IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v94y2018icp28-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioenergy potential from agriculture residues for energy generation in Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Kamel, Salah
  • El-Sattar, Hoda Abd
  • Vera, David
  • Jurado, Francisco

Abstract

Recently, biomass represents about 14% of primary energy consumption and expected to provide 50% of world total primary energy consumption by 2050. This paper clarifies an appraisal of the possibilities available in Egypt to become one of the countries of the production of bioenergy, especially from the crop remnants of agriculture production. Egypt annually produces a large amount of biomass of up to 40 million tons. Unfortunately, instead of the possibility of exploiting these wastes to contribute to the energy sector and economic growth, about 52% of these wastes are disposed of by direct burning, which may cause many environmental problems. The only widespread form of biomass use in Egypt is biogas used in rural areas. In addition, the potential theoretical energy from the most important crop residues available in Egypt is evaluated according to previous studies. It is found that energy of 189.76 PJ/year can be produced from dry crop residues of 12.5 million tons/year. For livestock residues, specifically cattle manure, it is estimated in this study that the potential biogas in Egypt of 7.2 million head of cattle is 53.2 million m3 / day with a total potential energy of 699 TJ per year. However, the potential of bioenergy depends largely on the availability, geographical distribution and accessibility of the actual waste. The most likely areas for these potentials are Middle Delta and Upper Egypt. This could potentially develop a long-term strategy for the smart use of vital waste available for bioenergy production to be economically profitable and sustainable.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamel, Salah & El-Sattar, Hoda Abd & Vera, David & Jurado, Francisco, 2018. "Bioenergy potential from agriculture residues for energy generation in Egypt," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 28-37.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:94:y:2018:i:c:p:28-37
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118304350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Long, Huiling & Li, Xiaobing & Wang, Hong & Jia, Jingdun, 2013. "Biomass resources and their bioenergy potential estimation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 344-352.
    2. Adam J. L. Harris & Han-Hui Por & Stephen B. Broomell, 2017. "Anchoring climate change communications," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 387-398, February.
    3. Mohammad I. Jahirul & Mohammad G. Rasul & Ashfaque Ahmed Chowdhury & Nanjappa Ashwath, 2012. "Biofuels Production through Biomass Pyrolysis —A Technological Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-50, November.
    4. Tol, Richard S.J., 2017. "The structure of the climate debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 431-438.
    5. Pepermans, G. & Driesen, J. & Haeseldonckx, D. & Belmans, R. & D'haeseleer, W., 2005. "Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 787-798, April.
    6. Ellabban, Omar & Abu-Rub, Haitham & Blaabjerg, Frede, 2014. "Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 748-764.
    7. Abbasi, Tasneem & Tauseef, S.M. & Abbasi, S.A., 2012. "Anaerobic digestion for global warming control and energy generation—An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3228-3242.
    8. Said, N. & El-Shatoury, S.A. & Díaz, L.F. & Zamorano, M., 2013. "Quantitative appraisal of biomass resources and their energy potential in Egypt," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 84-91.
    9. U. Rashid Sumaila & William W.L. Cheung & Philippe M. Cury & Travis Tai, 2017. "Climate change, marine ecosystems and global fisheries," Chapters, in: K. N. Ninan & Makoto Inoue (ed.), Building a Climate Resilient Economy and Society, chapter 9, pages 151-163, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Bilgen, Selçuk & Keleş, Sedat & Sarıkaya, İkbal & Kaygusuz, Kamil, 2015. "A perspective for potential and technology of bioenergy in Turkey: Present case and future view," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 228-239.
    11. Yoon, Sang Jun & Son, Yung-Il & Kim, Yong-Ku & Lee, Jae-Goo, 2012. "Gasification and power generation characteristics of rice husk and rice husk pellet using a downdraft fixed-bed gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 163-167.
    12. Panwar, N.L. & Kaushik, S.C. & Kothari, Surendra, 2011. "Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 1513-1524, April.
    13. Quirin Schiermeier & Jeff Tollefson & Tony Scully & Alexandra Witze & Oliver Morton, 2008. "Energy alternatives: Electricity without carbon," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7206), pages 816-823, August.
    14. Baruah, Dipal & Baruah, D.C., 2014. "Modeling of biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 806-815.
    15. Yıldırım, Ertugrul & Sukruoglu, Deniz & Aslan, Alper, 2014. "Energy consumption and economic growth in the next 11 countries: The bootstrapped autoregressive metric causality approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 14-21.
    16. Vera, D. & Jurado, F. & de Mena, B. & Schories, G., 2011. "Comparison between externally fired gas turbine and gasifier-gas turbine system for the olive oil industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 6720-6730.
    17. Food and Agriculture Organization, 2013. "The State of Food and Agriculture, 2013," Working Papers id:5511, eSocialSciences.
    18. Lu, Li & Tang, Ya & Xie, Jia-sui & Yuan, Yuan-liang, 2009. "The role of marginal agricultural land-based mulberry planting in biomass energy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1789-1794.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gaigalis, Vygandas & Katinas, Vladislovas, 2020. "Analysis of the renewable energy implementation and prediction prospects in compliance with the EU policy: A case of Lithuania," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1016-1027.
    2. Olatunji, Obafemi O. & Akinlabi, Stephen & Madushele, Nkosinathi & Adedeji, Paul A., 2020. "Property-based biomass feedstock grading using k-Nearest Neighbour technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hend Dakhel Alhassany & Safaa Malik Abbas & Marcos Tostado-Véliz & David Vera & Salah Kamel & Francisco Jurado, 2022. "Review of Bioenergy Potential from the Agriculture Sector in Iraq," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Emily Prehoda & Joshua M. Pearce & Chelsea Schelly, 2019. "Policies to Overcome Barriers for Renewable Energy Distributed Generation: A Case Study of Utility Structure and Regulatory Regimes in Michigan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Auld, Graeme & Renckens, Stefan, 2021. "Private sustainability governance, the Global South and COVID-19: Are changes to audit policies in light of the pandemic exacerbating existing inequalities?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Bilgen, Selçuk & Keleş, Sedat & Sarıkaya, İkbal & Kaygusuz, Kamil, 2015. "A perspective for potential and technology of bioenergy in Turkey: Present case and future view," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 228-239.
    5. Winfield, Mark & Shokrzadeh, Shahab & Jones, Adam, 2018. "Energy policy regime change and advanced energy storage: A comparative analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 572-583.
    6. Avri Eitan, 2021. "Promoting Renewable Energy to Cope with Climate Change—Policy Discourse in Israel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Tan, Wen-Shan & Hassan, Mohammad Yusri & Majid, Md Shah & Abdul Rahman, Hasimah, 2013. "Optimal distributed renewable generation planning: A review of different approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 626-645.
    8. Sánchez, M. & Clifford, B. & Nixon, J.D., 2018. "Modelling and evaluating a solar pyrolysis system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 630-638.
    9. Chen, Hao & Chen, Jiachuan & Han, Guoyi & Cui, Qi, 2022. "Winding down the wind power curtailment in China: What made the difference?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul & Aghili, Nasim, 2013. "The scenario of greenhouse gases reduction in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 400-409.
    11. Pablo Benalcazar & Adam Suski & Jacek Kamiński, 2020. "Optimal Sizing and Scheduling of Hybrid Energy Systems: The Cases of Morona Santiago and the Galapagos Islands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Reino-Rio, Cipriano & Borge-Diez, David & Collado-Fernández, Eduardo, 2016. "Distributed generation: A review of factors that can contribute most to achieve a scenario of DG units embedded in the new distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1130-1148.
    13. Joselin Herbert, G.M. & Unni Krishnan, A., 2016. "Quantifying environmental performance of biomass energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 292-308.
    14. Bian, Junsong & Zhao, Xuan, 2020. "Tax or subsidy? An analysis of environmental policies in supply chains with retail competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 901-914.
    15. Raijmakers, L.H.J. & Danilov, D.L. & Eichel, R.-A. & Notten, P.H.L., 2019. "A review on various temperature-indication methods for Li-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 918-945.
    16. Ozturk, Munir & Saba, Naheed & Altay, Volkan & Iqbal, Rizwan & Hakeem, Khalid Rehman & Jawaid, Mohammad & Ibrahim, Faridah Hanum, 2017. "Biomass and bioenergy: An overview of the development potential in Turkey and Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1285-1302.
    17. Karatayev, Marat & Hall, Stephen & Kalyuzhnova, Yelena & Clarke, Michèle L., 2016. "Renewable energy technology uptake in Kazakhstan: Policy drivers and barriers in a transitional economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 120-136.
    18. Avri Eitan & Gillad Rosen & Lior Herman & Itay Fishhendler, 2020. "Renewable Energy Entrepreneurs: A Conceptual Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Khaoula Ghefiri & Aitor J. Garrido & Eugen Rusu & Soufiene Bouallègue & Joseph Haggège & Izaskun Garrido, 2018. "Fuzzy Supervision Based-Pitch Angle Control of a Tidal Stream Generator for a Disturbed Tidal Input," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Geng, D. & Evans, S. & Kishita, Y., 2023. "The identification and classification of energy waste for efficient energy supervision in manufacturing factories," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:94:y:2018:i:c:p:28-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.