IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i21p4206-d283435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technoeconomic Assessment of Hybrid Organosolv–Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Woody Biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Sennai Mesfun

    (RISE Research Institute of Sweden, P.O. Box 5604, 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Leonidas Matsakas

    (Biochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden)

  • Ulrika Rova

    (Biochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden)

  • Paul Christakopoulos

    (Biochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden)

Abstract

This study investigates technoeconomic performance of standalone biorefinery concepts that utilize hybrid organic solvent and steam explosion pretreatment technique. The assessments were made based on a mathematical process model developed in UniSim Design software using inhouse experimental data. The work was motivated by successful experimental applications of the hybrid pretreatment technique on lignocellulosic feedstocks that demonstrated high fractionation efficiency into a cellulose-rich, a hemicellulose-rich and lignin streams. For the biorefinery concepts studied here, the targeted final products were ethanol, organosolv lignin and hemicellulose syrup. Minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) and Internal rate of return (IRR) were evaluated as economic indicators of the investigated biorefinery concepts. Depending on the configuration, and allocating all costs to ethanol, MESP in the range 0.53–0.95 €/L were required for the biorefinery concepts to break even. Under the assumed ethanol reference price of 0.55 €/L, the corresponding IRR were found to be in the range −1.75–10.7%. Hemicellulose degradation and high steam demand identified as major sources of inefficiencies for the process and economic performance, respectively. Sensitivity of MESP and IRR towards the most influential technical, economic and market parameters performed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sennai Mesfun & Leonidas Matsakas & Ulrika Rova & Paul Christakopoulos, 2019. "Technoeconomic Assessment of Hybrid Organosolv–Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Woody Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:21:p:4206-:d:283435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/21/4206/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/21/4206/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Yunhua & Biddy, Mary J. & Jones, Susanne B. & Elliott, Douglas C. & Schmidt, Andrew J., 2014. "Techno-economic analysis of liquid fuel production from woody biomass via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 384-394.
    2. Sennai Mesfun & Jan-Olof Anderson & Kentaro Umeki & Andrea Toffolo, 2016. "Integrated SNG Production in a Typical Nordic Sawmill," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Morandin, Matteo & Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Maréchal, François & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A., 2011. "Synthesis and parameter optimization of a combined sugar and ethanol production process integrated with a CHP system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3675-3690.
    4. Frankó, Balázs & Galbe, Mats & Wallberg, Ola, 2016. "Bioethanol production from forestry residues: A comparative techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 727-736.
    5. LiLu T. Funkenbusch & Michael E. Mullins & Lennart Vamling & Tallal Belkhieri & Nattapol Srettiwat & Olumide Winjobi & David R. Shonnard & Tony N. Rogers, 2019. "Technoeconomic assessment of hydrothermal liquefaction oil from lignin with catalytic upgrading for renewable fuel and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), January.
    6. Reinhard Rauch & Jitka Hrbek & Hermann Hofbauer, 2014. "Biomass gasification for synthesis gas production and applications of the syngas," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 343-362, July.
    7. Christos Nitsos & Ulrika Rova & Paul Christakopoulos, 2017. "Organosolv Fractionation of Softwood Biomass for Biofuel and Biorefinery Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Anqing Zheng & Liqun Jiang & Zengli Zhao & Zhen Huang & Kun Zhao & Guoqiang Wei & Haibin Li, 2017. "Catalytic fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass for aromatic production: chemistry, catalyst and process," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Partridge & Ekaterina Sermyagina & Esa Vakkilainen, 2020. "Impact of Pretreatment on Hydrothermally Carbonized Spruce," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michał Wojcieszyk & Lotta Knuutila & Yuri Kroyan & Mário de Pinto Balsemão & Rupali Tripathi & Juha Keskivali & Anna Karvo & Annukka Santasalo-Aarnio & Otto Blomstedt & Martti Larmi, 2021. "Performance of Anisole and Isobutanol as Gasoline Bio-Blendstocks for Spark Ignition Engines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Ahlström, Johan M. & Pettersson, Karin & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Harvey, Simon, 2017. "Value chains for integrated production of liquefied bio-SNG at sawmill sites – Techno-economic and carbon footprint evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1590-1608.
    3. Sennai Mesfun & Gabriel Gustafsson & Anton Larsson & Mahrokh Samavati & Erik Furusjö, 2023. "Electrification of Biorefinery Concepts for Improved Productivity—Yield, Economic and GHG Performances," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, November.
    4. AlNouss, Ahmed & McKay, Gordon & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2020. "Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: A techno-economic-environmental evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    5. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    6. Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Fodor, Zsófia & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2012. "Total Site targeting with process specific minimum temperature difference (ΔTmin)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 20-28.
    7. Kargbo, Hannah & Harris, Jonathan Stuart & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "“Drop-in” fuel production from biomass: Critical review on techno-economic feasibility and sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Magdeldin, Mohamed & Kohl, Thomas & Järvinen, Mika, 2017. "Techno-economic assessment of the by-products contribution from non-catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of lignocellulose residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 679-695.
    9. Kumar, R. & Strezov, V., 2021. "Thermochemical production of bio-oil: A review of downstream processing technologies for bio-oil upgrading, production of hydrogen and high value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Gabbrielli, Roberto & Barontini, Federica & Frigo, Stefano & Bressan, Luigi, 2022. "Numerical analysis of bio-methane production from biomass-sewage sludge oxy-steam gasification and methanation process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    11. Patuzzi, Francesco & Basso, Daniele & Vakalis, Stergios & Antolini, Daniele & Piazzi, Stefano & Benedetti, Vittoria & Cordioli, Eleonora & Baratieri, Marco, 2021. "State-of-the-art of small-scale biomass gasification systems: An extensive and unique monitoring review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Mariana S. T. Amândio & Joana M. Pereira & Jorge M. S. Rocha & Luísa S. Serafim & Ana M. R. B. Xavier, 2022. "Getting Value from Pulp and Paper Industry Wastes: On the Way to Sustainability and Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-31, June.
    13. Raquel de Souza Deuber & Jéssica Marcon Bressanin & Daniel Santos Fernandes & Henrique Real Guimarães & Mateus Ferreira Chagas & Antonio Bonomi & Leonardo Vasconcelos Fregolente & Marcos Djun Barbosa , 2023. "Production of Sustainable Aviation Fuels from Lignocellulosic Residues in Brazil through Hydrothermal Liquefaction: Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Lech Nowicki & Dorota Siuta & Maciej Markowski, 2020. "Pyrolysis of Rapeseed Oil Press Cake and Steam Gasification of Solid Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, August.
    15. Feng, Junfeng & Hse, Chung-yun & Wang, Kui & Yang, Zhongzhi & Jiang, Jianchun & Xu, Junming, 2017. "Directional liquefaction of biomass for phenolic compounds and in situ hydrodeoxygenation upgrading of phenolics using bifunctional catalysts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-13.
    16. Kuba, Matthias & Kraft, Stephan & Kirnbauer, Friedrich & Maierhans, Frank & Hofbauer, Hermann, 2018. "Influence of controlled handling of solid inorganic materials and design changes on the product gas quality in dual fluid bed gasification of woody biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 230-240.
    17. Hegely, Laszlo & Lang, Peter, 2020. "Reduction of the energy demand of a second-generation bioethanol plant by heat integration and vapour recompression between different columns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    18. Clauser, Nicolás M. & Felissia, Fernando E. & Area, María C. & Vallejos, María E., 2021. "A framework for the design and analysis of integrated multi-product biorefineries from agricultural and forestry wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    19. Tzanetis, Konstantinos F. & Posada, John A. & Ramirez, Andrea, 2017. "Analysis of biomass hydrothermal liquefaction and biocrude-oil upgrading for renewable jet fuel production: The impact of reaction conditions on production costs and GHG emissions performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1388-1398.
    20. Konstantinos Chandolias & Enise Pekgenc & Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, 2019. "Floating Membrane Bioreactors with High Gas Hold-Up for Syngas-to-Biomethane Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:21:p:4206-:d:283435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.