IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i19p3660-d270497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of Strength Properties of Energy Plants on the Example of Miscanthus × Giganteus , Rosa Multiflora and Salix Viminalis

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Słupska

    (Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Arkadiusz Dyjakon

    (Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Roman Stopa

    (Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Energy from biomass accounts for 70% of all renewables used for heat and electricity production. Such a significant share of biomass determines the need for the investigation of their mechanical properties, as most of the lignocellulosic material requires cutting, chipping or milling before its utilization for energy purposes. Therefore, the knowledge about cutting resistance, bending stiffness, and impact strength of the energy plants is very important. The values of these parameters are used in the proper selection of shredding machines and their elements, wrapping nets or determination of power demand during raw material conversion. This paper presents the results of research on the mechanical properties of selected energy plants. The scope of the research included three different plant species: Miscanthus × giganteus , Rosa multiflora , and Salix viminalis , investigated in terms of cutting resistance, bending stiffness and impact strength of stalks. The results showed that the average stalk cutting resistance for the rotation speed of 4200 RPM was 0.17 N·mm −2 for the Miscanthus × giganteus , 0.15 N·mm −2 for the Rosa multiflora and 0.2 N·mm −2 for the Salix viminalis . Meanwhile, for a rotation speed of 3200 RPM, the cutting resistance amounted to 0.15 N·mm −2 for Miscanthus × giganteus , 0.16 N·mm −2 for Rosa multiflora and 0.18 N·mm −2 for Salix viminalis . For the impact measurements, the Salix viminalis exceeded 40 J·mm −2 of absorbed energy. Meanwhile, the average impact strength value for the Rosa multiflora was 0.53 J·mm −2 and for the Miscanthus × giganteus was 0.22 J·mm −2 . The bending stiffness of Miscanthus × giganteus at an average modulus of 3.44 GPa was 1.1 N·m 2 for the basal zone, 0.78 N·m 2 for the central zone, and 0.72 N·m 2 of the apical zone. For the average Young’s modulus of 0.19 GPa, the bending stiffness of the Rosa multiflora reached a value of 0.64 N·m 2 for the basal zone, 0.23 N·m 2 for the central zone, and 0.28 N·m 2 for the apical zone. The Salix viminalis , with an average modulus of elasticity of 0.23 GPa, achieved bending stiffness in the basal zone of 0.99 N·m 2 , the central zone 0.33 N·m 2 , and the tip zone 0.38 N·m 2 . This research makes it possible to expand our knowledge in the field of biomass processing and construction of agricultural machinery with higher processing efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Słupska & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Roman Stopa, 2019. "Determination of Strength Properties of Energy Plants on the Example of Miscanthus × Giganteus , Rosa Multiflora and Salix Viminalis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3660-:d:270497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3660/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3660/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Manzone & Fabrizio Gioelli & Paolo Balsari, 2017. "Kiwi Clear‐Cut: First Evaluation of Recovered Biomass for Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Venturi, P. & Gigler, J.K. & Huisman, W., 1999. "Economical and technical comparison between herbaceous (Miscanthus x giganteus) and woody energy crops (Salix viminalis)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1023-1026.
    3. Luigi Pari & Vincenzo Alfano & Daniel Garcia-Galindo & Alessandro Suardi & Enrico Santangelo, 2018. "Pruning Biomass Potential in Italy Related to Crop Characteristics, Agricultural Practices and Agro-Climatic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2018. "Harvesting and Baling of Pruned Biomass in Apple Orchards for Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Róger Moya & Carolina Tenorio & Gloria Oporto, 2019. "Short Rotation Wood Crops in Latin American: A Review on Status and Potential Uses as Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Sher, Farooq & Pans, Miguel A. & Afilaka, Daniel T. & Sun, Chenggong & Liu, Hao, 2017. "Experimental investigation of woody and non-woody biomass combustion in a bubbling fluidised bed combustor focusing on gaseous emissions and temperature profiles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2069-2080.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kacper Świechowski & Małgorzata Leśniak & Andrzej Białowiec, 2021. "Medical Peat Waste Upcycling to Carbonized Solid Fuel in the Torrefaction Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Kacper Świechowski & Martyna Hnat & Paweł Stępień & Sylwia Stegenta-Dąbrowska & Szymon Kugler & Jacek A. Koziel & Andrzej Białowiec, 2020. "Waste to Energy: Solid Fuel Production from Biogas Plant Digestate and Sewage Sludge by Torrefaction-Process Kinetics, Fuel Properties, and Energy Balance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-37, June.
    3. Sławomir Francik & Bogusława Łapczyńska-Kordon & Norbert Pedryc & Wojciech Szewczyk & Renata Francik & Zbigniew Ślipek, 2022. "The Use of Artificial Neural Networks for Determining Values of Selected Strength Parameters of Miscanthus × Giganteus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2019. "The Influence of Apple Orchard Management on Energy Performance and Pruned Biomass Harvesting for Energetic Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Jan Den Boer & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Emilia Den Boer & Daniel García-Galindo & Techane Bosona & Girma Gebresenbet, 2020. "Life-Cycle Assessment of the Use of Peach Pruning Residues for Electricity Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2018. "The Influence of the Use of Windrowers in Baler Machinery on the Energy Balance during Pruned Biomass Harvesting in the Apple Orchard," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2018. "Harvesting and Baling of Pruned Biomass in Apple Orchards for Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Carlo Bisaglia & Massimo Brambilla & Maurizio Cutini & Antonio Bortolotti & Guido Rota & Giorgio Minuti & Roberto Sargiani, 2018. "Reusing Pruning Residues for Thermal Energy Production: A Mobile App to Match Biomass Availability with the Heating Energy Balance of Agro-Industrial Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Kargbo, Hannah & Harris, Jonathan Stuart & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "“Drop-in” fuel production from biomass: Critical review on techno-economic feasibility and sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Heng Wang & Zhaoping Zhong, 2019. "A Mixing Behavior Study of Biomass Particles and Sands in Fluidized Bed Based on CFD-DEM Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Sher, Farooq & Yaqoob, Aqsa & Saeed, Farrukh & Zhang, Shengfu & Jahan, Zaib & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2020. "Torrefied biomass fuels as a renewable alternative to coal in co-firing for power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. van der Hilst, F. & Dornburg, V. & Sanders, J.P.M. & Elbersen, B. & Graves, A. & Turkenburg, W.C. & Elbersen, H.W. & van Dam, J.M.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2010. "Potential, spatial distribution and economic performance of regional biomass chains: The North of the Netherlands as example," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(7), pages 403-417, September.
    10. Witzel, Carl-Philipp & Finger, Robert, 2016. "Economic evaluation of Miscanthus production – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 681-696.
    11. Huan Li & Huawei Mou & Nan Zhao & Yaohong Yu & Quan Hong & Mperejekumana Philbert & Yuguang Zhou & Hossein Beidaghy Dizaji & Renjie Dong, 2021. "Nitrogen Migration during Pyrolysis of Raw and Acid Leached Maize Straw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Hu, Yulin & Gong, Mengyue & Xing, Xuelian & Wang, Haoyu & Zeng, Yimin & Xu, Chunbao Charles, 2020. "Supercritical water gasification of biomass model compounds: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    13. Julio Barzola-Monteses & Mónica Mite-León & Mayken Espinoza-Andaluz & Juan Gómez-Romero & Waldo Fajardo, 2019. "Time Series Analysis for Predicting Hydroelectric Power Production: The Ecuador Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Hiloidhari, Moonmoon & Vijay, Vandit & Banerjee, Rangan & Baruah, D.C. & Rao, Anand B., 2021. "Energy-carbon-water footprint of sugarcane bioenergy: A district-level life cycle assessment in the state of Maharashtra, India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    15. Daniel García-Galindo & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Fernando Cay Villa-Ceballos, 2019. "Building Variable Productivity Ratios for Improving Large Scale Spatially Explicit Pruning Biomass Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Saaida Khlifi & Marzouk Lajili & Patrick Perré & Victor Pozzobon, 2022. "A Numerical Study of Turbulent Combustion of a Lignocellulosic Gas Mixture in an Updraft Fixed Bed Reactor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Islam Hassanin & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "Managing Supply Chain Activities in the Field of Energy Production Focusing on Renewables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-33, June.
    18. Teresa Enes & José Aranha & Teresa Fonseca & Domingos Lopes & Ana Alves & José Lousada, 2019. "Thermal Properties of Residual Agroforestry Biomass of Northern Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    19. Sher, Farooq & Smječanin, Narcisa & Khan, Muhammad Kashif & Shabbir, Imran & Ali, Salman & Hatshan, Mohammad Rafe & Ul Hai, Irfan, 2024. "Agglomeration behaviour of various biomass fuels under different air staging conditions in fluidised bed technology for renewable energy applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    20. Magdalena Dołżyńska & Sławomir Obidziński & Jolanta Piekut & Güray Yildiz, 2020. "The Utilization of Plum Stones for Pellet Production and Investigation of Post-Combustion Flue Gas Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3660-:d:270497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.