IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i7p1875-d526042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Catalytic Hot Gas Cleanup of Biomass Gasification Producer Gas via Steam Reforming Using Nickel-Supported Clay Minerals

Author

Listed:
  • Prashanth Reddy Buchireddy

    (Chemical Engineering Department, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA)

  • Devin Peck

    (Chemical Engineering Department, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA)

  • Mark Zappi

    (Chemical Engineering Department, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA)

  • Ray Mark Bricka

    (Dave C. Swalm School of Chemical Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

Abstract

Amongst the issues associated with the commercialization of biomass gasification, the presence of tars has been one of the most difficult aspects to address. Tars are an impurity generated from the gasifier and upon their condensation cause problems in downstream equipment including plugging, blockages, corrosion, and major catalyst deactivation. These problems lead to losses of efficiency as well as potential maintenance issues resulting from damaged processing units. Therefore, the removal of tars is necessary in order for the effective operation of a biomass gasification facility for the production of high-value fuel gas. The catalytic activity of montmorillonite and montmorillonite-supported nickel as tar removal catalysts will be investigated in this study. Ni-montmorillonite catalyst was prepared, characterized, and tested in a laboratory-scale reactor for its efficiency in reforming tars using naphthalene as a tar model compound. Efficacy of montmorillonite-supported nickel catalyst was tested as a function of nickel content, reaction temperature, steam-to-carbon ratio, and naphthalene loading. The results demonstrate that montmorillonite is catalytically active in removing naphthalene. Ni-montmorillonite had high activity towards naphthalene removal via steam reforming, with removal efficiencies greater than 99%. The activation energy was calculated for Ni-montmorillonite assuming first-order kinetics and was found to be 84.5 kJ/mole in accordance with the literature. Long-term activity tests were also conducted and showed that the catalyst was active with naphthalene removal efficiencies greater than 95% maintained over a 97-h test period. A little loss of activity was observed with a removal decrease from 97% to 95%. To investigate the decrease in catalytic activity, characterization of fresh and used catalyst samples was performed using thermogravimetric analysis, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and surface area analysis. The loss in activity was attributed to a decrease in catalyst surface area caused by nickel sintering and coke formation.

Suggested Citation

  • Prashanth Reddy Buchireddy & Devin Peck & Mark Zappi & Ray Mark Bricka, 2021. "Catalytic Hot Gas Cleanup of Biomass Gasification Producer Gas via Steam Reforming Using Nickel-Supported Clay Minerals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1875-:d:526042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1875/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1875/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Ekwurzel & J. Boneham & M. W. Dalton & R. Heede & R. J. Mera & M. R. Allen & P. C. Frumhoff, 2017. "The rise in global atmospheric CO2, surface temperature, and sea level from emissions traced to major carbon producers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(4), pages 579-590, October.
    2. Devi, Lopamudra & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Janssen, Frans J.J.G. & van Paasen, Sander V.B. & Bergman, Patrick C.A. & Kiel, Jacob H.A., 2005. "Catalytic decomposition of biomass tars: use of dolomite and untreated olivine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 565-587.
    3. Shen, Yafei & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2013. "Recent progresses in catalytic tar elimination during biomass gasification or pyrolysis—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 371-392.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinling Song & Chuyang Tang & Xinyuan An & Yi Wang & Shankun Zhou & Chunhong Huang, 2022. "Catalytic Pyrolysis of Sawdust with Desulfurized Fly Ash for Pyrolysis Gas Upgrading," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Marcin Pajak & Grzegorz Brus & Janusz S. Szmyd, 2021. "Catalyst Distribution Optimization Scheme for Effective Green Hydrogen Production from Biogas Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Mateusz Wnukowski & Wojciech Moroń, 2021. "Warm Plasma Application in Tar Conversion and Syngas Valorization: The Fate of Hydrogen Sulfide," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Jhulimar Castro & Jonathan Leaver & Shusheng Pang, 2022. "Simulation and Techno-Economic Assessment of Hydrogen Production from Biomass Gasification-Based Processes: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-37, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Ningbo & Salisu, Jamilu & Quan, Cui & Williams, Paul, 2021. "Modified nickel-based catalysts for improved steam reforming of biomass tar: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Guan, Guoqing & Kaewpanha, Malinee & Hao, Xiaogang & Abudula, Abuliti, 2016. "Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 450-461.
    3. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    4. Shahbaz, Muhammad & yusup, Suzana & Inayat, Abrar & Patrick, David Onoja & Ammar, Muhammad, 2017. "The influence of catalysts in biomass steam gasification and catalytic potential of coal bottom ash in biomass steam gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 468-476.
    5. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2017. "The fate of SOFC anodes under biomass producer gas contaminants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1050-1066.
    6. Bendoni, R. & Miccio, F. & Medri, V. & Benito, P. & Vaccari, A. & Landi, E., 2019. "Geopolymer composites for the catalytic cleaning of tar in biomass-derived gas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1107-1116.
    7. Se-Won Park & Sang-Yeop Lee & Yean-Ouk Jeong & Gun-Ho Han & Yong-Chil Seo, 2018. "Effects of Oxygen Enrichment in Air Oxidants on Biomass Gasification Efficiency and the Reduction of Tar Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Liu, Zhongzhe & Hughes, Matthew & Tong, Yiran & Zhou, Jizhi & Kreutter, William & Lopez, Hugo Cortes & Singer, Simcha & Zitomer, Daniel & McNamara, Patrick, 2022. "Paper mill sludge biochar to enhance energy recovery from pyrolysis: A comprehensive evaluation and comparison," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    9. Shen, Yafei, 2015. "Chars as carbonaceous adsorbents/catalysts for tar elimination during biomass pyrolysis or gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 281-295.
    10. Hu, Fu-Xiang & Yang, Guo-Hua & Ding, Guo-Zhu & Li, Zhen & Du, Ka-Shuai & Hu, Zhi-Fa & Tian, Su-Rui, 2016. "Experimental study on catalytic cracking of model tar compounds in a dual layer granular bed filter," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 47-57.
    11. Unyaphan, Siriwat & Tarnpradab, Thanyawan & Takahashi, Fumitake & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2017. "Improvement of tar removal performance of oil scrubber by producing syngas microbubbles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 802-812.
    12. Mauerhofer, A.M. & Schmid, J.C. & Benedikt, F. & Fuchs, J. & Müller, S. & Hofbauer, H., 2019. "Dual fluidized bed steam gasification: Change of product gas quality along the reactor height," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1256-1272.
    13. Ahmed, A.M.A & Salmiaton, A. & Choong, T.S.Y & Wan Azlina, W.A.K.G., 2015. "Review of kinetic and equilibrium concepts for biomass tar modeling by using Aspen Plus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1623-1644.
    14. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    15. Pan, Xuwei & Wu, Yan & Li, Tingzhen & Lan, Guoxin & Shen, Jia & Yu, Yue & Xue, Ping & Chen, Dan & Wang, Maoqing & Fu, Chuan, 2023. "A study of co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and rice husk for syngas production based on a cyclic catalytic integrated process system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Patrik Šuhaj & Jakub Husár & Juma Haydary, 2020. "Gasification of RDF and Its Components with Tire Pyrolysis Char as Tar-Cracking Catalyst," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Zhang, Shiyu & Bie, Xuan & Qian, Zheng & Wu, Mengna & Li, Kaile & Li, Qinghai & Zhang, Yanguo & Zhou, Hui, 2024. "Synergistic interactions between cellulose and plastics (PET, HDPE, and PS) during CO2 gasification-catalytic reforming on Ni/CeO2 nanorod catalyst," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    18. Berrueco, C. & Montané, D. & Matas Güell, B. & del Alamo, G., 2014. "Effect of temperature and dolomite on tar formation during gasification of torrefied biomass in a pressurized fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 849-859.
    19. Elhambakhsh, Abbas & Van Duc Long, Nguyen & Lamichhane, Pradeep & Hessel, Volker, 2023. "Recent progress and future directions in plasma-assisted biomass conversion to hydrogen," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    20. repec:sae:envval:v:29:y:2020:i:2:p:175-195 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Jesse L. Reynolds & Edward A. Parson, 2020. "Nonstate governance of solar geoengineering research," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 323-342, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1875-:d:526042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.