IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i22p4226-d283972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrative Effects of Sonication and Particle Size on Biomethanation of Tropical Grass Pennisetum purpureum Using Superior Diverse Inocula Cultures

Author

Listed:
  • Chettaphong Phuttaro

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand)

  • Alissara Reungsang

    (Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology, Khon Kean University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
    Research Group for Development of Microbial Hydrogen Production Process from Biomass, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

  • Piyarat Boonsawang

    (Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand)

  • Sumate Chaiprapat

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand
    PSU Energy Systems Research Institute (PERIN), Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand)

Abstract

Biogas from the fast growing crop, Pennisetum purpureum , has received considerable attention in Southeast Asia since wastewater and bio-waste materials are almost completely utilized. To overcome slow hydrolysis, a rate-limiting step in anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass, superior microorganism culture, size reduction, and sonication pretreatment were co-applied. In the first experiment, the selection of anaerobic microbial culture to be used in digestion, so-called inoculum, was carried out. Specific anaerobic activities for hydrolysis and methanogenesis of sludge from different sources, a slurry digester of cattle farm (CF) and a wastewater digester of rubber latex factory (RL) were assessed. Results revealed a remarkable synergistic capability in the combined sludge, adding 10% and 49% to the overall biomethanation efficiency over the individual CF and RL sludges. In the second part, interactive effects of size reduction and sonication intensity were studied. Biomethanation efficiency as methane yield increased by 62% by size and 115% by sonication variation, but when optimally combined an additional gain of 40% was recorded. The regression model generated could estimate the energy yield increase as a function of size and sonication intensity with a satisfactory statistical precision R 2 of 0.945.

Suggested Citation

  • Chettaphong Phuttaro & Alissara Reungsang & Piyarat Boonsawang & Sumate Chaiprapat, 2019. "Integrative Effects of Sonication and Particle Size on Biomethanation of Tropical Grass Pennisetum purpureum Using Superior Diverse Inocula Cultures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:22:p:4226-:d:283972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/22/4226/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/22/4226/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isah Y. Mohammed & Yousif A. Abakr & Feroz K. Kazi & Suzana Yusup & Ibraheem Alshareef & Soh A. Chin, 2015. "Comprehensive Characterization of Napier Grass as a Feedstock for Thermochemical Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Li, Wanwu & Khalid, Habiba & Zhu, Zhe & Zhang, Ruihong & Liu, Guangqing & Chen, Chang & Thorin, Eva, 2018. "Methane production through anaerobic digestion: Participation and digestion characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1219-1228.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kotchakarn Nantasaksiri & Patcharawat Charoen-Amornkitt & Takashi Machimura, 2021. "Land Potential Assessment of Napier Grass Plantation for Power Generation in Thailand Using SWAT Model. Model Validation and Parameter Calibration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk & Grzegorz Zając & Martin J. Wassen, 2023. "Grass from Road Verges as a Substrate for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Chen, Dengyu & Cen, Kehui & Cao, Xiaobing & Chen, Fan & Zhang, Jie & Zhou, Jianbin, 2021. "Insight into a new phenolic-leaching pretreatment on bamboo pyrolysis: Release characteristics of pyrolytic volatiles, upgradation of three phase products, migration of elements, and energy yield," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Sun, Hui & Wang, Enzhen & Li, Xiang & Cui, Xian & Guo, Jianbin & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "Potential biomethane production from crop residues in China: Contributions to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Lisandra Rocha-Meneses & Oghenetejiri Frances Otor & Nemailla Bonturi & Kaja Orupõld & Timo Kikas, 2019. "Bioenergy Yields from Sequential Bioethanol and Biomethane Production: An Optimized Process Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Qatan, Hesham Sadeq Obaid & Wan Ab Karim Ghani, Wan Azlina & Md Said, Mohamad Syazarudin, 2023. "Prediction and optimization of syngas production from Napier grass air gasification via kinetic modelling and response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    7. Nabila, Rakhmawati & Hidayat, Wahyu & Haryanto, Agus & Hasanudin, Udin & Iryani, Dewi Agustina & Lee, Sihyun & Kim, Sangdo & Kim, Soohyun & Chun, Donghyuk & Choi, Hokyung & Im, Hyuk & Lim, Jeonghwan &, 2023. "Oil palm biomass in Indonesia: Thermochemical upgrading and its utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    8. Achinas, Spyridon & Willem Euverink, Gerrit Jan, 2020. "Rambling facets of manure-based biogas production in Europe: A briefing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Sun Yong Park & Kwang Cheol Oh & Seok Jun Kim & La Hoon Cho & Young Kwang Jeon & DaeHyun Kim, 2023. "Development of a Biomass Component Prediction Model Based on Elemental and Proximate Analyses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.
    10. de Rossi, Eduardo & Tavares, Maria Herminia Ferreira & Teleken, Joel Gustavo & Cremonez, Paulo André & Christ, Divair & Gomes, Simone Damasceno & Bariccatti, Reinaldo Aparecido, 2022. "Production of biogas by microorganisms with saccharine sorghum straw as substrate with or without alkaline and citric pretreatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 617-626.
    11. Susanne Theuerl & Johanna Klang & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "Process Disturbances in Agricultural Biogas Production—Causes, Mechanisms and Effects on the Biogas Microbiome: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Isah Yakub Mohammed & Feroz Kabir Kazi & Suzana Yusup & Peter Adeniyi Alaba & Yahaya Muhammad Sani & Yousif Abdalla Abakr, 2016. "Catalytic Intermediate Pyrolysis of Napier Grass in a Fixed Bed Reactor with ZSM-5, HZSM-5 and Zinc-Exchanged Zeolite-A as the Catalyst," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Gandhi, Bhushan P. & Otite, Saanu Victoria & Fofie, Esther A. & Lag-Brotons, Alfonso José & Ezemonye, Lawrence I. & Semple, Kirk T. & Martin, Alastair D., 2022. "Kinetic investigations into the effect of inoculum to substrate ratio on batch anaerobic digestion of simulated food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 311-321.
    15. Liu, Chao & Liu, Jingyong & Evrendilek, Fatih & Xie, Wuming & Kuo, Jiahong & Buyukada, Musa, 2020. "Bioenergy and emission characterizations of catalytic combustion and pyrolysis of litchi peels via TG-FTIR-MS and Py-GC/MS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1074-1093.
    16. Shamurad, Burhan & Sallis, Paul & Petropoulos, Evangelos & Tabraiz, Shamas & Ospina, Carolina & Leary, Peter & Dolfing, Jan & Gray, Neil, 2020. "Stable biogas production from single-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    17. Zhao, Bo & Zheng, Pengfei & Yang, Yuyi & Sha, Hao & Cao, Shengxian & Wang, Gong & Zhang, Yanhui, 2022. "Enhanced anaerobic digestion under medium temperature conditions: Augmentation effect of magnetic field and composites formed by titanium dioxide on the foamed nickel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    18. Lee, Eun Seo & Park, Seon Yeong & Kim, Chang Gyun, 2023. "Feasibility test anaerobically enhancing methane yield under the injection of hydrogen and carbon dioxide," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 761-768.
    19. Wang, Bo & Xu, Fanfan & Zong, Peijie & Zhang, Jinhong & Tian, Yuanyu & Qiao, Yingyun, 2019. "Effects of heating rate on fast pyrolysis behavior and product distribution of Jerusalem artichoke stalk by using TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 486-496.
    20. Aixa Kari Gállego Bravo & Daniel Alejandro Salcedo Serrano & Gloria López Jiménez & Khemlal Nirmalkar & Selvasankar Murugesan & Jaime García-Mena & María Eugenia Gutiérrez Castillo & Luis Raúl Tovar G, 2019. "Microbial Profile of the Leachate from Mexico City’s Bordo Poniente Composting Plant: An Inoculum to Digest Organic Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:22:p:4226-:d:283972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.