IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i10p3516-d813441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergetic Analysis of DME Synthesis from CO 2 and Renewable Hydrogen

Author

Listed:
  • Marcello De Falco

    (Unit of Process Engineering, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy)

  • Gianluca Natrella

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Navale, Elettrica, Elettronica e delle Telecomunicazioni—DITEN, University of Genoa, DITEN, Via all’Opera Pia 11A, 16145 Genoa, Italy)

  • Mauro Capocelli

    (Unit of Process Engineering, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy)

  • Paulina Popielak

    (Department of Advanced Energy Technologies, Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, Dabrowskiego 73, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland)

  • Marcelina Sołtysik

    (Department of Advanced Energy Technologies, Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, Dabrowskiego 73, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland)

  • Dariusz Wawrzyńczak

    (Department of Advanced Energy Technologies, Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, Dabrowskiego 73, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland)

  • Izabela Majchrzak-Kucęba

    (Department of Advanced Energy Technologies, Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, Dabrowskiego 73, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland)

Abstract

Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU) is a viable solution to valorise the CO 2 captured from industrial plants’ flue gas, thus avoiding emitting it and synthesizing products with high added value. On the other hand, using CO 2 as a reactant in chemical processes is a challenging task, and a rigorous analysis of the performance is needed to evaluate the real impact of CCU technologies in terms of efficiency and environmental footprint. In this paper, the energetic performance of a DME and methanol synthesis process fed by 25% of the CO 2 captured from a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant and by the green hydrogen produced through an electrolyser was evaluated. The remaining 75% of the CO 2 was compressed and stored underground. The process was assessed by means of an exergetic analysis and compared to post-combustion Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), where 100% of the CO 2 captured was stored underground. Through the exergy analysis, the quality degradation of energy was quantified, and the sources of irreversibility were detected. The carbon-emitting source was a 189 MW Brayton–Joule power plant, which was mainly responsible for exergy destruction. The CCU configuration showed a higher exergy efficiency than the CCS, but higher exergy destruction per non-emitted carbon dioxide. In the DME/methanol production plant, the main contribution to exergy destruction was given by the distillation column separating the reactor outlet stream and, in particular, the top-stage condenser was found to be the component with the highest irreversibility (45% of the total). Additionally, the methanol/DME synthesis reactor destroyed a significant amount of exergy (24%). Globally, DME/methanol synthesis from CO 2 and green hydrogen is feasible from an exergetic point of view, with 2.276 MJ of energy gained per 1 MJ of exergy destroyed.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcello De Falco & Gianluca Natrella & Mauro Capocelli & Paulina Popielak & Marcelina Sołtysik & Dariusz Wawrzyńczak & Izabela Majchrzak-Kucęba, 2022. "Exergetic Analysis of DME Synthesis from CO 2 and Renewable Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3516-:d:813441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3516/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3516/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Schöneberger, Jan C. & Boulamanti, Aikaterini & Tzimas, Evangelos, 2016. "Methanol synthesis using captured CO2 as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 718-732.
    2. Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Kvamsdal, Hanne M. & Bolland, Olav, 2005. "Exergy analysis of a gas-turbine combined-cycle power plant with precombustion CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 5-39.
    3. Blumberg, Timo & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2017. "Exergy-based evaluation of methanol production from natural gas with CO2 utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2528-2539.
    4. Baena-Moreno, Francisco M. & Gonzalez-Castaño, Miriam & Arellano-García, Harvey & Reina, T.R., 2021. "Exploring profitability of bioeconomy paths: Dimethyl ether from biogas as case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    5. Peter van Os, 2018. "Accelerating low carbon industrial growth through carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS)," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 994-997, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Facchino & Paulina Popielak & Marcin Panowski & Dariusz Wawrzyńczak & Izabela Majchrzak-Kucęba & Marcello De Falco, 2022. "The Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage on the Electricity Sector: A Life Cycle Assessment Comparison between Italy and Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Gao, Ruxing & Wang, Lei & Zhang, Leiyu & Zhang, Chundong & Jun, Ki-Won & Kim, Seok Ki & Zhao, Tiansheng & Wan, Hui & Guan, Guofeng & Zhu, Yuezhao, 2023. "A multi-criteria sustainability assessment and decision-making framework for DME synthesis via CO2 hydrogenation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Atsonios, Konstantinos & Li, Jun & Inglezakis, Vassilis J., 2023. "Process analysis and comparative assessment of advanced thermochemical pathways for e-kerosene production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    4. Forlin Bertel-Pérez & Grisel Cogollo-Cárcamo & Ángel Darío González-Delgado, 2023. "Assessing Exergy Efficiency in Computer-Aided Modeled Large-Scale Production of Chitosan Microbeads Modified with Thiourea and Magnetite Nanoparticles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yih-Hang Chen & David Shan-Hill Wong & Ya-Chien Chen & Chao-Min Chang & Hsuan Chang, 2019. "Design and Performance Comparison of Methanol Production Processes with Carbon Dioxide Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Mohammed Bin Afif & Abdulla Bin Afif & Harry Apostoleris & Krishiv Gandhi & Anup Dadlani & Amal Al Ghaferi & Jan Torgersen & Matteo Chiesa, 2022. "Ultra-Cheap Renewable Energy as an Enabling Technology for Deep Industrial Decarbonization via Capture and Utilization of Process CO 2 Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Wiesberg, Igor Lapenda & Brigagão, George Victor & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2019. "Carbon dioxide management via exergy-based sustainability assessment: Carbon Capture and Storage versus conversion to methanol," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 720-732.
    4. Kotowicz, Janusz & Węcel, Daniel & Brzęczek, Mateusz, 2021. "Analysis of the work of a “renewable” methanol production installation based ON H2 from electrolysis and CO2 from power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    5. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Techno-economic and climate impact analysis of carbon utilization process for methanol production from blast furnace gas over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Ma, Qian & Chang, Yuan & Yuan, Bo & Song, Zhaozheng & Xue, Jinjun & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2022. "Utilizing carbon dioxide from refinery flue gas for methanol production: System design and assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    7. Blumberg, Timo & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2019. "CO2-utilization in the synthesis of methanol: Potential analysis and exergetic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 730-744.
    8. Kotowicz, J. & Brzęczek, M., 2021. "Methods to increase the efficiency of production and purification installations of renewable methanol," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 568-583.
    9. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & González-Garay, Andrés & Bernardi, Andrea & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Pozo, Carlos & Dowell, Niall Mac & Chachuat, Benoit & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "Electricity grid decarbonisation or green methanol fuel? A life-cycle modelling and analysis of today′s transportation-power nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    10. Gitelman, Lazar & Kozhevnikov, Mikhail & Ditenberg, Maksim, 2024. "Electrification as a factor in replacing hydrocarbon fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    11. Olimpia Neagu, 2019. "The Link between Economic Complexity and Carbon Emissions in the European Union Countries: A Model Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    12. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    13. Li, Yan & Feng, Tian-tian & Liu, Li-li & Zhang, Meng-xi, 2023. "How do the electricity market and carbon market interact and achieve integrated development?--A bibliometric-based review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    14. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    15. Ziółkowski, Paweł & Stasiak, Kamil & Amiri, Milad & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2023. "Negative carbon dioxide gas power plant integrated with gasification of sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    16. Navarro, J.C. & Baena-Moreno, F.M. & Centeno, M.A. & Laguna, O.H. & Almagro, J.F. & Odriozola, J.A., 2023. "Process design and utilisation strategy for CO2 capture in flue gases. Technical assessment and preliminary economic approach for steel mills," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Shah, Vedant & Cheng, Zhuo & Baser, Deven S. & Fan, Jonathan A. & Fan, Liang-Shih, 2021. "Highly Selective Production of Syngas from Chemical Looping Reforming of Methane with CO2 Utilization on MgO-supported Calcium Ferrite Redox Materials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    18. Galusnyak, Stefan Cristian & Petrescu, Letitia & Chisalita, Dora Andreea & Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of methanol production and conversion into various chemical intermediates and products," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    19. Rahmat, Yoga & Maier, Simon & Moser, Francisco & Raab, Moritz & Hoffmann, Christian & Repke, Jens-Uwe & Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe, 2023. "Techno-economic and exergy analysis of e-methanol production under fixed operating conditions in Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    20. Crivellari, Anna & Cozzani, Valerio & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2019. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of novel methanol synthesis processes driven by offshore renewable energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3516-:d:813441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.