IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i15p4664-d606652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogas Production from Coffee Pulp and Chicken Feathers Using Liquid- and Solid-State Anaerobic Digestions

Author

Listed:
  • Siswo Sumardiono

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50239, Indonesia)

  • Bakti Jos

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50239, Indonesia)

  • Agata Advensia Eksa Dewanti

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50239, Indonesia)

  • Isa Mahendra

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50239, Indonesia)

  • Heri Cahyono

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50239, Indonesia)

Abstract

Agricultural waste, particularly lignocellulose, has been used in the second generation of biogas. Coffee pulp and chicken feathers can be developed as biogas raw materials because of their suitability as a biogas substrate. This study investigates the effect of the percentage of total solids (TS), carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N, g/g), and delignification pretreatment on biogas production from coffee pulp and chicken feathers, and aims to compose kinetics using the modified Gompertz model. The results show that adjusting the percentage of TS at low-level speeds up the degradation process, which increases chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction and biogas production. COD reduction and biogas production increase optimally at the 25 (g/g) C/N ratio. Pretreatment delignification aids microorganisms in substrate decomposition, resulting in faster COD reduction and biogas conversion. The 25% TS and 25 (g/g) C/N ratio with the delignification process achieved the best biogas production, with biogas production of 10,438.04 mL. The Gompertz method shows that the difference in TS percentage can influence biogas production. Moreover, the method shows that biogas production is higher with the delignification process than without it.

Suggested Citation

  • Siswo Sumardiono & Bakti Jos & Agata Advensia Eksa Dewanti & Isa Mahendra & Heri Cahyono, 2021. "Biogas Production from Coffee Pulp and Chicken Feathers Using Liquid- and Solid-State Anaerobic Digestions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4664-:d:606652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4664/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4664/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Qiong & Liu, Ronghou & Li, Kun & Ma, Ruijie, 2019. "A review of crop straw pretreatment methods for biogas production by anaerobic digestion in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 51-58.
    2. Xionghui Gao & Xiaoyu Tang & Kunyang Zhao & Venkatesh Balan & Qili Zhu, 2021. "Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Spent Mushroom Substrate with Different Livestock Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Fagbohungbe, Michael O. & Onyeri, Chidinma A. & Semple, Kirk T., 2019. "Co-fermentation of whey permeates and cattle slurry using a partitioned up-flow anaerobic digestion tank," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 567-572.
    4. Ciro Vasmara & Stefano Cianchetta & Rosa Marchetti & Enrico Ceotto & Stefania Galletti, 2021. "Potassium Hydroxyde Pre-Treatment Enhances Methane Yield from Giant Reed ( Arundo donax L.)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Siswo Sumardiono & Gebyar Adisukmo & Muthia Hanif & Budiyono Budiyono & Heri Cahyono, 2021. "Effects of Pretreatment and Ratio of Solid Sago Waste to Rumen on Biogas Production through Solid-State Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-11, July.
    6. Gao, Shumei & Hu, Changwei & Sun, Shiqing & Xu, Jie & Zhao, Yongjun & Zhang, Hui, 2018. "Performance of piggery wastewater treatment and biogas upgrading by three microalgal cultivation technologies under different initial COD concentration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 360-369.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yessenia Martínez-Ruiz & Diego Fernando Manotas-Duque & Juan Carlos Osorio-Gómez & Howard Ramírez-Malule, 2022. "Evaluation of Energy Potential from Coffee Pulp in a Hydrothermal Power Market through System Dynamics: The Case of Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Mo Gu & Seon Young Park & Ji Yeon Park & Byoung-In Sang & Byoung Seong Jeon & Hyunook Kim & Jin Hyung Lee, 2021. "Impact of Attrition Ball-Mill on Characteristics and Biochemical Methane Potential of Food Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Tian, Wenjing & Li, Jianhao & Zhu, Lirong & Li, Wen & He, Linyan & Gu, Li & Deng, Rui & Shi, Dezhi & Chai, Hongxiang & Gao, Meng, 2021. "Insights of enhancing methane production under high-solid anaerobic digestion of wheat straw by calcium peroxide pretreatment and zero valent iron addition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1321-1332.
    3. Karami, Kavosh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Kumar, Rajeev, 2022. "Mesophilic aerobic digestion: An efficient and inexpensive biological pretreatment to improve biogas production from highly-recalcitrant pinewood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    4. Zhang, Huaiwen & Yao, Yiqing & Deng, Jun & Zhang, Jian-Li & Qiu, Yaojing & Li, Guofu & Liu, Jian, 2022. "Hydrogen production via anaerobic digestion of coal modified by white-rot fungi and its application benefits analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. David Fangueiro & Paula Alvarenga & Rita Fragoso, 2021. "Horticulture and Orchards as New Markets for Manure Valorisation with Less Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, January.
    7. Safieddin Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad, 2020. "Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 29-37.
    8. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Giovanni Alessandro Cappelli & Fabrizio Ginaldi & Davide Fanchini & Sebastiano Andrea Corinzia & Salvatore Luciano Cosentino & Enrico Ceotto, 2021. "Model-Based Assessment of Giant Reed ( Arundo donax L.) Energy Yield in the Form of Diverse Biofuels in Marginal Areas of Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Klein, Bruno Colling & Chagas, Mateus Ferreira & Watanabe, Marcos Djun Barbosa & Bonomi, Antonio & Maciel Filho, Rubens, 2019. "Low carbon biofuels and the New Brazilian National Biofuel Policy (RenovaBio): A case study for sugarcane mills and integrated sugarcane-microalgae biorefineries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    11. Sun, Hui & Wang, Enzhen & Li, Xiang & Cui, Xian & Guo, Jianbin & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "Potential biomethane production from crop residues in China: Contributions to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    12. Meng, Xingyao & Wang, Qingping & Zhao, Xixi & Cai, Yafan & Ma, Xuguang & Fu, Jingyi & Wang, Pan & Wang, Yongjing & Liu, Wei & Ren, Lianhai, 2023. "A review of the technologies used for preserving anaerobic digestion inoculum," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Rahmani, Ali Mohammad & Tyagi, Vinay Kumar & Kazmi, A.A. & Ojha, Chandra Shekhar P., 2023. "Hydrothermal and thermal-acid pretreatments of wheat straw: Methane yield, recalcitrant formation, process inhibition, kinetic modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    14. Shen, Qian & Zhu, Xianqing & Peng, Yang & Xu, Mian & Huang, Yun & Xia, Ao & Zhu, Xun & Liao, Qiang, 2024. "Structure evolution characteristic of hydrochar and nitrogen transformation mechanism during co-hydrothermal carbonization process of microalgae and biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    15. Xia, Ao & Sun, Chihe & Fu, Qian & Liao, Qiang & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xun & Li, Qing, 2020. "Biofuel production from wet microalgae biomass: Comparison of physicochemical properties and extraction performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    16. Li, Ming & Zhou, Minghua & Tian, Xiaoyu & Tan, Chaolin & Gu, Tingyue, 2021. "Enhanced bioenergy recovery and nutrient removal from swine wastewater using an airlift-type photosynthetic microbial fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    17. Stolecka, Katarzyna & Rusin, Andrzej, 2021. "Potential hazards posed by biogas plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Xiao He & Lianjun Wang & Anthony Lau, 2020. "Investigation of Steam Treatment on the Sorption Behavior of Rice Straw Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-9, October.
    19. Kan, Tao & Strezov, Vladimir & Evans, Tim & He, Jing & Kumar, Ravinder & Lu, Qiang, 2020. "Catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: A review of variations in process factors and system structure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Stephen Tangwe & Patrick Mukumba & Golden Makaka, 2022. "Design and Employing of a Non-Linear Response Surface Model to Predict the Microbial Loads in Anaerobic Digestion of Cow Manure: Batch Balloon Digester," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-25, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4664-:d:606652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.