IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i22p8455-d970719.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation and Techno-Economic Assessment of Hydrogen Production from Biomass Gasification-Based Processes: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Jhulimar Castro

    (Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
    Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1008, Philippines)

  • Jonathan Leaver

    (Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland 1025, New Zealand)

  • Shusheng Pang

    (Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand)

Abstract

The development of low-carbon fuels from renewable resources is a key measure to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and mitigate climate change. Biomass gasification with subsequent gas processing and purification is a promising route to produce low-carbon hydrogen. In the past decade, simulation-based modelling using Aspen Plus software has supported the investigation of future potential industrial applications of this pathway. This article aims to provide a review of the modelling and economic assessment of woody biomass gasification-based hydrogen production, with focus on the evaluation of the model accuracy in predicting producer gas composition in comparison with experimental data depending on the approach implemented. The assessment of comprehensive models, which integrate biomass gasification with gas processing and purification, highlights how downstream gas processing could improve the quality of the syngas and, thus, the hydrogen yield. The information in this article provides an overview of the current practices, challenges, and opportunities for future research, particularly for the development of a comprehensive pathway for hydrogen production based on biomass gasification. Moreover, this review includes a techno-economic assessment of biomass to hydrogen processes, which will be useful for implementation at industrial-scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Jhulimar Castro & Jonathan Leaver & Shusheng Pang, 2022. "Simulation and Techno-Economic Assessment of Hydrogen Production from Biomass Gasification-Based Processes: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-37, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8455-:d:970719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anis, Samsudin & Zainal, Z.A., 2011. "Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2355-2377, June.
    2. Li, Guoxuan & Wang, Shuai & Zhao, Jiangang & Qi, Huaqing & Ma, Zhaoyuan & Cui, Peizhe & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Gao, Jun & Wang, Yinglong, 2020. "Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen production with methane tri-reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Mondal, Monoj Kumar & Balsora, Hemant Kumar & Varshney, Prachi, 2012. "Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 431-441.
    4. Tavares, Raquel & Monteiro, Eliseu & Tabet, Fouzi & Rouboa, Abel, 2020. "Numerical investigation of optimum operating conditions for syngas and hydrogen production from biomass gasification using Aspen Plus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1309-1314.
    5. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhao, Jun-Hong, 2009. "Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2263-2278, December.
    6. Adeyemi, Idowu & Janajreh, Isam, 2015. "Modeling of the entrained flow gasification: Kinetics-based ASPEN Plus model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 77-84.
    7. Karl, Jürgen & Pröll, Tobias, 2018. "Steam gasification of biomass in dual fluidized bed gasifiers: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 64-78.
    8. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & Parkinson, Brett & Hellgardt, Klaus & Shah, Nilay & Guillen-Gosalbez, Gonzalo, 2021. "Uncovering the true cost of hydrogen production routes using life cycle monetisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    9. Prashanth Reddy Buchireddy & Devin Peck & Mark Zappi & Ray Mark Bricka, 2021. "Catalytic Hot Gas Cleanup of Biomass Gasification Producer Gas via Steam Reforming Using Nickel-Supported Clay Minerals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Liu, Shijie, 2015. "A synergetic pretreatment technology for woody biomass conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 114-128.
    11. Zhang, Ziyin & Pang, Shusheng, 2019. "Experimental investigation of tar formation and producer gas composition in biomass steam gasification in a 100 kW dual fluidised bed gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 416-424.
    12. Aghaalikhani, Arash & Schmid, Johannes C. & Borello, Domenico & Fuchs, Joseph & Benedikt, Florian & Hofbauer, Herman & Rispoli, Franco & Henriksen, Ulrick B. & Sárossy, Zsuzsa & Cedola, Luca, 2019. "Detailed modelling of biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier with temperature variation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 703-718.
    13. Pala, Laxmi Prasad Rao & Wang, Qi & Kolb, Gunther & Hessel, Volker, 2017. "Steam gasification of biomass with subsequent syngas adjustment using shift reaction for syngas production: An Aspen Plus model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 484-492.
    14. Shahbaz, Muhammad & yusup, Suzana & Inayat, Abrar & Patrick, David Onoja & Ammar, Muhammad, 2017. "The influence of catalysts in biomass steam gasification and catalytic potential of coal bottom ash in biomass steam gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 468-476.
    15. Wang, Yinglong & Li, Guoxuan & Liu, Zhiqiang & Cui, Peizhe & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Yang, Sheng, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen process in comparison with coal-to-hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1063-1075.
    16. Parvez, Ashak Mahmud & Hafner, Selina & Hornberger, Matthias & Schmid, Max & Scheffknecht, Günter, 2021. "Sorption enhanced gasification (SEG) of biomass for tailored syngas production with in-situ CO2 capture: Current status, process scale-up experiences and outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Cao, Yan & Bai, Yu & Du, Jiang, 2022. "Co-gasification of rice husk and woody biomass blends in a CFB system: A modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 849-858.
    18. Kaushal, Priyanka & Tyagi, Rakesh, 2017. "Advanced simulation of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 629-636.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aghaalikhani, Arash & Schmid, Johannes C. & Borello, Domenico & Fuchs, Joseph & Benedikt, Florian & Hofbauer, Herman & Rispoli, Franco & Henriksen, Ulrick B. & Sárossy, Zsuzsa & Cedola, Luca, 2019. "Detailed modelling of biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier with temperature variation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 703-718.
    2. Song, Guohui & Xiao, Jun & Yan, Chao & Gu, Haiming & Zhao, Hao, 2022. "Quality of gaseous biofuels: Statistical assessment and guidance on production technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Oni, Babalola Aisosa & Sanni, Samuel Eshorame & Ikhazuangbe, Prosper Monday-Ohien & Ibegbu, Anayo Jerome, 2021. "Experimental investigation of steam-air gasification of Cymbopogon citratus using Ni/dolomite/CeO2/K2CO3 as catalyst in a dual stage reactor for syngas and hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    4. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Vera Marcantonio & Luisa Di Paola & Marcello De Falco & Mauro Capocelli, 2023. "Modeling of Biomass Gasification: From Thermodynamics to Process Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-30, October.
    6. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Ajorloo, Mojtaba & Ghodrat, Maryam & Scott, Jason & Strezov, Vladimir, 2022. "Modelling and statistical analysis of plastic biomass mixture co-gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    8. Safarian, Sahar & Unnþórsson, Rúnar & Richter, Christiaan, 2019. "A review of biomass gasification modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 378-391.
    9. Montagnaro, Fabio & Zaccariello, Lucio, 2023. "Performance assessment of a demonstration-scale biomass gasification power plant using material and energy flow analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    10. Huo, Hailong & Liu, Xunliang & Wen, Zhi & Lou, Guofeng & Dou, Ruifeng & Su, Fuyong & Zhou, Wenning & Jiang, Zeyi, 2021. "Case study of a novel low rank coal to calcium carbide process based on techno-economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Byun, Manhee & Kim, Heehyang & Lee, Hyunjun & Lim, Dongjun & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Conceptual design for methanol steam reforming in serial packed-bed reactors and membrane filters: Economic and environmental perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    12. Ruivo, Luís & Silva, Tiago & Neves, Daniel & Tarelho, Luís & Frade, Jorge, 2023. "Thermodynamic guidelines for improved operation of iron-based catalysts in gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    13. Ziółkowski, Paweł & Stasiak, Kamil & Amiri, Milad & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2023. "Negative carbon dioxide gas power plant integrated with gasification of sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    14. Parrillo, Francesco & Ardolino, Filomena & Calì, Gabriele & Marotto, Davide & Pettinau, Alberto & Arena, Umberto, 2021. "Fluidized bed gasification of eucalyptus chips: Axial profiles of syngas composition in a pilot scale reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    15. Sun, Zhao & Hu, Chenfeng & Zhang, Rongjun & Li, Hongwei & Wu, Yu & Sun, Zhiqiang, 2023. "Simulation of the deoxygenated and decarburized biomass cascade utilization system for comprehensive upgrading of green hydrogen generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    16. Pedro Tavares Borges & Electo Eduardo Silva Lora & Osvaldo José Venturini & Marcelo Risso Errera & Diego Mauricio Yepes Maya & Yusuf Makarfi Isa & Alexander Kozlov & Shu Zhang, 2024. "A Comprehensive Technical, Environmental, Economic, and Bibliometric Assessment of Hydrogen Production Through Biomass Gasification, Including Global and Brazilian Potentials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, October.
    17. He, Qing & Guo, Qinghua & Umeki, Kentaro & Ding, Lu & Wang, Fuchen & Yu, Guangsuo, 2021. "Soot formation during biomass gasification: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. Liu, Huan & Guo, Wei & Liu, Shuqin, 2022. "Comparative techno-economic performance analysis of underground coal gasification and surface coal gasification based coal-to-hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    19. AlNouss, Ahmed & Parthasarathy, Prakash & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Mackey, Hamish & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    20. Adnan, Muflih A. & Hossain, Mohammad M. & Golam Kibria, Md, 2022. "Converting waste into fuel via integrated thermal and electrochemical routes: An analysis of thermodynamic approach on thermal conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8455-:d:970719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.