IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i3p718-d490128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospects and Obstacles for Green Hydrogen Production in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Kopteva

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 21st Line of the VI, 2, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Leonid Kalimullin

    (Department of Strategic Development, RusHydro, 7 Malaya Dmitrovka Street, 127006 Moscow, Russia)

  • Pavel Tcvetkov

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 21st Line of the VI, 2, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Amilcar Soares

    (Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

Renewable energy is considered the one of the most promising solutions to meet sustainable development goals in terms of climate change mitigation. Today, we face the problem of further scaling up renewable energy infrastructure, which requires the creation of reliable energy storages, environmentally friendly carriers, like hydrogen, and competitive international markets. These issues provoke the involvement of resource-based countries in the energy transition, which is questionable in terms of economic efficiency, compared to conventional hydrocarbon resources. To shed a light on the possible efficiency of green hydrogen production in such countries, this study is aimed at: (1) comparing key Russian trends of green hydrogen development with global trends, (2) presenting strategic scenarios for the Russian energy sector development, (3) presenting a case study of Russian hydrogen energy project «Dyakov Ust-Srednekanskaya HPP» in Magadan region. We argue that without significant changes in strategic planning and without focus on sustainable solutions support, the further development of Russian power industry will be halted in a conservative scenario with the limited presence of innovative solutions in renewable energy industries. Our case study showed that despite the closeness to Japan hydrogen market, economic efficiency is on the edge of zero, with payback period around 17 years. The decrease in project capacity below 543.6 MW will immediately lead to a negative NPV. The key reason for that is the low average market price of hydrogen ($14/kg), which is only a bit higher than its production cost ($12.5/kg), while transportation requires about $0.96/kg more. Despite the discouraging results, it should be taken into account that such strategic projects are at the edge of energy development. We see them as an opportunity to lead transnational energy trade of green hydrogen, which could be competitive in the medium term, especially with state support.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Kopteva & Leonid Kalimullin & Pavel Tcvetkov & Amilcar Soares, 2021. "Prospects and Obstacles for Green Hydrogen Production in Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:718-:d:490128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/3/718/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/3/718/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stepan Zemtsov & Vera Barinova & Alexey Pankratov & Evgeniy Kutsenko, 2016. "Potential High-Tech Сlusters in Russian Regions: From Current Policy to New Growth Areas," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 10(3 (eng)), pages 34-52.
    2. Salvi, B.L. & Subramanian, K.A., 2015. "Sustainable development of road transportation sector using hydrogen energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1132-1155.
    3. V. E. Seliverstov, 2018. "Strategic Planning and Strategic Errors: Russian Realities and Trends," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 110-120, January.
    4. Klimenko, V.V. & Fedotova, E.V. & Tereshin, A.G., 2018. "Vulnerability of the Russian power industry to the climate change," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1010-1022.
    5. Yaroslav Shklyarskiy & Zbigniew Hanzelka & Aleksandr Skamyin, 2020. "Experimental Study of Harmonic Influence on Electrical Energy Metering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Rubin, Edward S. & Azevedo, Inês M.L. & Jaramillo, Paulina & Yeh, Sonia, 2015. "A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 198-218.
    7. Debra J. Davidson, 2019. "Exnovating for a renewable energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 254-256, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Aleksei Kazanin & Evgeniya Rutenko, 2023. "Strategic Priorities for Green Diversification of Oil and Gas Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Elena Vechkinzova & Larissa P. Steblyakova & Natalia Roslyakova & Balnur Omarova, 2022. "Prospects for the Development of Hydrogen Energy: Overview of Global Trends and the Russian Market State," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-29, November.
    3. Dmitry Radoushinsky & Kirill Gogolinskiy & Yousef Dellal & Ivan Sytko & Abhishek Joshi, 2023. "Actual Quality Changes in Natural Resource and Gas Grid Use in Prospective Hydrogen Technology Roll-Out in the World and Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-31, October.
    4. Tarkowski, R. & Uliasz-Misiak, B., 2022. "Towards underground hydrogen storage: A review of barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Pieter W. M. Vasbinder & Antoine W. G. de Vries & Wim Westerman, 2021. "Hydrogen Infrastructure Project Risks in The Netherlands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Vladimir Kindra & Igor Maksimov & Maksim Oparin & Olga Zlyvko & Andrey Rogalev, 2023. "Hydrogen Technologies: A Critical Review and Feasibility Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Marek Jaszczur & Qusay Hassan & Aws Zuhair Sameen & Hayder M. Salman & Olushola Tomilayo Olapade & Szymon Wieteska, 2023. "Massive Green Hydrogen Production Using Solar and Wind Energy: Comparison between Europe and the Middle East," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-26, July.
    8. Martins, Flavio Pinheiro & De-León Almaraz, Sofía & Botelho Junior, Amilton Barbosa & Azzaro-Pantel, Catherine & Parikh, Priti, 2024. "Hydrogen and the sustainable development goals: Synergies and trade-offs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    9. Nikolay Tsvetkov & Stanislav Boldyryev & Aleksandr Shilin & Yuriy Krivoshein & Aleksandr Tolstykh, 2022. "Hardware and Software Implementation for Solar Hot Water System in Northern Regions of Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Enas Taha Sayed & Abdul Ghani Olabi & Abdul Hai Alami & Ali Radwan & Ayman Mdallal & Ahmed Rezk & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, 2023. "Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Cristina Hora & Florin Ciprian Dan & Nicolae Rancov & Gabriela Elena Badea & Calin Secui, 2022. "Main Trends and Research Directions in Hydrogen Generation Using Low Temperature Electrolysis: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Cheilas, Panagiotis T. & Daglis, Theodoros & Xidonas, Panos & Michaelides, Panayotis G. & Konstantakis, Konstantinos N., 2024. "Financial dynamics, green transition and hydrogen economy in Europe," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Vladimir Kindra & Andrey Rogalev & Maksim Oparin & Dmitriy Kovalev & Mikhail Ostrovsky, 2023. "Research and Development of the Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycle for the Combined Production of Electricity and Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Konstantin Gomonov & Marina Reshetnikova & Svetlana Ratner, 2023. "Economic Analysis of Recently Announced Green Hydrogen Projects in Russia: A Multiple Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Evgeniya Rutenko, 2022. "Strategic Planning of Oil and Gas Companies: The Decarbonization Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    16. Armin Razmjoo & Mostafa Rezaei & Seyedali Mirjalili & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Giuseppe Piras, 2021. "Development of Sustainable Energy Use with Attention to Fruitful Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Andrea Dumančić & Nela Vlahinić Lenz & Goran Majstrović, 2023. "Can Hydrogen Production Be Economically Viable on the Existing Gas-Fired Power Plant Location? New Empirical Evidence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Sunwoo & Choi, Yechan & Park, Joungho & Adams, Derrick & Heo, Seongmin & Lee, Jay H., 2024. "Multi-period, multi-timescale stochastic optimization model for simultaneous capacity investment and energy management decisions for hybrid Micro-Grids with green hydrogen production under uncertainty," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    2. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Aleksandra Matuszewska-Janica & Dorota Żebrowska-Suchodolska & Urszula Ala-Karvia & Marta Hozer-Koćmiel, 2021. "Changes in Electricity Production from Renewable Energy Sources in the European Union Countries in 2005–2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Shangfeng Han & Baosheng Zhang & Xiaoyang Sun & Song Han & Mikael Höök, 2017. "China’s Energy Transition in the Power and Transport Sectors from a Substitution Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Polzin, Friedemann & Sanders, Mark & Serebriakova, Alexandra, 2021. "Finance in global transition scenarios: Mapping investments by technology into finance needs by source," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Gawel, Erik & Lehmann, Paul & Purkus, Alexandra & Söderholm, Patrik & Witte, Katherina, 2017. "Rationales for technology-specific RES support and their relevance for German policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 16-26.
    7. René Aïd & Matteo Basei & Huyên Pham, 2020. "A McKean–Vlasov approach to distributed electricity generation development," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(2), pages 269-310, April.
    8. Moon, Hee Seung & Song, Yong Hyun & Lee, Ji Woo & Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Kim, Seung Wan, 2024. "Implementation cost of net zero electricity system: Analysis based on Korean national target," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Vinca, Adriano & Rottoli, Marianna & Marangoni, Giacomo & Tavoni, Massimo, 2017. "The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage Electricity in Attaining 1.5 and 2°C," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 266285, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    10. Lavidas, George, 2019. "Energy and socio-economic benefits from the development of wave energy in Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1290-1300.
    11. Luis Santos Pereira, 2017. "Water, Agriculture and Food: Challenges and Issues," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 2985-2999, August.
    12. Chen, Huadong & Wang, Can & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Jianhui, 2018. "Simulating the impact of investment preference on low-carbon transition in power sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 440-455.
    13. Leonidas Paroussos & Kostas Fragkiadakis & Panagiotis Fragkos, 2020. "Macro-economic analysis of green growth policies: the role of finance and technical progress in Italian green growth," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 591-608, June.
    14. Nils Thonemann & Anna Schulte & Daniel Maga, 2020. "How to Conduct Prospective Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Technologies? A Systematic Review and Methodological Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
    15. Hafele, Jakob & Le Lannou, Laure-Alizée & Rochowicz, Nils & Kuhls, Sonia & Gräbner-Radkowitsch, Claudius, 2023. "Securing future-fit jobs in the green transformation: A policy framework for industrial policy," ZOE Discussion Papers 10, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    16. Newbery, David & Pollitt, Michael G. & Ritz, Robert A. & Strielkowski, Wadim, 2018. "Market design for a high-renewables European electricity system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 695-707.
    17. Huo, Dongxia & Bagadeem, Salim & Elsherazy, Tarek Abbas & Nasnodkar, Siddhesh Prabhu & Kalra, Akash, 2023. "Renewable energy consumption and the rising effect of climate policy uncertainty: Fresh policy analysis from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1459-1474.
    18. Olga V. Netskina & Elena S. Tayban & Anna M. Ozerova & Oxana V. Komova & Valentina I. Simagina, 2019. "Solid-State NaBH 4 /Co Composite as Hydrogen Storage Material: Effect of the Pressing Pressure on Hydrogen Generation Rate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-7, March.
    19. Daniela Vîrjan & Claudia Rodica Popescu & Iuliana Pop & Delia Popescu, 2023. "Energy Transition and Sustainable Development at the Level of the European Union," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(63), pages 429-429, April.
    20. Baldwin, Elizabeth & Cai, Yongyang & Kuralbayeva, Karlygash, 2020. "To build or not to build? Capital stocks and climate policy∗," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:718-:d:490128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.