IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i6p1359-d332688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Work Productivity and Costs of a Stationary Chipper Applied to the Harvesting of Olive Tree Pruning for Bio-Energy Production

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Suardi

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, (RM), Italy)

  • Francesco Latterini

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, (RM), Italy)

  • Vincenzo Alfano

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, (RM), Italy)

  • Nadia Palmieri

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, (RM), Italy)

  • Simone Bergonzoli

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via Milano, 43, 24047 Treviglio, (BG), Italy)

  • Luigi Pari

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, (RM), Italy)

Abstract

Pruning residues could represent an important biomass resources for energy production. Only in Italy it has been estimated that an annual quantity of biomass of over 2600 kt of dry matter could be obtained from olive residues. Several machines developed for pruning harvesting are available in the market, most of which are tractor-driven, while limited knowledge is available on performance, quality of work and costs of harvesting logistics based on stationary chippers. The aim of the present paper is to analyze machine performance of a forestry stationary chipper applied to pruning harvesting for what concerns work productivity, quality of the comminuted product and harvesting operating costs. This system is actually applied by Fiusis Company, an Italian enterprise which manages a biomass power plant exclusively powered by olive trees’ pruning residues, and it has never been analyzed in literature. The results obtained showed consistent work productivity, which resulted the highest ever found in olive pruning harvesting systems and equal to 5.23 ± 0.81 t dm ·h −1 . This high work productivity allowed also to obtain a little economic gain from a matter, which is actually considered a problem for olive groves’ owners and not a potential source of income. In particular, the use of a stationary chipper seemed very efficient in olive groves with a consistent amount of wooden residues to be processed and with big branches not harvestable by the most common towed pruning harvester. In addition, the stationary chipper has the advantage of avoiding the preliminary raking operation, which results in reduced costs for the farmer.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Suardi & Francesco Latterini & Vincenzo Alfano & Nadia Palmieri & Simone Bergonzoli & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Analysis of the Work Productivity and Costs of a Stationary Chipper Applied to the Harvesting of Olive Tree Pruning for Bio-Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1359-:d:332688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1359/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1359/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Acampora, Andrea & Croce, Sara & Assirelli, Alberto & Del Giudice, Angelo & Spinelli, Raffaele & Suardi, Alessandro & Pari, Luigi, 2013. "Product contamination and harvesting losses from mechanized recovery of olive tree pruning residues for energy use," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 350-353.
    2. Luigi Pari & Vincenzo Alfano & Daniel Garcia-Galindo & Alessandro Suardi & Enrico Santangelo, 2018. "Pruning Biomass Potential in Italy Related to Crop Characteristics, Agricultural Practices and Agro-Climatic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Lu, Li & Tang, Ya & Xie, Jia-sui & Yuan, Yuan-liang, 2009. "The role of marginal agricultural land-based mulberry planting in biomass energy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1789-1794.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Banaś & Katarzyna Utnik-Banaś, 2022. "Using Timber as a Renewable Resource for Energy Production in Sustainable Forest Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-8, March.
    2. González-Arias, J. & Gómez, X. & González-Castaño, M. & Sánchez, M.E. & Rosas, J.G. & Cara-Jiménez, J., 2022. "Insights into the product quality and energy requirements for solid biofuel production: A comparison of hydrothermal carbonization, pyrolysis and torrefaction of olive tree pruning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    3. Giuseppe Maggiotto & Gianpiero Colangelo & Marco Milanese & Arturo de Risi, 2023. "Thermochemical Technologies for the Optimization of Olive Wood Biomass Energy Exploitation: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni & Alessandro Suardi & Vincenzo Alfano & Simone Bergonzoli & Nadia Palmieri & Luigi Pari, 2020. "A GIS Approach to Locate a Small Size Biomass Plant Powered by Olive Pruning and to Estimate Supply Chain Costs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Alessandro Suardi & Francesco Latterini & Vincenzo Alfano & Nadia Palmieri & Simone Bergonzoli & Emmanouil Karampinis & Michael Alexandros Kougioumtzis & Panagiotis Grammelis & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Machine Performance and Hog Fuel Quality Evaluation in Olive Tree Pruning Harvesting Conducted Using a Towed Shredder on Flat and Hilly Fields," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Luigi Pari & Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni, 2020. "Herbaceous Oil Crops, a Review on Mechanical Harvesting State of the Art," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Warguła, Łukasz & Kukla, Mateusz & Wieczorek, Bartosz & Krawiec, Piotr, 2022. "Energy consumption of the wood size reduction processes with employment of a low-power machines with various cutting mechanisms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 630-639.
    8. Rodolfo Picchio & Francesco Latterini & Rachele Venanzi & Walter Stefanoni & Alessandro Suardi & Damiano Tocci & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Pellet Production from Woody and Non-Woody Feedstocks: A Review on Biomass Quality Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Luigi Pari & Vincenzo Alfano & Walter Stefanoni & Francesco Latterini & Federico Liuzzi & Isabella De Bari & Vito Valerio & Anna Ciancolini, 2021. "Inulin Content in Chipped and Whole Roots of Cardoon after Six Months Storage under Natural Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-11, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Suardi & Francesco Latterini & Vincenzo Alfano & Nadia Palmieri & Simone Bergonzoli & Emmanouil Karampinis & Michael Alexandros Kougioumtzis & Panagiotis Grammelis & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Machine Performance and Hog Fuel Quality Evaluation in Olive Tree Pruning Harvesting Conducted Using a Towed Shredder on Flat and Hilly Fields," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni & Alessandro Suardi & Vincenzo Alfano & Simone Bergonzoli & Nadia Palmieri & Luigi Pari, 2020. "A GIS Approach to Locate a Small Size Biomass Plant Powered by Olive Pruning and to Estimate Supply Chain Costs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Nadia Palmieri & Alessandro Suardi & Vincenzo Alfano & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Circular Economy Model: Insights from a Case Study in South Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Carlo Bisaglia & Massimo Brambilla & Maurizio Cutini & Antonio Bortolotti & Guido Rota & Giorgio Minuti & Roberto Sargiani, 2018. "Reusing Pruning Residues for Thermal Energy Production: A Mobile App to Match Biomass Availability with the Heating Energy Balance of Agro-Industrial Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Marek Helis & Maria Strzelczyk & Wojciech Golimowski & Aleksandra Steinhoff-Wrześniewska & Anna Paszkiewicz-Jasińska & Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw & Adam Koniuszy & Marek Hryniewicz, 2021. "Biomass Potential of the Marginal Land of the Polish Sudetes Mountain Range," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Luigi Pari & Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni, 2020. "Herbaceous Oil Crops, a Review on Mechanical Harvesting State of the Art," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Kamel, Salah & El-Sattar, Hoda Abd & Vera, David & Jurado, Francisco, 2018. "Bioenergy potential from agriculture residues for energy generation in Egypt," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 28-37.
    8. Monika Słupska & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Roman Stopa, 2019. "Determination of Strength Properties of Energy Plants on the Example of Miscanthus × Giganteus , Rosa Multiflora and Salix Viminalis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Warguła, Łukasz & Kukla, Mateusz & Wieczorek, Bartosz & Krawiec, Piotr, 2022. "Energy consumption of the wood size reduction processes with employment of a low-power machines with various cutting mechanisms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 630-639.
    10. Qiu, Huanguang & Sun, Laixiang & Huang, Jikun & Rozelle, Scott, 2012. "Liquid biofuels in China: Current status, government policies, and future opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3095-3104.
    11. Joselin Herbert, G.M. & Unni Krishnan, A., 2016. "Quantifying environmental performance of biomass energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 292-308.
    12. Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2019. "The Influence of Apple Orchard Management on Energy Performance and Pruned Biomass Harvesting for Energetic Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak & Kazimierz Warmiński & Dariusz Załuski & Ewelina Olba-Zięty, 2020. "Willow Biomass as Energy Feedstock: The Effect of Habitat, Genotype and Harvest Rotation on Thermophysical Properties and Elemental Composition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Andrea Acampora & Vincenzo Civitarese & Giulio Sperandio & Negar Rezaei, 2021. "Qualitative Characterization of the Pellet Obtained from Hazelnut and Olive Tree Pruning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Zhuang, Dafang & Jiang, Dong & Liu, Lei & Huang, Yaohuan, 2011. "Assessment of bioenergy potential on marginal land in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 1050-1056, February.
    16. Luigi Pari & Vincenzo Alfano & Daniel Garcia-Galindo & Alessandro Suardi & Enrico Santangelo, 2018. "Pruning Biomass Potential in Italy Related to Crop Characteristics, Agricultural Practices and Agro-Climatic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Chen, Lihong & Li, Xiaobing & Wen, Wanyu & Jia, Jingdun & Li, Guoqing & Deng, Fei, 2012. "The status, predicament and countermeasures of biomass secondary energy production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 6212-6219.
    18. Bilgen, Selçuk & Keleş, Sedat & Sarıkaya, İkbal & Kaygusuz, Kamil, 2015. "A perspective for potential and technology of bioenergy in Turkey: Present case and future view," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 228-239.
    19. Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Daniel García-Galindo, 2019. "Implementing Agricultural Pruning to Energy in Europe: Technical, Economic and Implementation Potentials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, April.
    20. Jan Den Boer & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Emilia Den Boer & Daniel García-Galindo & Techane Bosona & Girma Gebresenbet, 2020. "Life-Cycle Assessment of the Use of Peach Pruning Residues for Electricity Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1359-:d:332688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.