IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v6y2021i1p5-d479890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aircraft Engine Run-to-Failure Dataset under Real Flight Conditions for Prognostics and Diagnostics

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Arias Chao

    (Chair of Intelligent Maintenance Systems, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
    Current address: HIL H 27.3, Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.)

  • Chetan Kulkarni

    (KBR, Inc., NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA 94035, USA)

  • Kai Goebel

    (Operation and Maintenance, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden
    PARC, Intelligent Systems Lab, Palo Alto, CA 94043, USA)

  • Olga Fink

    (Chair of Intelligent Maintenance Systems, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland)

Abstract

A key enabler of intelligent maintenance systems is the ability to predict the remaining useful lifetime (RUL) of its components, i.e., prognostics. The development of data-driven prognostics models requires datasets with run-to-failure trajectories. However, large representative run-to-failure datasets are often unavailable in real applications because failures are rare in many safety-critical systems. To foster the development of prognostics methods, we develop a new realistic dataset of run-to-failure trajectories for a fleet of aircraft engines under real flight conditions. The dataset was generated with the Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation (CMAPSS) model developed at NASA. The damage propagation modelling used in this dataset builds on the modelling strategy from previous work and incorporates two new levels of fidelity. First, it considers real flight conditions as recorded on board of a commercial jet. Second, it extends the degradation modelling by relating the degradation process to its operation history. This dataset also provides the health, respectively, fault class. Therefore, besides its applicability to prognostics problems, the dataset can be used for fault diagnostics.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Arias Chao & Chetan Kulkarni & Kai Goebel & Olga Fink, 2021. "Aircraft Engine Run-to-Failure Dataset under Real Flight Conditions for Prognostics and Diagnostics," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:5-:d:479890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/6/1/5/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/6/1/5/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shi, Zunya & Chehade, Abdallah, 2021. "A dual-LSTM framework combining change point detection and remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Li, Xiang & Ding, Qian & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2018. "Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Hu, Chao & Youn, Byeng D. & Wang, Pingfeng & Taek Yoon, Joung, 2012. "Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 120-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Jiaxian & Li, Dongpeng & Huang, Ruyi & Chen, Zhuyun & Li, Weihua, 2023. "Aero-engine remaining useful life prediction method with self-adaptive multimodal data fusion and cluster-ensemble transfer regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Wang, Yilin & Shen, Lei & Zhang, Yuxuan & Li, Yuanxiang & Zhang, Ruixin & Yang, Yongshen, 2023. "Self-supervised Health Representation Decomposition based on contrast learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Nejjar, Ismail & Geissmann, Fabian & Zhao, Mengjie & Taal, Cees & Fink, Olga, 2024. "Domain adaptation via alignment of operation profile for Remaining Useful Lifetime prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    4. Liao, Zengbu & Zhan, Keyi & Zhao, Hang & Deng, Yuntao & Geng, Jia & Chen, Xuefeng & Song, Zhiping, 2024. "Addressing class-imbalanced learning in real-time aero-engine gas-path fault diagnosis via feature filtering and mapping," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Salman Khalid & Jinwoo Song & Muhammad Muzammil Azad & Muhammad Umar Elahi & Jaehun Lee & Soo-Ho Jo & Heung Soo Kim, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Trends in Aircraft Structural Prognostics and Health Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-42, September.
    6. Wang, Yilin & Li, Yuanxiang & Zhang, Yuxuan & Lei, Jia & Yu, Yifei & Zhang, Tongtong & Yang, Yongshen & Zhao, Honghua, 2024. "Incorporating prior knowledge into self-supervised representation learning for long PHM signal," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    7. Zhou, Liang & Wang, Huawei & Xu, Shanshan, 2023. "Aero-engine prognosis strategy based on multi-scale feature fusion and multi-task parallel learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Yongmeng & Wu, Jiechang & Wu, Jun & Liu, Shuyong, 2022. "Dimensionality reduce-based for remaining useful life prediction of machining tools with multisensor fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    2. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yao & Hu, Zhenchao & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine enabled by fusing knowledge and deep learning models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Costa, Nahuel & Sánchez, Luciano, 2022. "Variational encoding approach for interpretable assessment of remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Fu, Song & Lin, Lin & Wang, Yue & Guo, Feng & Zhao, Minghang & Zhong, Baihong & Zhong, Shisheng, 2024. "MCA-DTCN: A novel dual-task temporal convolutional network with multi-channel attention for first prediction time detection and remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. Fan, Linchuan & Chai, Yi & Chen, Xiaolong, 2022. "Trend attention fully convolutional network for remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    6. Zhang, Jiusi & Jiang, Yuchen & Wu, Shimeng & Li, Xiang & Luo, Hao & Yin, Shen, 2022. "Prediction of remaining useful life based on bidirectional gated recurrent unit with temporal self-attention mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    7. Chen, Chong & Liu, Ying & Sun, Xianfang & Cairano-Gilfedder, Carla Di & Titmus, Scott, 2021. "An integrated deep learning-based approach for automobile maintenance prediction with GIS data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. He, Yuxuan & Su, Huai & Zio, Enrico & Peng, Shiliang & Fan, Lin & Yang, Zhaoming & Yang, Zhe & Zhang, Jinjun, 2023. "A systematic method of remaining useful life estimation based on physics-informed graph neural networks with multisensor data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    9. Li, Tianfu & Zhao, Zhibin & Sun, Chuang & Yan, Ruqiang & Chen, Xuefeng, 2021. "Hierarchical attention graph convolutional network to fuse multi-sensor signals for remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Yan, Shen & Shao, Haidong & Min, Zhishan & Peng, Jiangji & Cai, Baoping & Liu, Bin, 2023. "FGDAE: A new machinery anomaly detection method towards complex operating conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    11. Zhu, Qixiang & Zhou, Zheng & Li, Yasong & Yan, Ruqiang, 2024. "Contrastive BiLSTM-enabled Health Representation Learning for Remaining Useful Life Prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    12. Ding, Yifei & Jia, Minping & Miao, Qiuhua & Huang, Peng, 2021. "Remaining useful life estimation using deep metric transfer learning for kernel regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    13. Yu, Wennian & Kim, II Yong & Mechefske, Chris, 2020. "An improved similarity-based prognostic algorithm for RUL estimation using an RNN autoencoder scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    15. Fu, Song & Zhang, Yongjian & Lin, Lin & Zhao, Minghang & Zhong, Shi-sheng, 2021. "Deep residual LSTM with domain-invariance for remaining useful life prediction across domains," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    16. Xiao, Lei & Tang, Junxuan & Zhang, Xinghui & Bechhoefer, Eric & Ding, Siyi, 2021. "Remaining useful life prediction based on intentional noise injection and feature reconstruction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    17. Liu, Lu & Song, Xiao & Zhou, Zhetao, 2022. "Aircraft engine remaining useful life estimation via a double attention-based data-driven architecture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    18. Bae, Jinwoo & Xi, Zhimin, 2022. "Learning of physical health timestep using the LSTM network for remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Youdao Wang & Yifan Zhao, 2022. "Multi-Scale Remaining Useful Life Prediction Using Long Short-Term Memory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Yan, Jianhai & He, Zhen & He, Shuguang, 2023. "Multitask learning of health state assessment and remaining useful life prediction for sensor-equipped machines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:5-:d:479890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.