IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i4p367-d1586961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Methods and Models for Potato Yield Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Piekutowska

    (Department of Botany and Nature Protection, Institute of Biology, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, 22b Arciszewskiego St., 76-200 Słupsk, Poland)

  • Gniewko Niedbała

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the development and application of statistical methods, process-based models, machine learning, and deep learning techniques in potato yield forecasting. It emphasizes the importance of integrating diverse data sources, including meteorological, phenotypic, and remote sensing data. Advances in computer technology have enabled the creation of more sophisticated models, such as mixed, geostatistical, and Bayesian models. Special attention is given to deep learning techniques, particularly convolutional neural networks, which significantly enhance forecast accuracy by analyzing complex data patterns. The article also discusses the effectiveness of other algorithms, such as Random Forest and Support Vector Machines, in capturing nonlinear relationships affecting yields. According to standards adopted in agricultural research, the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) in the implementation of prediction issues should generally not exceed 15%. Contemporary research indicates that, through the use of advanced and accurate algorithms, the value of this error can reach levels of even less than 10 per cent, significantly increasing the efficiency of yield forecasting. Key challenges in the field include climatic variability and difficulties in obtaining accurate data on soil properties and agronomic practices. Despite these challenges, technological advancements present new opportunities for more accurate forecasting. Future research should focus on leveraging Internet of Things (IoT) technology for real-time data collection and analyzing the impact of biological variables on yield. An interdisciplinary approach, integrating insights from ecology and meteorology, is recommended to develop innovative predictive models. The exploration of machine learning methods has the potential to advance knowledge in potato yield forecasting and support sustainable agricultural practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Piekutowska & Gniewko Niedbała, 2025. "Review of Methods and Models for Potato Yield Prediction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-31, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:367-:d:1586961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/4/367/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/4/367/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatiana Mihaela Cătuna Petrar & Ioan Brașovean & Csaba-Pal Racz & Camelia Manuela Mîrza & Petru Daniel Burduhos & Cristian Mălinaș & Bianca Maria Moldovan & Antonia Cristina Maria Odagiu, 2024. "The Impact of Agricultural Inputs and Environmental Factors on Potato Yields and Traits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Wu, L. & McGechan, M.B. & McRoberts, N. & Baddeley, J.A. & Watson, C.A., 2007. "SPACSYS: Integration of a 3D root architecture component to carbon, nitrogen and water cycling—Model description," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 343-359.
    3. Patryk Hara & Magdalena Piekutowska & Gniewko Niedbała, 2023. "Prediction of Pea ( Pisum sativum L.) Seeds Yield Using Artificial Neural Networks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Martin Kuradusenge & Eric Hitimana & Damien Hanyurwimfura & Placide Rukundo & Kambombo Mtonga & Angelique Mukasine & Claudette Uwitonze & Jackson Ngabonziza & Angelique Uwamahoro, 2023. "Crop Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Case of Irish Potato and Maize," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. de Wit, Allard & Boogaard, Hendrik & Fumagalli, Davide & Janssen, Sander & Knapen, Rob & van Kraalingen, Daniel & Supit, Iwan & van der Wijngaart, Raymond & van Diepen, Kees, 2019. "25 years of the WOFOST cropping systems model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 154-167.
    6. Mohamad M. Awad, 2019. "Toward Precision in Crop Yield Estimation Using Remote Sensing and Optimization Techniques," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Gniewko Niedbała & Danuta Kurasiak-Popowska & Kinga Stuper-Szablewska & Jerzy Nawracała, 2020. "Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Analyze the Concentration of Ferulic Acid, Deoxynivalenol, and Nivalenol in Winter Wheat Grain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    8. Jarosław Kurek & Gniewko Niedbała & Tomasz Wojciechowski & Bartosz Świderski & Izabella Antoniuk & Magdalena Piekutowska & Michał Kruk & Krzysztof Bobran, 2023. "Prediction of Potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) Yield Based on Machine Learning Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Gniewko Niedbała & Danuta Kurasiak-Popowska & Magdalena Piekutowska & Tomasz Wojciechowski & Michał Kwiatek & Jerzy Nawracała, 2022. "Application of Artificial Neural Network Sensitivity Analysis to Identify Key Determinants of Harvesting Date and Yield of Soybean ( Glycine max [L.] Merrill) Cultivar Augusta," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Patryk Hara & Magdalena Piekutowska & Gniewko Niedbała, 2021. "Selection of Independent Variables for Crop Yield Prediction Using Artificial Neural Network Models with Remote Sensing Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patryk Hara & Magdalena Piekutowska & Gniewko Niedbała, 2023. "Prediction of Pea ( Pisum sativum L.) Seeds Yield Using Artificial Neural Networks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Patryk Hara & Magdalena Piekutowska & Gniewko Niedbała, 2022. "Prediction of Protein Content in Pea ( Pisum sativum L.) Seeds Using Artificial Neural Networks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Jarosław Kurek & Gniewko Niedbała & Tomasz Wojciechowski & Bartosz Świderski & Izabella Antoniuk & Magdalena Piekutowska & Michał Kruk & Krzysztof Bobran, 2023. "Prediction of Potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) Yield Based on Machine Learning Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Gniewko Niedbała & Sebastian Kujawa, 2023. "Digital Innovations in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-10, August.
    5. Wang, Yuehua & Wang, Zhongwu & Wu, Lianhai & Li, Haigang & Li, Jiangwen & Zhu, Aimin & Jin, Yuxi & Han, Guodong, 2024. "Effects of grazing and climate change on aboveground standing biomass and sheep live weight changes in the desert steppe in Inner Mongolia, China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Niwat Bhumiphan & Jurawan Nontapon & Siwa Kaewplang & Neti Srihanu & Werapong Koedsin & Alfredo Huete, 2023. "Estimation of Rubber Yield Using Sentinel-2 Satellite Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Shen Tan & Shengchao Qiao & Han Wang & Sheng Chang, 2024. "Predicting Wheat Potential Yield in China Based on Eco-Evolutionary Optimality Principles," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Wu, L. & Harris, P. & Misselbrook, T.H. & Lee, M.R.F., 2022. "Simulating grazing beef and sheep systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Gniewko Niedbała & Danuta Kurasiak-Popowska & Magdalena Piekutowska & Tomasz Wojciechowski & Michał Kwiatek & Jerzy Nawracała, 2022. "Application of Artificial Neural Network Sensitivity Analysis to Identify Key Determinants of Harvesting Date and Yield of Soybean ( Glycine max [L.] Merrill) Cultivar Augusta," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Bown, James L. & Pachepsky, Elizaveta & Eberst, Alistair & Bausenwein, Ursula & Millard, Peter & Squire, Geoff R. & Crawford, John W., 2007. "Consequences of intraspecific variation for the structure and function of ecological communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 264-276.
    11. Wang, Ying & Shi, Wenjuan & Wen, Tianyang, 2023. "Prediction of winter wheat yield and dry matter in North China Plain using machine learning algorithms for optimal water and nitrogen application," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    12. Shi, Yinfang & Wang, Zhaoyang & Hou, Cheng & Zhang, Puhan, 2022. "Yield estimation of Lycium barbarum L. based on the WOFOST model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    13. Feng, Dingrui & Li, Guangyong & Wang, Dan & Wulazibieke, Mierguli & Cai, Mingkun & Kang, Jing & Yuan, Zicheng & Xu, Houcheng, 2022. "Evaluation of AquaCrop model performance under mulched drip irrigation for maize in Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    14. Aqeel Iftikhar Jajja & Assad Abbas & Hasan Ali Khattak & Gniewko Niedbała & Abbas Khalid & Hafiz Tayyab Rauf & Sebastian Kujawa, 2022. "Compact Convolutional Transformer (CCT)-Based Approach for Whitefly Attack Detection in Cotton Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Sebastian Kujawa & Gniewko Niedbała, 2021. "Artificial Neural Networks in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-6, May.
    16. Kipling, Richard P. & Bannink, André & Bellocchi, Gianni & Dalgaard, Tommy & Fox, Naomi J. & Hutchings, Nicholas J. & Kjeldsen, Chris & Lacetera, Nicola & Sinabell, Franz & Topp, Cairistiona F.E. & va, 2016. "Modeling European ruminant production systems: Facing the challenges of climate change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 24-37.
    17. Mary Ollenburger & Page Kyle & Xin Zhang, 2022. "Uncertainties in estimating global potential yields and their impacts for long-term modeling," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(5), pages 1177-1190, October.
    18. Melpomeni Nikou & Theodoros Mavromatis, 2023. "Demonstrating the Use of the Yield-Gap Concept on Crop Model Calibration in Data-Poor Regions: An Application to CERES-Wheat Crop Model in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Aliakbar Mohammadi Mirik & Mahdieh Parsaeian & Abbas Rohani & Shaneka Lawson, 2023. "Optimizing Linseed ( Linum usitatissimum L.) Seed Yield through Agronomic Parameter Modeling via Artificial Neural Networks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Muhammad Alkaff & Abdullah Basuhail & Yuslena Sari, 2025. "Optimizing Water Use in Maize Irrigation with Reinforcement Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:367-:d:1586961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.