi Liao

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
    Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Quanke Yao

    (China Petroleum Engineering Co. Ltd., Southwest Company, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Xia Wu

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
    Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Wenlong Jia

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
    Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

Abstract

The paper introduces a numerical internal corrosion rate prediction method into the internal corrosion direct assessment (ICDA) process for wet gas gathering pipelines based on the back propagation (BP), the genetic algorithm (GA) and BP, and the particle swarm optimization and BP artificial neural networks (ANNs). The basic data were collected in accordance with the terms established by the National Association of Corrosion Engineers in the Wet Gas Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment (WG-ICDA) SP0110, and the corrosion influencing factors, which are the input variables of the ANN model, are identified and refined by the grey relational analysis method. A total of 116 groups of basic data and inspection data from seven gathering pipelines in Sichuan (China) are used to develop the numerical prediction model. Ninety-five of the 116 groups of data are selected to train the neural network. The remaining 21 groups of data are chosen to test the three ANNs. The test results show that the GA and BP ANN yield the smallest number of absolute errors and should be selected as the preferred model for the prediction of corrosion rates. The accuracy of the model was validated by another 54 groups of excavation data obtained from pipeline No. 8, whose internal environment parameters are similar to those found in the training and testing pipelines. The results show that the numerical method yields significantly better absolute errors than either the de Waard 95 model or the Top-of-Line corrosion model in WG-ICDA when applying the approach to specific pipelines, and it can be used to investigate a specific pipeline for which the data have been collected and the ANN has been developed in WG-ICDA SP0110.

Suggested Citation

  • Kexi Liao & Quanke Yao & Xia Wu & Wenlong Jia, 2012. "A Numerical Corrosion Rate Prediction Method for Direct Assessment of Wet Gas Gathering Pipelines Internal Corrosion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:5:y:2012:i:10:p:3892-3907:d:20625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/10/3892/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/10/3892/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Guoqiang & Eddy Patuwo, B. & Y. Hu, Michael, 1998. "Forecasting with artificial neural networks:: The state of the art," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 35-62, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miao, Xingyuan & Zhao, Hong, 2024. "Corroded submarine pipeline degradation prediction based on theory-guided IMOSOA-EL model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Alexey Dengaev & Vladimir Verbitsky & Olga Eremenko & Anna Novikova & Andrey Getalov & Boris Sargin, 2022. "Water-in-Oil Emulsions Separation Using a Controlled Multi-Frequency Acoustic Field at an Operating Facility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Kimiya Zakikhani & Fuzhan Nasiri & Tarek Zayed, 2021. "A failure prediction model for corrosion in gas transmission pipelines," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 374-390, June.
    4. María E. Arce & Ángeles Saavedra & José L. Míguez & Enrique Granada & Antón Cacabelos, 2013. "Biomass Fuel and Combustion Conditions Selection in a Fixed Bed Combustor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Li, Xinhong & Jia, Ruichao & Zhang, Renren & Yang, Shangyu & Chen, Guoming, 2022. "A KPCA-BRANN based data-driven approach to model corrosion degradation of subsea oil pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghiassi, M. & Saidane, H. & Zimbra, D.K., 2005. "A dynamic artificial neural network model for forecasting time series events," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 341-362.
    2. Barrow, Devon K., 2016. "Forecasting intraday call arrivals using the seasonal moving average method," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 6088-6096.
    3. Jani, D.B. & Mishra, Manish & Sahoo, P.K., 2017. "Application of artificial neural network for predicting performance of solid desiccant cooling systems – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 352-366.
    4. Nataša Glišović & Miloš Milenković & Nebojša Bojović & Libor Švadlenka & Zoran Avramović, 2016. "A hybrid model for forecasting the volume of passenger flows on Serbian railways," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 271-285, July.
    5. Christian Fieberg & Daniel Metko & Thorsten Poddig & Thomas Loy, 2023. "Machine learning techniques for cross-sectional equity returns’ prediction," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(1), pages 289-323, March.
    6. Szafranek, Karol, 2019. "Bagged neural networks for forecasting Polish (low) inflation," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1042-1059.
    7. Sangseop Lim & Chang-hee Lee & Won-Ju Lee & Junghwan Choi & Dongho Jung & Younghun Jeon, 2022. "Valuation of the Extension Option in Time Charter Contracts in the LNG Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Bontempi, Gianluca & Ben Taieb, Souhaib, 2011. "Conditionally dependent strategies for multiple-step-ahead prediction in local learning," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 689-699, July.
    9. Huber, Jakob & Stuckenschmidt, Heiner, 2020. "Daily retail demand forecasting using machine learning with emphasis on calendric special days," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1420-1438.
    10. Carlo Fezzi & Luca Mosetti, 2018. "Size matters: Estimation sample length and electricity price forecasting accuracy," DEM Working Papers 2018/10, Department of Economics and Management.
    11. Van Belle, Jente & Guns, Tias & Verbeke, Wouter, 2021. "Using shared sell-through data to forecast wholesaler demand in multi-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 466-479.
    12. Roman Matkovskyy & Taoufik Bouraoui, 2019. "Application of Neural Networks to Short Time Series Composite Indexes: Evidence from the Nonlinear Autoregressive with Exogenous Inputs (NARX) Model," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(2), pages 433-446, June.
    13. Ye, Yuan & Lu, Yonggang & Robinson, Powell & Narayanan, Arunachalam, 2022. "An empirical Bayes approach to incorporating demand intermittency and irregularity into inventory control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 255-272.
    14. CIOBANU Dumitru & BAR Mary Violeta, 2013. "On The Prediction Of Exchange Rate Dollar/Euro With An Svm Model," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 65(2), pages 91-109.
    15. Chenghao Zhong & Wengao Lou & Yongzeng Lai, 2023. "A Projection Pursuit Dynamic Cluster Model for Tourism Safety Early Warning and Its Implications for Sustainable Tourism," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Nastac, Iulian & Dobrescu, Emilian & Pelinescu, Elena, 2007. "Neuro-Adaptive Model for Financial Forecasting," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 4(3), pages 19-41, September.
    17. Joo, Rocío & Bertrand, Sophie & Chaigneau, Alexis & Ñiquen, Miguel, 2011. "Optimization of an artificial neural network for identifying fishing set positions from VMS data: An example from the Peruvian anchovy purse seine fishery," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 1048-1059.
    18. Gaspar, José F. & Calvário, Miguel & Kamarlouei, Mojtaba & Guedes Soares, C., 2016. "Power take-off concept for wave energy converters based on oil-hydraulic transformer units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1232-1246.
    19. Alejandro Parot & Kevin Michell & Werner D. Kristjanpoller, 2019. "Using Artificial Neural Networks to forecast Exchange Rate, including VAR‐VECM residual analysis and prediction linear combination," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 3-15, January.
    20. Yaren Aydın & Celal Cakiroglu & Gebrail Bekdaş & Ümit Işıkdağ & Sanghun Kim & Junhee Hong & Zong Woo Geem, 2023. "Neural Network Predictive Models for Alkali-Activated Concrete Carbon Emission Using Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:5:y:2012:i:10:p:3892-3907:d:20625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.