IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i13p4043-d588629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment Method Combining Independent Protection Layers (IPL) of Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) and RISKCURVES Software: Case Study of Hydrogen Refueling Stations in Urban Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Byoungjik Park

    (Fire Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si 18544, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
    School of Social Safety System Engineering, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Yangkyun Kim

    (Fire Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si 18544, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Kwanwoo Lee

    (School of Social Safety System Engineering, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Shinwon Paik

    (School of Social Safety System Engineering, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Chankyu Kang

    (School of Social Safety System Engineering, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

Abstract

The commercialization of eco-friendly hydrogen vehicles has elicited attempts to expand hydrogen refueling stations in urban areas; however, safety measures to reduce the risk of jet fires have not been established. The RISKCURVES software was used to evaluate the individual and societal risks of hydrogen refueling stations in urban areas, and the F–N (Frequency–Number of fatalities) curve was used to compare whether the safety measures satisfied international standards. From the results of the analysis, it was found that there is a risk of explosion in the expansion of hydrogen refueling stations in urban areas, and safety measures should be considered. To lower the risk of hydrogen refueling stations, this study applied the passive and active independent protection layers (IPLs) of LOPA (Layer of Protection Analysis) and confirmed that these measures significantly reduced societal risk as well as individual risk and met international standards. In particular, such measures could effectively reduce the impact of jet fire in dispensers and tube trailers that had a high risk. Measures employing both IPL types were efficient in meeting international standard criteria; however, passive IPLs were found to have a greater risk reduction effect than active IPLs. The combination of RISKCURVES and LOPA is an appropriate risk assessment method that can reduce work time and mitigate risks through protective measures compared to existing risk assessment methods. This method can be applied to risk assessment and risk mitigation not only for hydrogen facilities, but also for hazardous materials with high fire or explosion risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Byoungjik Park & Yangkyun Kim & Kwanwoo Lee & Shinwon Paik & Chankyu Kang, 2021. "Risk Assessment Method Combining Independent Protection Layers (IPL) of Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) and RISKCURVES Software: Case Study of Hydrogen Refueling Stations in Urban Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:4043-:d:588629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/4043/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/4043/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junji Sakamoto & Hitoshi Misono & Jo Nakayama & Naoya Kasai & Tadahiro Shibutani & Atsumi Miyake, 2018. "Evaluation of Safety Measures of a Hydrogen Fueling Station Using Physical Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, October.
    2. David Jure Jovan & Gregor Dolanc, 2020. "Can Green Hydrogen Production Be Economically Viable under Current Market Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Anshuman Chaube & Andrew Chapman & Yosuke Shigetomi & Kathryn Huff & James Stubbins, 2020. "The Role of Hydrogen in Achieving Long Term Japanese Energy System Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Molin Sun & Zhongyi Zheng & Longhui Gang, 2018. "Uncertainty Analysis of the Estimated Risk in Formal Safety Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Jacek Jaworski & Paweł Kułaga & Tomasz Blacharski, 2020. "Study of the Effect of Addition of Hydrogen to Natural Gas on Diaphragm Gas Meters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Paola Russo & Alessandra De Marco & Fulvio Parisi, 2020. "Assessment of the Damage from Hydrogen Pipeline Explosions on People and Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changsoo Kim & Younggeun Lee & Kyeongsu Kim, 2023. "Comparative Risk Assessment of a Hydrogen Refueling Station Using Gaseous Hydrogen and Formic Acid as the Hydrogen Carrier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Jongbeom Kwak & Haktae Lee & Somin Park & Jaehyuk Park & Seungho Jung, 2023. "Risk Assessment of a Hydrogen Refueling Station in an Urban Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justyna Cader & Renata Koneczna & Piotr Olczak, 2021. "The Impact of Economic, Energy, and Environmental Factors on the Development of the Hydrogen Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Talal Yusaf & K. Kadirgama & Steve Hall & Louis Fernandes, 2022. "The Future of Sustainable Aviation Fuels, Challenges and Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-4, November.
    3. Ju-Yeol Ryu & Sungho Park & Changhyeong Lee & Seonghyeon Hwang & Jongwoong Lim, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen–Natural Gas Blended Fuels for 400 MW Combined Cycle Power Plants (CCPPs)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Sebastián Mantilla & Diogo M. F. Santos, 2022. "Green and Blue Hydrogen Production: An Overview in Colombia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Michel Noussan & Pier Paolo Raimondi & Rossana Scita & Manfred Hafner, 2020. "The Role of Green and Blue Hydrogen in the Energy Transition—A Technological and Geopolitical Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Adrian Neacsa & Cristian Nicolae Eparu & Cașen Panaitescu & Doru Bogdan Stoica & Bogdan Ionete & Alina Prundurel & Sorin Gal, 2023. "Hydrogen–Natural Gas Mix—A Viable Perspective for Environment and Society," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-38, August.
    7. Doyeon Lee & Keunhwan Kim, 2021. "Research and Development Investment and Collaboration Framework for the Hydrogen Economy in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Christian Schnuelle & Timo Wassermann & Torben Stuehrmann, 2022. "Mind the Gap—A Socio-Economic Analysis on Price Developments of Green Hydrogen, Synthetic Fuels, and Conventional Energy Carriers in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Alessandra Perna & Mariagiovanna Minutillo & Simona Di Micco & Elio Jannelli, 2022. "Design and Costs Analysis of Hydrogen Refuelling Stations Based on Different Hydrogen Sources and Plant Configurations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Yunesky Masip Macía & Pablo Rodríguez Machuca & Angel Alexander Rodríguez Soto & Roberto Carmona Campos, 2021. "Green Hydrogen Value Chain in the Sustainability for Port Operations: Case Study in the Region of Valparaiso, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Shamal Chandra Karmaker & Andrew Chapman & Kanchan Kumar Sen & Shahadat Hosan & Bidyut Baran Saha, 2022. "Renewable Energy Pathways toward Accelerating Hydrogen Fuel Production: Evidence from Global Hydrogen Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Sergii Bespalko & Jerzy Mizeraczyk, 2022. "Energy Balance of Hydrogen Production in the Cathodic Regime of Plasma-Driven Solution Electrolysis of Na 2 CO 3 Aqueous Solution with Argon Carrier Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Romeo, Luis M. & Cavana, Marco & Bailera, Manuel & Leone, Pierluigi & Peña, Begoña & Lisbona, Pilar, 2022. "Non-stoichiometric methanation as strategy to overcome the limitations of green hydrogen injection into the natural gas grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    14. Seohee Lim & Jin-Soo Park, 2020. "Composite Membranes Using Hydrophilized Porous Substrates for Hydrogen Based Energy Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Jacek Jaworski & Paweł Kułaga & Giorgio Ficco & Marco Dell’Isola, 2021. "Domestic Gas Meter Durability in Hydrogen and Natural Gas Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Anna Huszal & Jacek Jaworski, 2020. "Studies of the Impact of Hydrogen on the Stability of Gaseous Mixtures of THT," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Lorenzo Bolfo & Francesco Devia & Guglielmo Lomonaco, 2021. "Nuclear Hydrogen Production: Modeling and Preliminary Optimization of a Helical Tube Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Jacek Jaworski & Adrian Dudek, 2020. "Study of the Effects of Changes in Gas Composition as Well as Ambient and Gas Temperature on Errors of Indications of Thermal Gas Meters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Marcelo León & Javier Silva & Rodrigo Ortíz-Soto & Samuel Carrasco, 2023. "A Techno-Economic Study for Off-Grid Green Hydrogen Production Plants: The Case of Chile," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Anton Manakhov & Maxim Orlov & Mustafa Babiker & Abdulaziz S. Al-Qasim, 2022. "A Perspective on Decarbonizing Mobility: An All-Electrification vs. an All-Hydrogenization Venue," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:4043-:d:588629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.